Second Way To Get RIAA To Drop Case: Die And Get Your Story Told Widely

from the start-making-a-list dept

Last month we pointed to a few examples of the RIAA dropping file sharing lawsuits once it became clear that they couldn't prove who was actually using the internet connection (since they only have IP address info to base their lawsuits on). Trying that is probably a more reasonable method than dying, especially after yesterday's story wondering why the RIAA would keep going after a family after the person named in the suit had died. As we explained, even if it was within the RIAA's legal right to go after the estate (as it is), it seemed like a ridiculously bad move from a PR standpoint, for almost no real gain for the RIAA. It appears that, in fact, no one at the RIAA actually thought through the consequences of pushing on with the case (following a 60 day break to allow the family to "grieve"). However, once the issue started getting a bunch of attention over the weekend on various blogs, the RIAA has now decided to drop the case. They explain that the man who passed away had admitted that his stepson had actually done the file sharing, so they were simply trying to finalize the details of a settlement. However, out of their "abundance of sensitivity" (yes, they used that phrase), they have decided to drop the case. Seems a bit funny that said abundance of sensitivity didn't show up until the equally abundant "bad PR" hit the internet.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Bull Shifter, 16 Aug 2006 @ 4:16am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: RIAA

    Sorry, Buddy, you missed the target. There is a difference between the bottom line and a side issue.

    "the RIAA's actions have continued to hurt their business by pissing off their biggest fans" This is a result of the RIAA's actions. Besides, if I recall, the RIAA has no fans. It's a trade organization comprised of record companies. When's the last time you, as a fan, went to an RIAA concert?

    "...coming up with a new business model that embraces what the fans want, rather than pissing them off at every turn." What these "fans" want is free music. If you had a box of cookies and your friends kept taking them from you without asking, would you come up with a new business model that embraces your friends so that you wouldn't piss them off..... for stealing your cookies?

    "the "bottom line" is that it's a bad business policy for the RIAA to go down this route." It's actually good business policy for the RIAA to not only go down this route but to also take up all 4 lanes on this road. They're recovering money lost from file sharing. And, don't YOU go down the "route" of saying the artists/record labels/etc make too much as it is. That's called free enterprise, and, again, it's a side issue. If you were The Beastie Boys, you'd want to be able to make money off of your record "sales" as well as anyone else.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.