Kazaa And Skype Not Enough: Founders Now Looking At Online TV Distribution

from the so-they-say dept

Apparently the billions of dollars Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis picked up when eBay overpaid for Skype isn't enough. Business Week reports that the two are working on a new project that has to do with video sharing for television programming. The two are supposedly still working at Skype. Zennstrom is just contributing money and advice, with Friis spending 20% of his time on the new effort -- which is supposedly trying to partner with just about every TV network they can talk to. Of course, it's worth remembering that the music industry would still like to put the two of these guys in jail for Kazaa -- which has kept them out of the US, despite the eBay buyout. They also face charges from rival Streamcast that Skype actually uses Kazaa code, which Zennstrom (so the lawsuit charges) promised Streamcast it could buy. In other words, despite the success of Skype, there may be some legal baggage associated with any new company they're involved in -- especially for those in the entertainment industry. Also, of course, the video streaming and distribution market is already incredibly crowded -- with players from YouTube to BitTorrent already having plenty of users and name recognition. While it's true that neither Kazaa nor Skype were first to market in their spaces, neither market was nearly as crowded as the online video market is already today.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    PaulM, 24 Jul 2006 @ 9:10am

    bit torrent NOT more efficient protocol than strai

    Re: Re: Re: WTF? by Ben on Jul 24th, 2006 @ 7:13am
    Its only illegal if you use it to share copywriten files. There are plenty of files that are legal to share and much more efficent than a straight download from a website.

    no, bit torrent is NOT more efficient - there is quite a big overhead of slicing & dicing files into little chunks.

    ISPs particularly hate it as it uses the back-channel, and cable companies have largely built their networks mainly for customers to download

    however, it DOES save bandwidth but only for the original seeder, allowing someone on a DSL or cable connection to serve 100's of downloaders but only have to actually perform a small number of parallel uploads.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.