How Long Does The RIAA Get To Abuse The Legal System?

from the keep-on-suing dept

The RIAA has dropped its file-sharing suit against an Oklahoma mother who had no connection to any such activities, beyond paying an ISP bill. Good news -- sort of. The case was dropped after the woman filed a claim to have it dismissed, then faced with the prospect their case would be thrown out, the RIAA asked -- and was allowed -- to withdraw it on their own instead. This is basically the same scenario as that of a Michigan woman who the group sued because her kids were alleged to be file-sharing, though in this most recent case, the RIAA will have to pay the defandant's legal bills. Several questions are raised here, but first and foremost is why does the RIAA simply get to drop these lawsuits with little or no repercussions when it becomes clear they're bogus? Again and again, the RIAA has filed these spurious lawsuits, simply bullying people and employing dubious tactics. And despite not ever actually winning a fully litigated case, instead just trying to steamroll people into paying ridiculous damages, the RIAA rolls on. At some point, shouldn't somebody put a stop to these bogus suits, and force the RIAA to own up to the consequences of using the legal system as its personal sandbox? The costs of these individual cases mean nothing to the RIAA, even if they have to pay a defendant's legal bills, but the costs to the people they're suing -- who are often innocent, but are bullied into settling -- are significant. Why are they allowed to continue? Keep in mind, too, that the lawsuits have done nothing to stop file-sharing.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    You Want to be the Doctor?, 14 Jul 2006 @ 11:02am

    They Know Not What They Do

    My brother is a surgeon. Not a doctor, a surgeon. Four years college, five years Med school (not some lame three year law program that any flunky PoliSci major can tackle), three years residency, .... And he's paying for all of this, not being paid mind you. So then he's 30something and a gainful member of the workforce, up to his eyeballs in BIG debt. Now bring on the lawyers and the "health care system." Throw that docotr-patient relationship crap out the window, because our two antagonists won't hear of it. Blah, blah, blah. So after a DECADE of study and work, he finally performs his first gall bladder surgery. The patient is billed over $3,000. My brother? His check is for less than $800 for several hours work (my last lawyer--a crook to be sure--billed at $400/hr. to no effect) before taxes and insurance premiums. But you know what? If you work enough 16 hour days for enough years, yeah, you DO have a nice house, and car, and boat, and other toys. I don't begrudge him a single one of them. I sure as hell would never have gone through what he has been through to get to where he is today. Trust me, the most of you, you wouldn't either. The next time you need a doctor, remember to say thank you. And when you get the bill--shoot the lawyer, not the doctor.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.