Thinking Digitally Is Not A Separate Job Function

from the it's-part-of-everything dept

During the original internet boom years, there were lots of old school companies who realized they needed to get this internet thing, so they would appoint someone to have a title like "Chief Internet Officer" to show they were doing something. Of course, in most cases, they would come up with big dumb "internet ideas" like creating yet another portal in a very crowded market. It appears that the trend of Chief Internet Officers is back -- and it's the same big old media companies. It really was just a few months ago when we mocked MTV for a Business Week article talking about how much the company now "got" the internet. The quotes and strategies in the article suggested that wasn't the case at all. Still, it's a bit surprising that it didn't take long for it to play out. Business Week (again) is now reporting that the 30-something they hired as "Chief Digital Officer" to lead the internetification of MTV has quietly left the company, less than a year after being appointed (we'll note that the Business Week article doesn't seem to acknowledge its gushing profile of the supposedly new digitally focused MTV from just a few months earlier).

The article also notes that other media firms have been appointing similarly titled individuals to help craft a digital/internet strategy. This is a very traditional media way of thinking about things: the internet is just another channel, and so you need to program it like you would a TV network or a magazine. That's absolutely the wrong way to think about these things. The internet isn't a broadcast medium for content providers. The internet has always been about communications -- and content providers need to recognize that. The way for old media companies to embrace digital isn't to appoint a chief digital officer who has no power, but to recognize that an understanding of the internet needs to pervade all aspects of the business. The internet isn't just another platform, but something that will impact every other aspect of their business, by enhancing, changing, challenging and reshaping how they create, deliver and promote all of the content they offer now. These companies don't need Chief Digital Officers. It's not a separate job function. They need to get the entire company thinking digitally and understanding how it impacts their business.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Andrew B, 13 May 2007 @ 7:00am

    Need CDO to Transition

    I agree that in a future state down the road all divisions will incorporate digital/internet strategy and methods into what they do: content generation, marketing, ops, crm, etc. However most media companies will take some time getting there and a CDO will be necessary to drive it from the top.

    Of course the CDO will require money and staff, which willl need to come from other groups: marketing, tech, design, biz dev folks will need to come together in a new way.

    When the new models are established, the CDO job could transition away. For larger older media companies however, that will take some time.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.