Thinking Digitally Is Not A Separate Job Function

from the it's-part-of-everything dept

During the original internet boom years, there were lots of old school companies who realized they needed to get this internet thing, so they would appoint someone to have a title like "Chief Internet Officer" to show they were doing something. Of course, in most cases, they would come up with big dumb "internet ideas" like creating yet another portal in a very crowded market. It appears that the trend of Chief Internet Officers is back -- and it's the same big old media companies. It really was just a few months ago when we mocked MTV for a Business Week article talking about how much the company now "got" the internet. The quotes and strategies in the article suggested that wasn't the case at all. Still, it's a bit surprising that it didn't take long for it to play out. Business Week (again) is now reporting that the 30-something they hired as "Chief Digital Officer" to lead the internetification of MTV has quietly left the company, less than a year after being appointed (we'll note that the Business Week article doesn't seem to acknowledge its gushing profile of the supposedly new digitally focused MTV from just a few months earlier).

The article also notes that other media firms have been appointing similarly titled individuals to help craft a digital/internet strategy. This is a very traditional media way of thinking about things: the internet is just another channel, and so you need to program it like you would a TV network or a magazine. That's absolutely the wrong way to think about these things. The internet isn't a broadcast medium for content providers. The internet has always been about communications -- and content providers need to recognize that. The way for old media companies to embrace digital isn't to appoint a chief digital officer who has no power, but to recognize that an understanding of the internet needs to pervade all aspects of the business. The internet isn't just another platform, but something that will impact every other aspect of their business, by enhancing, changing, challenging and reshaping how they create, deliver and promote all of the content they offer now. These companies don't need Chief Digital Officers. It's not a separate job function. They need to get the entire company thinking digitally and understanding how it impacts their business.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Wizard Prang, 28 Jun 2006 @ 12:10pm

    Come on in, the water's lovely

    "The fact that the internet can be an ad billboard or communications forum, at the same time, is it's greatest strength."

    Too many companies are using it as an ad billboard ("Just set up a website") and avoiding the communications forum ("No can do - costs money and resources").


    "However, I can't bring myself to indicte or blame a company that approaches the internet with a tepid "move slowly and stick to the side of the pool" mentality"

    I don't _blame_ them either... but it is a rather myopic way of using the Internet. I once worked for a company that spent millions on trying to "build a web presence". Trouble was, their website did not work very well, and when it did, they did not have the resources in place to support the customers. Everyone on the front lines knew this, but Management refused to listen, preferring to believe what the consultants told them. End result: millions flushed down the toilet.


    "Truly sucessfull long term companies have learned one thing and that is that while change is necessary, change management is key. So yes, companies do need to embrace the internet and all of its possibilities, but it needs to be done in such a way as to make sure the embrace is a mutual loving one and not one that places the company in dissaray."

    How many "long term companies" have really embraced the Internet? Even Microsoft had difficulties doing so. Most of the innovative uses of the Internet come from nimble startups. In many cases the big companies embrace the Internet by acquiring those startups.


    "The marketing people know how to make commercials and ads not how to run a chat room and such."

    Those who DO know - the geeks - are ignored because CxOs listen to Sales and Marketing first, Personnel/Human Resources second... and the techs not at all.

    It's not a question of skills, it's a question of attitude and leadership.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.