NTP Co-founder Finds New Patents To Threaten Companies With

from the fun-fun-fun dept

Soon after RIM decided to settle their lawsuit with NTP for over $600 million, just as most of the NTP patents were being rejected by the patent office, we noted that other patent owners would be emboldened to go on similar fishing expeditions. Apparently, at least one of them decided to hire the NTP lawyer himself to do so. Mousky writes in to point out that a Canadian company, Belzberg Technologies, has hired Donald Stout, the lawyer who teamed up with Thomas Campana to form NTP as a patent holding firm. Belzberg looks like a similar situation. They hold a broad patent that they believe covers all electronic stock trading -- and they now want everyone to pay up. This again highlights a problem with the patent system. If, as Mr. Belzberg claims, "without that technology there wouldn't be any electronic trading," then that suggests that, without such a patent, no one else would have figured out how to trade online -- which seems highly questionable. Yet, with the way the patent system works, he now gets to tell other companies that they need to pay up -- most likely for something they came up with entirely without Belzberg's patents. As the internet took off trading online became an "obvious" next step of the technology -- but because one guy filed such patents, he now gets to waste lots of people's time and money on such patent threats. Again, we wonder how this promotes innovation.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Rocket Scientist, 22 May 2006 @ 2:50pm

    post hoc ergo proctor hoc

    All of which is to say that, now that online trading is mature is really easy for armchair patent pundits like Mike to talk about how obvious everything is (including his remedies for the so-called broken patent system).

    Without a look at the dates of the patent in question and other factors, it is impossible to tell whether the claims are meritorious. If they are however, I say more power to them.

    I guess Philo Farnsworth would be rolling in his grave if he heard idiots like Mike saying that 'its hard to believe that without the Farnsworth patent, there would be no TV...' Fact is, in many cases, there wouldn't be the underlying technology but for the inventive activity of the inventor.

    Mike would rather have Marxism or anarchy and their attendant economic inefficiencies... But he won't openly admit that because he probably doesn't even realize that that's what he's advocating...

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.