Surprise, Surprise: Web Filters Still Suck

from the not-so-helpful dept

For years, we've been hearing stories about how schools and libraries need to install web filters (usually "to protect the children"). When the government first tried to require such filters in places like libraries, the courts struck it down, noting that the filters sucked, and not only would ban way too much legitimate content, but would also fail to stop an awful lot of the content it was supposed to stop. This decision was later overturned by the Supreme Court, though the dissenting decision pointed out that (like so many of these "for the sake of the children" policies), since the filters are so bad, it would lead to a false sense of security. In other words, such laws don't protect the children, they make things worse, by not teaching them how to be responsible surfers and makes parents think they don't need to be as vigilant over what their children do online. Of course, supporters of the law said that at least the filters did "something" and they would get better over time. Still, if that "something" is only a false sense of security, that doesn't seem very useful. As for the filter improvements, a new study has found that the filters still are dreadful, blocking all sorts of information that should never be blocked (much of it, based on ideological viewpoints, rather than what's required by the law). The report notes that it's unlikely that the law will be repealed any time soon (and, as we've noted some politicians are looking to expand it to cover social networks and instant messaging as well). However, it does suggest no longer using filters that include blocks based on ideology as well as making sure blocked sites are clearly explained, along with instructions on how to remove the block, if it's determined to be in error. In the meantime, parents go on thinking their kids are somehow "safe" while those kids are probably getting around the filters anyway.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Allan, 18 May 2006 @ 2:15am

    Web Filters

    As the author notes the indiscriminate nature of web filters makes them both ineffective and problematic.
    I think that it is the parent the has the ultimate resposibility to ensure that their children do not recieve harmul content from the internet.
    The rest of us can take care of oursleves.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Jim, 18 May 2006 @ 11:14am

    Re: Web Filters

    I agree with the parents being responsible. But let me ask a question that I do not have the answer to. Which as an IT person for a large school district troubles me.

    What would you have the public schools do without filters?

    And let me make sure you understand the problems with some of the responses you are going to make.

    We should watch them when they are online. Fair enough, are the taxpayers ready to pay for the added staff? Of course not.

    We should discipline them when they are caught. Fair enough, are you ready for virtually all the students to be suspended...and then the district to go bankrupt when all the parents then sue?

    Should we just keep them off the internet? To be honest, that is about where my thinking is right now.

    I see all these articles bashing filters, yet no one takes the time to offer a real soluton.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    Mike (profile), 18 May 2006 @ 12:19pm

    Re: Re: Web Filters

    I see all these articles bashing filters, yet no one takes the time to offer a real soluton.

    Did you read the entire post? At the end, it does have a bunch of suggestions...

    However, the most important one, which you don't mention, is TEACHING KIDS that the internet isn't always a safe place, and teaching them how to watch out for themselves and recognize when they're in danger.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 May 2006 @ 6:10pm

    "At the end, it does have a bunch of suggestions... "

    Yes I did. And now I have re-read it three times. Please quote those suggestions. Because all I see is some vague suggestions on what kinds of filters not to use. And how to make sure they can get stuff unblocked as needed. We do that btw.

    Now, as for teaching kids......do expain how you want a High School teacher to teach a 16 year old boy not to surf for porn.

    Again, my question was, and is. What do you the public want the schools to do?

    Right now, today. How do you want internet access for your children handled at the school level.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Andrew, 29 Jun 2006 @ 4:59am

    Re: Re: Web Filters

    Honestly,

    I remember when I was 16 years old and looking for porn. um..I don't see a problem with it.

    And the best way to make a better society is to educate our children. Porn, okay fine I don't care about porn, boys will be boys and if they don't get it from the internet they'll just find their fathers porn collection, or use the Walmart lingerie ads. I think whats more important though is pages about Nazi's, the KKK and other extremist groups. I do believe in free speech and think that they should be allowed to express their beliefs, but there comes a critical time when raising children that they must learn to evaluate things for themselves. This goes back to the whole idea about santa, cartoons aren't real, movies aren't real, what do you believe and what don't you believe?

    the odds of a 10 year old stumbling upon a KKK page while looking for pokemon is quite small. But if the children are old enough to find the content, then they should be educated on how to handle it. After all, if they don't find it on the internet, they're going to find the racism in their community, on the TV, in movies, in newspapers and pretty much any other place. Eliminating their internet isn't a solution to the problem, just the plugging of a hole in the side of the boat during "The perfect storm".

    Education is the key, not censorship.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Stute, 14 Feb 2007 @ 1:01pm

    They do "something" alright

    Bypassing filters in school taught me how to... Well... Bypass filters and do other such naughty things with a PC...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    carl denham, 30 Mar 2007 @ 8:17am

    filters suck

    filters suck

    Goodbye

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    jack driscoll, 30 Mar 2007 @ 8:19am

    Re: Re: Web Filters

    we should just get rid of the internet completely destroy all the computers and the world will be a little bit better

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    coby, 30 Apr 2007 @ 7:57am

    bebo

    hello

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    omelet, 4 May 2007 @ 5:31am

    Re: Re: Re: Web Filters

    how about we only destroy yours and slash your tires?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    me, 17 Sep 2007 @ 4:28am

    me

    get me passed the school filter NOW!!!!!!!!!! bitch

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    get a life, 28 Sep 2007 @ 12:55pm

    Re: me

    I don't like you, i don't even know you but I would not want my daughter subjected to you, Clean up your mouth.

    I don't want my 7 YEAR OLD daughter to look at pornographic pics and become a sexual deviant like you

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Get a life, 28 Sep 2007 @ 12:56pm

    Re: filters suck

    You are just saying that probably because you are sexial deviant or just a young person who wants to view naked pics

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    anonymous, 1 Oct 2007 @ 12:31pm

    Re: Re: me

    I think this woman is a sexual deviant and has those pics on her computer, and her daughter saw them. Now she's paranoid

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    lil dee, 11 Oct 2007 @ 6:13am

    Re: Re: Re: me

    you are stupid ass fuck you dont know what you talkin about

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16. identicon
    Cricket, 15 Oct 2007 @ 9:45am

    all i wanna do is get on myspace during school!
    thats all i wanna do...my teacher always gives us work to do but, honestly its extremly stupid! but, no one else does there work in here either...help me out people
    love yall!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17. identicon
    Geek, 25 Mar 2008 @ 5:51am

    Re: Re: Re: Web Filters

    Computer's are a heavy part of life nowadays, in case you didn't notice. I'd go into detail of how, but it would take up the entire list. Just as the other people on the site who actually give a damn.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18. identicon
    Up yours, 25 Mar 2008 @ 5:55am

    Re: Re: filters suck

    Do you have any Idea how much the web filters block? Game sites, youtube, and forums to name a few. And despite popular belief, I don't beat off in public where the filters are used. Dumbass.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19. identicon
    You are an ass, 25 Mar 2008 @ 5:57am

    You suck

    Yeah? Then don't let her look at em'.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20. identicon
    Andrew is awesome, 25 Mar 2008 @ 6:00am

    THANK YOU

    My thoughts are exact.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21. identicon
    electo, 19 Oct 2009 @ 5:33am

    Re: Re: filters suck

    not everyone who wants to get past these pointless blocks are perverts. The filters realy do block lots of legitamate sights and even if they do block legitamatly bad ones than kids will always find a way around it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22. identicon
    Reynold Hoek, 13 Sep 2011 @ 6:50pm

    The only thing people ever seem to focus on in these stories are the content blocking feature of web filters. Many organizations install systems like the M86 web filter in order to block malware, viruses, high-bandwidth sites, etc.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23. identicon
    Brett Keane, 8 Nov 2013 @ 8:02am

    Fuck The Children!

    Fuck the children! ... Literaly

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24. identicon
    ambrose, 5 Oct 2019 @ 8:57am

    Re: Re: filters suck

    no, because filters don't actually block those like they are SUPPOSED TO!!! They block everything else that is actually useful instead.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Advertisment

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.