HideWe're off for the long weekend! For now, check out our Black Friday sale on all Techdirt gear »
HideWe're off for the long weekend! For now, check out our Black Friday sale on all Techdirt gear »

San Francisco, Philly, and Silicon Valley Muni WiFi

Two part story here. Firstly, a group led by Intel and civic groups like the San Mateo County Telecommunications Authority plan to RFP a "Smart Valley" Muni Wireless network to cover all of Silicon Valley including coverage up to Hayward and down to Santa Cruz. That's an ambitiously large area, but the linked article in CIO argues that, "Similar efforts to build wireless networks in Philadelphia and San Francisco have been successful." Well, that just wrong. Sounds like the CIO reporter swallowed the spin from a corporate backer of the so-called "Smart Valley" project. Truth is, it's way too early to declare success for either the Philly or SF Muni WiFi networks.

Part 2 - A quick update on Philly and SF. Philly seems to have taken the time, spoken to the community groups and stakeholders, had open review cycles, and educated themselves enough to put together a strong RFP that defined minimum service levels, guaranteed service to poor residents, and demanded something in return of the vendor who would be granted a virtual monopoly. Earthlink ended up with the winning bid. Total Telecom, yesterday, offered the news that Philly's "...Deployment to start in spring 2007." Start in 2007?? What Where did 2006 go? Meanwhile, San Francisco went the opposite route, with a poorly fleshed out RFP which was leaked to the public in December. The mayor's office held mostly closed RFP sessions, shutting out stakeholders. In the end, the RFP doesn't seem to address the needs of the poor, minimum throughputs, minimum coverage, nor define premium services or advertising guidelines. Tech-savvy community groups are concerned that the RFP is too weak, and that it is a vanity project of the mayor that is giving too much to a backroom front-runner (Google). So of the two, Philly is clearly on a better, albeit slow, path. The SF process sounds like a SNAFU. As for the CIO article, it's hardly responsible reporting to use the past tense to say "Similar efforts to build wireless networks in Philadelphia and San Francisco have been successful."
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: wifi, wi-fi


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.