The Difference Between Anonymity And Accountability
from the not-tied-to-each-other dept
Recently, it's seemed like online anonymity has been under attack. There's no doubt that people hide behind anonymity online to do bad things -- but it's not necessarily the anonymity that's the problem. Bruce Schneier has an essay up on Wired News pointing out that the real problem is accountability, which can still exist with anonymity, though historically the two have been intertwined. It's a good thing to remember the next time someone speaks out against online anonymity. Usually the problem is actually with accountability.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Anonymous versus Nickname
You may not know the "real names" of sellers on Ebay, but they are far from anonymous. The definition of anonymous is "Having no distinctive character or recognition factor." A consistent name defies that rule, and a truly anonymous netizen has no accountability. The two are truly inextricably entertwined.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anonymous versus Nickname
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anonymous versus Nickname
It simply is the need to be able to supply information without suffering recrimination by
those in power.
I think that people
one can usually eventually determine the truth
if you have enougt data -i.e. both the true statements and the false ones.
I can suggest if is like having a newby who buys a product and complians if does not work.
Other more knowledgable users will report on their success with the
product. So good products can still be detected even if there is some mininformation.
It is simple the process of making decisions with
information send with noise. Engineering systems
handle it well. So do people if they have the info.
But the inperfection is the misuse of power - or the fear of misuse of power.
Whether you are the CEO of a big corporation
or a policeman, or the gov. you can misuse your power.
e.g. the policeman who used the police
data base to find people for his personal gain.
It is the misuse of power which usually the reason for secrecy.
What the internet permits - and this is good
is to make it easier for individuals to
be informed.
Ebay shows a solution that works that tends to stop fraud without using identifification.
The goal is to communicate accurate information
over a noisy channel. Some messages may be wrong
but if we can detect the incorrect ones then one
can use the system for good.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
This doesn't make a case for online anonymity
When I think about people trying to be anonymous online, I don't first think of eBay -- a place where people can be anonymous, yet still accountable, because ultimately, they have an identity and a record.
I do not think the accountability model witnessed at eBay can be applied to the Internet, and therefore online anonymity is still a dangerous topic.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
99% of them have not yet reached puberty. 0.75% are morning radio shock jocks. Exactly 0.00% ever have anything worthwhile to contribute to any discussion of any import.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
99% of them have not yet reached puberty. 0.75% are morning radio shock jocks. Exactly 0.00% ever have anything worthwhile to contribute to any discussion of any import.
.325% belong to a band by that name.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
With anonymity there is freedom. Don’t be so afra
The reason anonymity is so popular, is that a lot of people like to do things that the “public” thinks is deviant, or wrong. Like having sex.
Not having the ability to anonymously exchange information about “embarrassing” but life threatening information is dangerous. I would much prefer that my daughter be able to anonymously learn where to get condoms, and how to properly use them, than that the Feds are not able to figure out who bought an extra ton of fertilizer this month.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment
Add A Reply