More Telecom Reform Designed To Make A Telco Happy

from the bought-and-paid-for dept

Ah, telecom reform. While it's become clear that FCC chair Kevin Martin is doing his best to keep the incumbent telcos happy, we shouldn't forget that the Senate seems to be doing the same. Earlier this year, we spoke about a Telecom Reform bill introduced by Senator John Ensign that seemed to be pretty much everything the big telcos wanted. Of course, there are different ways to make all the big telcos happy, so Senator Jim DeMint introduced his own Telecom Reform bill today, that, once again, will make the incumbents smile. It has some good, and some bad (just like the Ensign plan) -- and in some ways it all depends on how you look at it (or how you write about it). Network World has an article that highlights some of the reasons to like the proposal. It scales back the FCC so that they're only supposed to regulate in situations where there's clear market failure. That's a good thing -- except for the fact that this FCC has made it pretty clear that their definition of market failure is quite different than how a lot of other people feel. Besides, it's not even true (despite the lovely quotes from the fully paid for think tank pushing this bill). As the InternetNews version of the story makes clear, for all the talk about how this bill is about "less regulation," it's actually designed to increase some regulation by adding a number of other services that currently aren't really under the FCC's mandate -- like cable companies and VoIP services. If you recall, the mandate of the FCC is only supposed to be to regulate the public airwaves. That is, to manage this limited public resource to avoid problems. These new bills go well beyond "public resources" into regulating privately built networks and systems. While there are some things to like in this bill, it seems to tilt way too far in favor of simply supporting a few big incumbents.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Advertisment

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.