Partial Feeds, Glass Houses, And Things That Are Broken

from the what-does-one-have-to-do-with-the-other dept

Ok, while I generally like to avoid the random silly navel gazing debates within the blogworld, a few things all combined tonight in an amusing way -- and it seemed worth a post (if you disagree, and some of you will, sorry!). First of all, there's a long (painfully pointless) debate going on among a small group of people about whether or not bloggers should include the "full text" of their posts in the feed, or if it should just be a partial post that pushes people to load the actual page to read the whole thing. There are some people who claim they won't read a "partial feed," which seems a bit excessive. From our standpoint, obviously, we publish full content feeds, because we know people like them, and we'd rather our readers be happy than annoyed. Either way, tonight, it appears that SixApart's TypePad system was down for an extended period of time, just as I was going through my random set of assorted blogs I read... almost all of which publish partial feeds. I'd read a sentence and a half here or there, and then click to open, only to get a "page not found" in response. So, I was thinking that, indeed, partial feeds are a nuisance and a loss for those bloggers -- because I'm unlikely to go back and check out those stories later. The rationale for partial feeds doesn't make much sense, honestly. One reason often given is to force more people to see ads -- but, let's face it, the people reading your stuff via RSS are probably the least likely to click on your ads. The other reason is to avoid spam blogs repurposing your content -- but in our experience that's a pretty silly reason. Spam blogs that scrape and repurpose your content (and there are a ton that do that with ours) seem to disappear pretty quickly and don't actually detract from our site at all.

However, the thing that really set this post off was that I came across ZDNet's Steve Gillmor whining about Yahoo's Jeremy Zawodny's partial feeds. Normally this is exactly the type of post I wouldn't even read, but something seemed odd -- and it took me a few seconds to realize that two things didn't make sense. (1) I came across Steve's post in the ZDNet blogs RSS feed which (whoooooops!) is a partial text feed -- so, yes, his attempt to make fun of partial feeds is, indeed, cut off itself by his own partial feed. (2) I read Jeremy Zawodny's feed as well, and it's full text. So, here we have someone who has a partial feed complaining about the partial feed of someone who actually appears to only offer full feeds (the two on his site both appear to be full feeds). As for the "things that are broken" in the title, it's not just TypePad, but I tried to post a comment on Steve's ZDNet blog and was given a big fat error message instead. Looks like we still have a few kinks to work out with this whole blogging thing.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Kevin Mesiab, 16 Dec 2005 @ 3:32am

    partial vs full

    The real reason for partial feeds versus full feeds was a matter of bandwidth. Feeds began as a method of syndication in a one-to-many relationship.
    The purpose of truncating feeds is a matter of preserving bandwidth. This is because feeds are intended to be consumed in a much different manner than a typical webpage. Many aggregators and clients request and re-request a feed (which is itself an aggregate of many articles) with some degree frequency.
    Giving a client a summary of the article and the choice of reading the full text (and exercising the bandwidth of the provider) allows for a slightly more economical distribution of load.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Andrew Strasser, 16 Dec 2005 @ 5:21am

    Blog sites

    Of all the news and blog sites I go to this is actually one of my favorite ones. Partials blogs could be annoying if that were the case that the main server would go down. I would hope it'd be a much more stable enviornment than that, but then again you never know what who's thrown together in their garage. This story is just plain ludicrous really, funny though.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    data64, 16 Dec 2005 @ 5:31am

    Mobile devices

    One of the things I use RSS feeds is so that they can be converted into something that is actually viewable from a mobile device like the Blackberry. Not every blog provides a mobile friendly interface like Techdirt. Plus AvantGo is adding support for RSS feeds (finally).
    It is simple enought to write an RSS to html convertor, plus there are a lot of free ones available. I especially love the feed from Gizmodo that includes images as well as full article text.
    I really hate the one from CBC (cbc.ca) which only seems to have the headline and a link to the actual article, which is unusable from a mobile device.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Chris, 16 Dec 2005 @ 6:22am

    Naval gazing?

    Why are all of these bloggers staring at seafaring vessels?

    Oooohhh...I get it.

    I think you meant NAVEL-gazing. :)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 16 Dec 2005 @ 9:00am

      Re: Naval gazing?

      Dammit. :) I actually realized this as I woke up this morning, and I said "Oh man, I hope I didn't actually write "naval" but I'm pretty sure I did..." So I just rushed over to my computer to change it and hoped that no one noticed, but you did.

      Sorry! Thanks for pointing it out. It's fixed now.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mikester, 16 Dec 2005 @ 9:20am

    Popper

    This doesn't apply to feeds for mobile devices, but one thing I really like about the RSS Popper plug-in for Outlook is that it has the option to download the HTML page the RSS item links to, rather than just the text in the feed (or lack there of).
    Like data64 mentioned, CBC and a few other feeds only include the title and nothing more which I find extrememly annoying. This plug-in gets around that.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    John Dowdell, 16 Dec 2005 @ 2:51pm

    No Subject Given

    Partial feeds may be helpful if forced on many blog writers... they'd have to quickly get to the point.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Britt Brannan, 21 Mar 2011 @ 1:05am

    Shower Doors

    With the advancement and the change in living styles of people, there has been a dramatic change in people’s preferences. With the increased choices, the demands have also increased. Building a home is one of an asset which you probably will build once in a lifetime, as the choices has changed people want to go for things that are in fashion whether they are regarding clothes, cars, furniture, home, shower doors etc.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    viooz, 3 Jul 2015 @ 10:41am

    Agree with Britt Brannan. Modern world is amazing.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Viooz, 21 Jan 2016 @ 8:54am

    The purpose of truncating feeds is a matter of preserving bandwidth.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Richard Nichoras, 6 Aug 2016 @ 8:23am

    thanks for article

    Partial feeds may be helpful if forced on many blog writers... they'd have to quickly get to the point.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    north face, 6 Aug 2016 @ 8:25am

    i agree

    Agree with Britt Brannan. Modern world is amazing.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.