Why Average Revenue Per User Can Be Misleading

from the not-this-again dept

In the telco world, there's an ongoing infatuation with "ARPU" (Average Revenue Per User, for those just joining us). It's a stat that execs obsess over. Wall Street talks about which operators have the highest or lowest ARPUs and which direction the ARPU moves every quarter or year. ARPU can be useful in some ways, but the level to which it's relied on as an indicator of how successful an operator is can be quite problematic. Take, for example, a new study that is warning that while voice ARPU is declining and data ARPU is increasing for mobile operators, the increase in data ARPU isn't closing the gap created by the losses in voice ARPU. This leads to execs thinking that they need to figure out ways to quickly increase data ARPU or slow the decline in voice ARPU -- which could be a strategic mistake. First of all, as markets get more mature, operators are increasingly looking towards the margins to pick up new customers who have never had service before. In most cases, those subscribers are going to want cheap intro plans to see why it's worthwhile. In other words, those customers drive down ARPU, but increase incremental revenue. That should be good, but is seen as bad. Meanwhile, when it comes to data ARPU, the industry still hasn't done a great job convincing many users why or how they should use mobile data offerings. Keeping the barriers low helps to get more people experimenting and seeing the benefits of mobile data usage -- even if it keeps data ARPU low. Pushing up the rates too quickly means that you cut off a large segment of the potential market -- or open them up to a competitor who isn't as infatuated with meeting certain ARPU standards.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. icon
    Mike (profile), 16 Dec 2005 @ 9:12am

    Re: Why it's important

    I don't deny that it's a useful stat, but you have to admit that execs, Wall St. and analysts put WAY too much weight on it, without thinking about why it doesn't always make sense.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.