RSS
New York Considering Muni-WiFi?
from the isn't-there-enough? dept
It seems like these days every city feels the need to explore muni-WiFi. It's a hot political topic. As we've said repeatedly in the past, most of the efforts to stop muni-WiFi are coming from incumbent telcos (or, rather, incumbent-paid-for think tanks) with lots of misleading statements. However, that doesn't mean that muni-WiFi is absolutely a good thing in all situations. In many cases, it's probably unnecessary, and it still seems questionable to make use of WiFi in this manner, as it's not well designed for wide-area coverage. Yet, the latest to start exploring the idea of muni-WiFi is New York City. The arguments for universal access to broadband make sense, but I was just in Manhattan, and almost everywhere I went the problem wasn't too little WiFi, but too much. Where I was staying, I could spot nearly 30 access points. The problem there isn't that we need muni-WiFi, it's that all that WiFi causes plenty of interference and makes it nearly impossible for anyone to get on any of the access points. Muni-broadband can make sense in places where people aren't being offered service and can clearly use it. It's likely that there are parts of the city that don't have quite as much WiFi as the places I looked. It can make sense for the government to offer up real estate for access points or fiber to help provide broadband service -- but there needs to be a clear reason for them to do so. At the same time, they should make sure that the technology they decide to use really makes sense for the job it's being given.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Muni Wi-Fi
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
muni wifi
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Muni WiFi
it is a competitive market, ie, the city doesn't grant themselves a monopoly.
That should take care of concerns about the service becoming outdated or not meeting consumer needs. And you shouldn't have to give up your home network. It sure would be nice to be able to jump on the internet from anywhere - and have some choice about whose service to use.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Muni WiFI (especially New York)
Couple with GPS: where am I? how do I get from here to there? What can I buy near here? All the cool things that could (but aren't) being done with WiFi are magnified enormously in NYC.News and video coverage (including amateurs) would be greatly enhanced. And NY is more than Manhattan (in case anyone has forgotten). A city-wide mesh could easily be financed by location specific advertising.
Great idea.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Wifi
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Not necessarily WiFi
I specifically spoke about the need to evaluate ALL technology, wired AND wireless - and the benefits of specificially looing at MULTIPLE technologies. WiFi has benthe technology of choice, because it's easy to get up and running on a widesperad basis, and some of the folks doing this stuff are being rather clever about how they handle the problems, and sometiems even turn them into advantages. But, the people behind this bill are smart enough to know that just because Philadelphia chose this modl, as did smaller cities, ti does not man that it's the right thing in this type of city.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment