Wireless

by Mike Masnick




A Truly Interactive Mobile TV Test?

from the for-real? dept

Two things that haven't always made full sense to us here are all the various attempts (pre-dating the web, even) of offering "interactive TV" that were really "enhanced TV" and the efforts to create mobile broadcast TV. On the "interactive TV" efforts there wasn't any real "interaction," but users could do a little bit more than simply sit back and watch. As for mobile broadcast TV, it might have some niche appeal -- but in an age when people are used to time-shifting TV it's a lot more limited. More importantly, mobile phones are communications platforms first. The main reason people are buying them is to communicate with others. The content consumption features are nice, but in most cases secondary. So, even as wireless companies rush headlong to offer broadcast TV over mobile devices, it would seem that more interactive solutions are more likely to catch on. That's why it's interesting to see what appears to be a test of a mobile TV offering that includes some real interaction. The test, taking place in Norway, is with a music television show. It has the "standard" interactivity of letting people vote, but will also let viewers communicate with each other. This may not be a solution that does eventually catch on, but it's one of the first we've seen in a while that actually tries to take mobile TV further, by recognizing the core nature of the mobile device as a two-way communications platform.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Matt, 2 Dec 2005 @ 3:38pm

    Wobcast Type Application

    Yes, this is one potential application of 3G mobile...true participation TV. See www.wobcast.com

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Andrew Strasser, 2 Dec 2005 @ 11:17pm

    Why not just add the cell phone feature to our lap

    Simply put.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ivory Bill, 3 Dec 2005 @ 12:54am

      Re: Why not just add the cell phone feature to our

      The obvious solution to this specific problem is IPT over EV-DO.... but at least one provicer (Verizon) prohibits it. It will be interesting to see how long the prohibition lastss, as IPT is such an obvious solution.
      Methinks that the prohibiton will last until Verizon (or whoever) has two competitors for high-speed wireless in a given coverge area. At that point, max revenue per subscriber will become secondary to just keeping the customer.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Perry, 3 Dec 2005 @ 6:30am

    Content

    I worked at AT&T's Downtown Digital (NYC) where we were building shows for the Florida interactive trials in the very early 90's. To me, the content was always the weakest link. Until the "killer app" in interactive programming comes along ITV is something that will limp along and remain a footnote. The technology is there but why spend it on voting??? Why spend millions of dollars on ITV for voting when a phone call works just fine (American Idol).

    When you really think about it, people can not do two things at one time. They watch, and then the google that Prada purse after the show. No one wants to stop the flow of the "moment" to do something else. Not at least with shows. If TV gets away from the "story" model then we may see the killer app eventually emerge. I'd say 20 years away at least. When you think about it, how successful is Web TV? I know no one who uses that service. Is it even still around?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Joe Snuffy, 3 Dec 2005 @ 8:02am

      Re: Content

      I disagree with yor statement, "When you really think about it, people can not do two things at one time." I am almost always doing two differant things while watching TV. Usually surfing the net or playing BF2. Recently I started putting jigsaw puzzles together while watching TV. It's not the "we" can't do it. It's that "you" can't do it.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 3 Dec 2005 @ 11:45am

        Re: Content

        not only do i often do 2 things at once - watchin tv and surfing the web for example, i aslo regularly watch "tv" on the internet where i am able to see a number of shows that would otherwise be unavailable to me.

        I am doin exactly that right now as it goes !

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Perry, 6 Dec 2005 @ 10:31am

        Re: Content

        You are correct. "I" can not do two things at once.
        Sorry

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Adam, 4 Dec 2005 @ 5:48pm

      Re: Content

      WebTV was a very successfull platform for a number of years as I was a subscriber. WebTV is still around but now better known as MSNTV which has taken their set top boxes to a broader user base by incorporating broadband into their existing platform. I no longer use WebTV/MSNTV since I started to need more capabilities only found in a pc environment. But I do know a few people that still use it for internet access. If you do a basic google search on msntv or webtv you'll come up with many results with info and users who use the service and have built web sites of their own. But all in all it was just a cheap solution for internet without having the need for a computer.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Perry, 6 Dec 2005 @ 10:42am

        Re: Content

        Please don't miss my point. I can indeed walk and chew gum at the same time. However I only want to be ENGAGED IN one thing at a time. Sure I can have the tube as background like a cd or radio, but if I'm engaged in a movie or episode, I do not want to interupt the flow. Matter of fact, I tivo everything just so I can skip the ads for that very reason.

        But that's just me.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Caution: Copyright
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.