Bluespamming About To Get Much More Popular

from the and-they-wonder-why-they're-hated dept

While there are plenty of people who like to think that marketing is an evil profession, that's not true at all. Real marketing has tremendous value in figuring out what people want and how to deliver it to them. It's just that so many people do it so badly (and assume that marketing is more about telling people they want something they don't) that it has a terrible reputation. That's why you just have to cringe when some marketers do things so obviously bad that you just know it's going to continue the downward spiral of the view of what marketing really is about. A few weeks ago, we wrote about a test of a system in the UK called "Bluecasting" which was more accurately described as "Bluespamming", where terminals were set up to send commercial messages over Bluetooth to unsuspecting people passing by with Bluetooth-enabled mobile phones. The companies behind this plan insist it's fine because rather than just sending you the commercial message, they first spam you to ask you if it's okay if they send you a commercial message. For some reason, these folks then thought it was terrific that they only wasted the time of 85% of the people they spammed. Sure, compared to direct mail, that's a high return, but it's quite a different situation. Buzzing someone on their phone as they're walking through a train station is likely to really interrupt them as they're on their way somewhere. Yet, due to blind marketing-think, the folks behind it still are insisting it's wonderful and are expanding the program to bug even more people -- pretty much guaranteeing that most folks are going to start turning Bluetooth off on their phones. The people behind it are in denial about how annoying this really is. According to the manager of some airport lounges where this will be used: "I think it's done very well because it enables the customers [to choose]. It doesn't force it on them." But, it does force it on users -- by pinging them without permission to see if they want the ad. That's the spam. Being interrupted as they're trying to do something else. If it was really completely up to the user, they would just put up signs telling people they could request info or content on their phones using Bluetooth. But actively sending them messages via Bluetooth is intrusive and, to many, many people, clearly seen as spam.

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  • identicon
    ivalki, Aug 22nd, 2005 @ 1:47am


    thats simply amazing
    it just blew my hat off.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Beck, Aug 22nd, 2005 @ 5:37am


    "If it was really completely up to the user, they would just put up signs telling people they could request info or content on their phones using Bluetooth."

    Why don't they just put the information itself on the signs instead of sending the info to the phone? Then you can reach everyone who walks by, whether or not they have a bluetooth-enabled phone!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Hide this ad »
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Chat
Hide this ad »
Recent Stories
Advertisement - Amazon Prime Music
Hide this ad »


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.