Why The DMCA Was An Avoidable Failure (Or: How Politicians Work)

from the and-so-it-goes dept

There's an ongoing discussion of Fred von Lohmann's new paper about the failure of the DMCA (which, for some unknown reason is only being offered in pdf format) -- and Ed Felten picks up on an important point that we've tried to highlight here in the past. von Lohmann notes that the DMCA is clearly a failure based on what it was originally supposed to do, and Felten responds by noting that it was easy to see how the DMCA would fail in its stated goals from the very beginning -- and yet it became law anyway. Felten believes that Congress simply ignored the reasons why it would fail -- as it wasn't that hard to see them. This is, as you know, par for the course for politicians. They pass laws that make them look good in soundbites rather than which will actually solve complex problems. Sometimes, they do so knowing that the legislation doesn't actually solve the problem, but saying the need to do "something." One clear indication of this is that politicians never seem to pass laws that involve real metrics to measure the success or failure based on the stated purpose of the law -- and they absolutely never have a "Plan B." In business, when you come up with a strategy to change something, you have milestones and metrics -- as well as having additional plans in place, should the first one fail. Ed Felten asks for ideas on: "how our policymakers can avoid making this kind of mistake again." Unfortunately there isn't a clear answer right now. In a world were politics is done by soundbite, context and details mean nothing.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Adam Szymczak, 16 Aug 2005 @ 5:59am

    Re: No Subject Given

    Want to reconsider that statement?

    Portable Document Format at Wikipedia

    Adobe PDF

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.