eTextbook Publisher Eases Restrictions Ever So Slightly

from the somewhat-more-palatable dept

Following the reports earlier this week that an e-textbook publisher was going to start selling heavily restricted e-textbooks at certain universities, there was a widespread discussion pointing out that the restrictions were onerous. The company, of course, can do whatever it wants, but it certainly seemed like the deal offered wasn't a very good one. The e-book company, to their credit, has responded to a lot of these complaints and is easing some of the restrictions -- though there are still huge tradeoffs. The five month expiration date will be expanded to a minimum 12 months, with the possibility of no expiration date at all. The limitation on printing just a little bit at a time will be loosened as well. This might ease some concerns, but it still seems like overkill. Users will still have to read the books on only one computer and won't be able to "sell back" or "return" the book. It seems like they could do away with that as well. If they're limiting it to a single computer in order to make it seem more like a tangible book, then why not include a feature that would let you transfer it to another computer or sell it back. If the concept of "selling back" an electronic textbook seems odd, realize that's exactly the same way many people feel about an e-book that expires and is limited to only one computer -- restrictions that make the book much less valuable to a potential buyer.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    school squirrel, 12 Aug 2005 @ 4:02pm

    Textbooks, electronic publishing

    What is the reason that a professor needs to pay to have a textbook published? Hasn't this whole discussion missed the point that there is no paper? There no capital plant and press needed? The only thing that needs to be done here is for an authority to determine what is to go into the text, someone masters it on their PC and you copy disks? The publisher is just a huge waste here now.

    The only excuse the music and video and movie industry has to use is that there are large costs of producing video and movie contentl. That requires a plant and a studio, etc. The music industry barely has an excuse nowdays, for the publishers to be there, in that there could be an industry to advertise and capitalize on the music entertainment, and that requires some sort of assets (marketing, advertising, etc) to pursue that.

    When I was at the University of Missouri, Rolla, my advisor had written an excellent text for the communication class (electrical engineering) and he simply ran off copies on the copier.

    I realize that not all professors write textbooks, but many do and probably get some income from it. However, there is way too much made here to not have the texts simply ignored that are from publishers who don't have a clue.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.