FCC Continues To Overreact To VoIP 911 Issue

from the cutting-people-off? dept

It's amazing how a little hype can make a bunch of government officials overreact. There was a lot of press coverage earlier this year of a few cases where 911 service over VoIP connections didn't work properly. That is, to be sure, an issue that should be dealt with, but the FCC seems to be going a bit overboard. First they mandated an amazingly short deadline for VoIP providers to be fully E911 compliant. Part of that ruling was that VoIP providers need to inform their customers clearly about the differences in VoIP 911 service and regular 911 service -- and get acknowledgment from the users that they had been informed. I've already received emails and letters from my VoIP provider on this, requiring me to sign in a click a check box somewhere. This is already annoying some users who feel they've already made it clear they know what kind of 911 service they get from their VoIP provider and don't want to be hassled to say so again. While the FCC did push back (by one month) the deadline for VoIP service providers to get a response from everyone, they also have announced that anyone who has not responded by August 29th will be cut off from their VoIP service. Yes, even if the VoIP provider is completely E911 compliant and it will work great, if the customer has not acknowledged they know about this, they have to be turned off. As Jeff Pulver notes very few mobile operators provide E911 yet -- and the FCC isn't telling them to notify people or turn customers off. Under this ruling, a customer who has perfect E911 service on their VoIP, but doesn't acknowledge it, will lose his account -- after which he or she can use a mobile phone in emergencies even though it might not have E911 set up. However, because all of the hype is focused on VoIP (and because the mobile operators have a tremendous amount of lobbying clout, which the VoIP providers have yet to build up) it's the VoIP systems that get punished.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Jul 2005 @ 12:07pm

    No Subject Given

    It isn't really about E911, it's more about protecting the status quo and control.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    DV Henkel-Wallace, 27 Jul 2005 @ 2:45pm

    Taxes

    AC mostly has it right. Mike: the real issue here is taxes. Right now VOIP is untaxable. This is causing the states and municipalities to scream. Mobile operators are taxed. This is a step to bring them under the same FCC umbrella, since congress is not doing it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.