Say That Again

by Mike Masnick




Is A Denial Of Service Attack Ethical Because The Company That Does Them Says So

from the seems-a-bit-questionable dept

We saw all the stories yesterday about the "new" anti-spam system that would launch a denial of service attack on spammers and figured it wasn't really worth mentioning, because we'd already covered this topic back when much more recognizable companies Lycos and IBM experimented with similar offerings. So, while it was amusing to see trade publications call this late-to-the-game effort "dumb as a bag of hammers," it didn't seem all that interesting. This morning, however, it was amusing to see someone named Rob submit a link to an article that seems to have believed every marketing statement coming out of the company, and crowned it as "a do-not-spam registry that might work." However, the part that caught my attention was the claim in the article that, despite the concerns of just about everyone else who commented on this plan, the system of vigilante attacks on spammers was "ethical." Why? Because the company's CEO told them so. The problem, of course, with any of these systems is that there is no recourse for a site that gets knocked out by this system. So, any smart spammer will simply start spamvertising sites of people he doesn't like -- leading them all to get a denial of service attack from this so-called "ethical" system. The CEO says that won't happen because his company's staff monitors what sites are being hit -- but that just makes them the private, unaccountable judge, jury and executioner of sites they don't like.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Kevin Murphy, 20 Jul 2005 @ 12:22pm

    No Subject Given

    Thanks for the cbronline.com link, Mike. Some thoughts on your commentary...
    The difference between a reporter and a blogger is that reporters report stuff whether they happen to agree with it or not.
    I addressed ethics directly in two sentences: "Blue chief executive Eran Reshef told ComputerWire that the system is ethical" and "Reshef said he believes the system to be ethical."
    I didn't report "The system is ethical" or "The system is unethical". I'll leave that kind of opinion stuff to bloggers like yourself, Mike.
    As for the headline "A do-not-spam registry that might work", I stand by it. Previous ideas, such as the ones investigated by the FTC, would not work.
    This one *might*. As opposed to *will*, which seems to be your reading of it.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.