by Mike Masnick

Even Book Publishers Are Cracking Down On Pre-Release Copies?

from the if-that's-their-biggest-worry... dept

We've heard plenty of stories about how the movie industry was freaking out about sending out "screener" copies of DVDs for the Academy Awards leading them to do things like send special DVDs that can only be played in special players or ban the use of screeners completely. However, would you ever expect the book industry to do the same thing? It's not digital copies they're worried about -- but apparently some publishers are so worried about the "secondary market" of people selling their review copies on eBay that they've trying to limit the practice. Copyfight notes that Neil Gaiman claims HarperCollins has only sent out 450 pre-release copies of his new book and each one is individually numbered to track it. This, clearly, isn't an across the board policy at Harper Collins as I have a package from them on my desk with a pre-release review copy that I received on Friday. Amusingly, it's a book where I already have a copy (I know the author, and he gave it to me personally), but as far as I can tell, the book has no specific numbering on it -- so this must be a more specialized case. Either way, you have to wonder what HarperCollins is really concerned about? Are there really going to be so many lost sales because some people sell the pre-release copies? Book publishers certainly have a history of not really understanding the internet, but this seems a bit ridiculous.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  • identicon
    Paul TS Lee, 14 Jun 2005 @ 10:19am

    wherefore the review copies

    Gaiman notes in yesterday's entry of his blog/journal that this 450 limit means that he only gets one copy of the proof, and can't give them out personally as he sees fit.

    In the same post, he also notes that the proofs of Anansi Boys that have already shown up on eBay are labeled as "unread", which seems (to me) to defeat the purpose of these proofs. Perhaps HarperCollins should include a little quiz with each copy, on which the reviewer must at least get a passing grade before being allowed to "dispose" of the proof in whatever way s/he sees fit.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.