Why Patents May Be Inefficient In Emerging Markets -- An Economic Analysis

from the lots-to-think-about dept

One of the things I've had trouble understanding is why some strong "free market, anti-government regulation" types are so in favor of strong intellectual property laws. It seems like the opposite of their position. Intellectual property laws, by their very nature, involve government regulations granting a full monopoly to one individual or company. However, there's this ongoing belief that the incentive of intellectual property protection is necessary to ensure creation -- even if increasing evidence shows that isn't really true. However, it's an area that could certainly use more feedback from an economic perspective, and it looks like more thoughtful analysis is on the way. Ed Felten points to Tim Wu's latest paper that tries to create a model for determining a beneficial outcome to intellectual property laws from a more economic viewpoint. The paper is a bit on the academic side, but still worth a read. There are some ideas that seem a bit simplified and could use further analysis (which is likely forthcoming, either from Wu or someone else), but it notes that with emerging markets, intellectual property laws make the least sense -- because you want to encourage as much widespread experimentation on new ideas as possible, so the real market innovation can take place and the overall economic benefit is increased. That is, just having a new idea or invention (what gets patented) doesn't mean it's really marketable. But, but letting everyone build off of the idea and create something that truly contributes to the economy, a better economic result occurs. This is also why bubble investing can be a good thing for the overall economy. It's a better, more efficient way to test out a lot of ideas quickly in an uncertain market. Yes, there are some losers, but the overall economy is better off. Patents, however, tend to limit those emerging markets by putting up inefficiencies in the way that make it much more expensive to experiment with the new ideas and find a way to market them. This idea isn't just backed up by theory -- but in practice as well. It's why the economies of the Netherlands and Switzerland both developed much faster in a time when they had no patents. It's good to see a more thorough exploration of these ideas -- and hopefully some of it will eventually sink into the heads of policy makers as well.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    dorpus, 7 Jun 2005 @ 11:51pm

    Misrepresentation

    If others make shoddy, unsafe, or immoral products in the name of another brand, then it would harm the brand's image. If someone were to start a kiddy porn site called techdirt4kids.com, you probably wouldn't like that.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      John, 8 Jun 2005 @ 12:15am

      Re: Misrepresentation

      Man. Do you ever post anything with an ounce of understanding what you're talking about?

      Trademark infringement is something that's totally different, involving confusion of brand -- which has nothing to do with things like patents. But, of course, why would you bother to understand the difference. That would make your post on topic and you never do that.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      thecaptain, 8 Jun 2005 @ 5:08am

      Re: Misrepresentation

      LOL...good one.

      Finally you're back to decent trolling. That totally off-topic japan news crap is totally beneath your level of skill. I mean we can't get rid of you...but if you're going to do it..at LEAST put some effort into it.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      sick, 8 Jun 2005 @ 6:35am

      Re: Misrepresentation

      patents...for brand names or URLs...uh....

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Gaurav Agarwal, 8 Jun 2005 @ 12:02am

    No Subject Given

    That is where Creative Commons come into picture, you can protect your work from being displayed as somebody else's and allow free usage of the same at the same time.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mr. Econotarian, 8 Jun 2005 @ 10:52am

    No Subject Given

    Looking at the particular example of patent laws, especially for products whose up-front costs are much higher than production costs (such as drugs), the greatest risk is not that unlicensed production in developing countries will lead to economic loss, but that unlicensed production in developing countries will be shipped back to developing countries, greatly depressing the returns on research investment.

    On the other hand, what happens if someone in a developing country comes up with a patenable good that will sell very well in a developed country? Then that inventor may lose out to unlicensed producers in the developing country who export to a developed country.

    I do agree though that intellectual property law should not be absolute and trade-offs need to be carefully looked at. I think that many developed countries have over-specified the optimal level of intellectual property laws, especially when it comes to copyright length.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.