The Free 25 Songs That Aren't

from the not-quite dept

It looks like RealNetworks has decided to copy Napster and offer a "To Go" service for their Rhapsody music subscription offering. Of course, since the various online music stores can't agree on a standard technology, you're fairly limited in exactly where those songs can actually "go." At the same time, just like with Napster, anyone who stops paying loses all access to the songs they downloaded -- which isn't very appealing. It shouldn't be long, though, until someone figures out how to free up those songs. In the meantime, the marketing promotion that RealNetworks has decided to go with is to hype up the fact that they're now offering 25 free songs per month for non-subscribers. The details, however, show that it's not 25 free songs -- but 25 free song listens. In other words, you can download a single song and listen to it 25 times, or listen to 25 different songs -- and you've used up your quota. Not quite as interesting as actually offering 25 free songs. In the Reuters story on this new service, there's a confusing statement that "costs for running the service will be offset by Real's business relationship with Google Inc. and a new sponsorship pact with DaimlerChrysler's Chrysler." So, on top of subscription fees and limited uses for the rented music, you can also expect plenty of ads.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Michael, 26 Apr 2005 @ 1:33pm

    I just don't understand

    you state
    >>anyone who stops paying loses all access to the songs they downloaded -- which isn't very appealing

    Why? This is a rental deal. If you cancel your NetFlix account, do they let you keep the movies you have?
    And you are quite free to buy the tracks you want to, just like you can buy the movies you like and want to keep.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mike, 26 Apr 2005 @ 1:38pm

    oops

    "isn't very appealing (especially ."

    Looks like you started to say something parenthetically and didn't go back to it; what were you going to say?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Apr 2005 @ 2:33pm

      Re: oops

      I know what Mike is saying here: In complaining yet again about companies trying to actually make money from providing a service, he is implicitly suggesting that people go to Kazaa and Bittorrent and just d/l the files for free. You're so transparent dude!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Mike (profile), 26 Apr 2005 @ 2:51pm

        Re: oops

        No. Actually, I don't think people should be downloading unauthorized files from Kazaa or BitTorrent. I don't, and would never recommend that others do.

        What I do think, is that these companies that are offering services that are only going to upset users are going to piss them off in a way that they *do* end up going to these services, which they shouldn't be using for those files. What the industry needs to do is figure out a way to offer people *what they want* and do it in a way that makes them money.

        Instead, they're trying to offer people exactly what they don't want, and then complaining when it doesn't work.

        Our perspective here is actually very much from the business side of the industry and what they should be doing to *save* their companies.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2005 @ 12:47pm

          BIG FAT NON ISSUE


          This is all really a non-issue b/c real networks FREE products suck so bad that I highly doubt they can susatain this pathetic " deal ".

          Real Networks products take over operating systems and most people hate it.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.