by Mike Masnick

The Company That Spyware Built

from the try,-try-again dept

Claria is still trying to refine its image and its business model. A year and a half ago they started threatening anyone who called their software spyware and then changed their name to Claria to avoid the negative stigma associated with the Gator name. While they tried and failed to go public last year, they're still trying to clean up their image. This would be a good thing, as their image needs cleaning up... except it still seems somewhat sketchy. They're outlining a detailed plan to basically do targeted advertising arbitrage. Here's how the plan works: they buy super super cheap run of site leftover ad inventory from large publishers for next to nothing. Then, they turn around and resell that ad space as much more costly, highly targeted ad space, and clean up on the difference. How can they do this? Well, thanks to the fact that their application is already installed on so many computers, they have all this data about how and where people surf. This is the part that the article sort of glosses over. Because they've been able to get this... hmm... let's call it "monitorware" on so many computers (often without the owners of said computers knowing about it), they're in a position to do this. So, this isn't so much "cleaning up their act," as leveraging their past misdeeds (installing an app that records what you do and sends it back to their servers without adequately revealing to the end user what was happening) to make themselves look like a more legitimate business. That, in some ways, seems much, much worse. In the past, attempts at similar offerings have met with outrage from users who don't feel comfortable being targeted in this manner. It's not clear why Claria thinks it'll be fine this time.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. icon
    Mike (profile), 15 Feb 2005 @ 11:20am

    Re: Cleaning Up?

    Claria/Gator " doings " ARE NOT news.
    Its a thinly designed marketing campaign to get sites like Techdirt to feed us their swill.

    What was news was CNET claiming this was them cleaning up their act, which the post here was trying to show was not the case at all. I find it hard to believe that Claria thinks the post written here is good for "marketing" since it basically picks apart why what they're doing is bad...

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.