MP3tunes Launches Without Label Support, Or Very Much Compelling At All

from the hello-publicity-stunt dept

As expected, Michael Robertson has launched his new music download store that doesn't use any copy protection at all, and offers straight MP3s at $0.88 a pop. Of course, also as expected, none of the major labels were willing to work with him, so it's all independent bands. That's cool in the sense of supporting indie acts, but might make it more difficult to attract actual users. In fact, it's really not that different from a few other sites, like eMusic. While, to some extent, he's simply trying to force the issue concerning copy protection with all the big name music download stores, it's unlikely they'll care very much here, because they won't see it as competition at all (unless they've been reading a lot of Chris Anderson's writings lately). Also, it's not clear how much indie bands really stand to benefit from this service either. The smaller independent bands are better off building up a big fan base, and many more bands are realizing you do that by getting more people to hear your music -- and that means sharing the music, not charging for every song. So, while it's a nice idea, it's unclear if it's actually going to matter much in the long run.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2005 @ 10:37am

    No Subject Given

    Typo, mike: use not sue

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Mike (profile), 9 Feb 2005 @ 12:57pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    Whoops! Fixed. Thanks!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Permanent4, 9 Feb 2005 @ 3:22pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    Considering Michael Robertson is involved, using the word "sue" seems appropriate.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.