Federal Judge Dumps Pennsylvania ISP Porn Blocking Law

from the too-much-collateral-damage dept

We've written before about a Pennsylvania law that required ISPs to block anyone from accessing child porn. There were obvious problems with this law. It's good that Pennsylvania wants to stop child porn, but putting the burden on the ISPs is the wrong way to go. ISPs, of course, are just the pipe. They shouldn't have to worry about what their users are, or are not, accessing. It was also problematic that Pennsylvania was using a ban-list that no one was allowed to review to make sure it was fair. The biggest problem, however, was that ISPs blocking sites ended up blocking other, perfectly legitimate sites that were simply hosted on shared servers. Now, a federal judge has decided that's simply too big a cost and has said the law needs to go. What still doesn't make sense, is that if Pennsylvania was able to identify all of these child porn sites, why were they wasting time getting ISPs to block them, rather than going after those who were actually responsible for running and hosting the sites, and get them taken down that way?

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  • identicon
    dorpus, Sep 10th, 2004 @ 10:40am

    4-fingered ham fists

    Pennsylvania should be outlawing incivility like this.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Chomper, Sep 10th, 2004 @ 1:16pm

      Re: 4-fingered ham fists

      Maybe she shouldn't have been so dumb as getting too close to the President?

      WTF do people expect the Secret Service to do?!?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    aReader(), Sep 10th, 2004 @ 1:07pm

    No Subject Given

    May be the state/country did not have the jurisdiction at the places where the sites were hosted. I wonder why it took so much of time to decide that these laws should go. This case is very similar to the music industry lawsuits where ISP is not responsible for what users do or where they download from.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    BRS, May 26th, 2009 @ 6:12pm

    4-fingered ham fists / LOL / hope not

    Putting the burden on the ISPs is NOT the wrong way to go.
    They are the front line in this!
    Maybe having all internet sites on a rating system to act as a filter for ISPs?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    LM, Nov 2nd, 2009 @ 10:58am

    what's the name of the case?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Hide this ad »
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Chat
Hide this ad »
Recent Stories
Advertisement - Amazon Prime Music
Hide this ad »


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.