Wall Street's Google FUD

from the how-it-all-works dept

Before Google officially announced their IPO and it was only rumored that they would do an auction style IPO, we noted that the banks would flip out about this, and do whatever they could to stop it. Ever since the rumors first came out, Wall Street has cranked up the PR buzz to suggest that Dutch auction IPOs are bad news. Then, once Google finally did announce their plans to go public, even the banks taking part have started complaining about it and suggesting that people not invest in the IPO. Anyone who knows anything about Wall Street knew this would happen. Unfortunately, plenty of people don't know anything about Wall Street, and still aren't skeptical despite the years of bad advice people have received from bankers. So, it's good that at least someone has written a piece detailing what we've been saying for a while (and thanks to the anonymous submitter who point this out to us): Wall Street is doing everything possible to make Google look bad so no other uppity company gets the idea to actually price their shares at a market price, rather than leaving a big pile of money on the table for the bankers and their friends. Now, it is true that the auction process has its problems as well. It's not the perfect solution. However, it certainly sounds better than selling shares to an underwriter at $10 who passes it on to their friends to flip that same day at $90, as happened during the boom years. Investment bankers purposely underprice shares, which is bad for the company selling shares. The auction may tend to overprice shares (which could be bad for investors buying into it), but it doesn't leave money on the table for the company going public.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    4-80-sicks, 21 Dec 2007 @ 6:21am

    Re: Google's Last Stand at the Enron Coral

    I wonder if what the previous poster thinks about Google now, although he seems to have been a prime example of the subject of this article. Would he recant his hyperbole? Three and a half years is a long time to be wrong every day...

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Advertisment

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.