by Mike Masnick

The Dirty Data Saga Continues: Newspapers Doing More Damage Than Good

from the without-readers,-there-aren't-many-advertisers dept

Adam Penenberg has already taken on the NY Times for becoming less relevant to people today, due to their "behind the registration wall" news concept. Now, he's picking up on the dirty data concept and admitting that he usually lies when registering for any news site, in part because those sites never give users anything of value in return for all your personal information. Penenberg took a very unscientific sample poll among people he knew, and it appears that most of the provide bogus information or use the two best tools on the internet for actually being able to read news: BugMeNot and Mailinator. Of course, the response from the registration required sites is always the same. They "need" to do this to give their advertisers more targeted info, so they can sell higher priced ads. However, there are two very major problems (which almost everyone sees, except those working on registration required sites): (1) if the data is bad, the advertisers may get suckered a few times into paying higher fees, but not for long and (2) if readers keep getting pissed off and just decide to go elsewhere, there won't be anyone's eyeballs to sell to advertisers anyway. Requiring registration is a short term strategy. It shrinks inventory and gives advertisers a fake reason to spend more. The end result is that advertisers will learn. They'll refuse to spend so much, and the sites will be stuck with lower traffic levels. How that makes sense long term is beyond me.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  • identicon
    Cameron Simpson, 4 Aug 2004 @ 7:45pm

    on lying to registered news sites

    Was thinking about this this morning.
    While the lying does indeed dirty the data a little info may be gleaned just from who reads what articles. Probably not a lot though, and of course there's the whole dubious "selling readers' habits to others" thing, about which registering sites probably don't give a damn.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Greg Linden, 4 Aug 2004 @ 10:12pm

    Registration should be unnecessary

    What I find most frustrating about mandatory registration is that it should be unnecessary. Random sampling and geolocation can provide a survey of the demographic profile of the newspaper's online audience. And, by analyzing page content or by tracking pages viewed by a specific user, targeted advertising will provide higher clickthroughs than advertising based on vague, incomplete, and often incorrect demographic data.
    Newspapers need to focus on driving traffic and revenue on their websites, not driving people away with lengthy and invasive registration forms.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.