More Folks Agree To Pay RIAA's Extortion Rates
from the pay-up-or-else dept
The RIAA continues their PR (not legal) campaign against file sharing by announcing that 63 more people have agreed to settle with the RIAA and pay up for sharing music. On top of the 12-year-old girl, this makes a total of 64 people. 12 of those settlers weren't even sued, but had simply found out that the RIAA had sent out a subpoena for their info. They don't say how much the settlements were for, but other stories on the matter suggest that the RIAA comes in with a "take-it-or-see-you-in-court" offer of a few thousand dollars. Meanwhile, they're also claiming that nearly 1,000 people have taken them up on their worthless "amnesty" offer, that says they really really promise to leave you alone if you really really promise to stop sharing music.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
agreed?
Which ISPs agreed to it? and who gave them the authority to represent the rest of the ISPs?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: agreed?
So, the agreement was that the content providers could send the ISPs a "takedown notice" or a subpoena for info and everything would be okay. The big ISPs agreed.
The issue was never that ALL ISPs needed to agree, but the ones with enough clout to hold back passage of the law.
None of this, by the way, had much to do with file sharing. Much of the current ISP complaints say that that original agreement was about posting stuff to a website that was hosted by the ISP. They say that stuff hosted on a home computer, but accessed via the ISP shouldn't count.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: agreed?
-The same AC
Techdirt's a great site. Keep up the good work!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Extortion
I would rather never listen to recorded music again than in any way support these greedy, money-mongering drones who comprise the RIAA.
Stealing is reprehensible but the underlying cause is the way in which RIAA members package and price recorded music. The courts are inadvertently but effectively supporting gouging by RIAA members.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Extortion
I went through a sampling of my albums and found that over 95% of them are not from RIAA supporters. And, almost invariably, the few CDs that were put out by RIAA members I had bought used - meaning they didn't get any of my money anyway.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Extortion
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Extortion
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment
Add A Reply