Do These Technologies Deserve To Die?

from the seems-a-bit-extreme dept

Well known author Bruce Sterling has written up an article for MIT's Technology Review suggesting ten technologies that deserve to die. These are technologies, he says, that "are so blatantly obnoxious that the human race would rejoice if they were obliterated" and suggests that most are "obsolete technologies that are the dangerous hangovers of previous, less advanced generations." While I'm sure everyone could come up with their own such list, I think there are quite a few on Sterling's list that might surprise you. He suggests nuclear weapons have to go, as these days, they're only really useful for terrorists. Internal combustion engine? Out. Prisons aren't worthwhile, he says, when you can just monitor people wherever they are already. Others listed include manned spaceflight (bad for the body, little reason to bother), cosmetic implants (why not grow natural stuff instead of synthetic materials) and lie detectors (they don't work). Finally, he says that DVDs are "collateral damage to consumers in the entertainment industry's miserable, endless war of attrition with digital media." He says that DVDs have the downsides of piracy without the upsides of free, simple distribution. As you can see, a lot these ideas are a bit optimistic about how things will move forward over the next few years. I think he's overreacting a bit about the down sides to certain technologies. People are less interested in the downsides of the technology, than the potential benefits for themselves - and as such, most of these technologies aren't going anywhere in the near future.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    westpac, 30 Sep 2003 @ 6:44am

    wrong on several counts

    If anyone thinks that nuclear weapons aren't the epitome of Teddy Roosevelt's big stick, they need to go study their history a little closer. Israel's possession of nukes has kept Egypt and Syria in check for thirty years now simply because they know Israel will use their nuclear arsenal. Pakistan's possession of nuclear warheads probably prevented another border rumble with India recently. India has far more to lose than Pakistan in an atomic war.

    The nuke is the modern eqivalent of the "fleet in being." In WW II Germany only possessed a few capital ships, but their mere existence pinned down the bulk of the Royal Navy for most of the war with the need to contain them. Outside of the destruction of HMS Hood the German battleships contributed little materially to the war except preventing the British from transferring forces to the Mediterranean and the far east.

    Imagine if Iraq had nukes in 1990. Kuwait would still belong to Saddam Hussein because an invasion would have been out of the question. Saudi Arabia would never have allowed the US to use it's territory as staging areas for the invasion with the prospect of Riyadh or Mecca being reduced to a glowing fog of atoms.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Advertisment

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.