IBM's Answer To Palladium

from the just-gets-worse dept

Having just complained about how digital rights management is not the answer, I come across this following story about how IBM is about to launch a big digital rights management push. Called "extensible Content Protection" (xCP), it sounds like it's IBM's answer to Microsoft's "Trusted Computing", er... Palladium, um... I mean, "Next-Generation Secure Computing Base". The idea is that it would let you access content on your home network, but if you dared to let it escape into the wild all hell would break loose (or, at least, the content would no longer work). They say they'll embed the software everywhere and seem to think that people will want to buy things that make their content less valuable. They also mention, in passing, that this DRM solution will let content owners "track" the usage of the content. Great. So, IBM is building a giant system to lessen the value of our computers while also adding in a giant spyware system. Sign me up! Why is everyone so focused on locking up content rather than taking advantage of the very nature of digital goods and digital distribution? Once again, this is a solution that will not stop real "piracy" - but will make ordinary users' lives more difficult.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    anon, 17 Sep 2003 @ 2:32pm

    No Subject Given

    The one thing you do not understand is IBM is not interested in selling this to the end Users. Hence the need not to care what they think.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.