Companies Develop Camera Phone Policies

from the blame-technologies-or-users'-actions? dept

Found over at Alan Reiter's wireless blog is the news that more companies are coming up with human resource policies concerning camera phones (telling them, basically, that using a camera phone to take "sexually revealing" photos of co-workers is wrong). Alan Reiter thinks this is a good thing, and that companies should all be writing such policies. Personally, I think it's going a bit overboard. If companies need to write up new HR policies for every new technology that comes down the road, they're going to be a lot of busy policy writers out there. I don't see why the policies can't be general enough to cover things like this. Clearly, violating the privacy of a co-worker or doing anything that makes for an uncomfortable work environment for others shouldn't be tolerated. Specifically singling out camera phones is paying too much attention to the technology, and not enough on the actions.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Sep 2003 @ 7:16am

    No Subject Given

    I have a co-worker who is young and parties frequently. He takes his camera phone along and then uploads all the " boobie shots " up to a webpage. Monday mornings have become much more enjoyable since he bought a camera phone.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Oliver Wendell Jones, 2 Sep 2003 @ 8:36am

    It's not about the phones

    Imagine you work in an office and there is one guy who always carries a camera (film or digital, doesn't matter) and is always holding it under the table at meetings, etc.

    People are going to figure out he's some kind of perv and avoid him.

    But, what if instead that same guy (prior to picking up a reputation as a perv) gets a camera phone and every once in a while during a meeting does that little 'my cell phone is vibrating' jerk and reaches in his pocket, discretely keeps his phone below the surface of the table like he's checking to see who is calling and then puts it back in his pocket.

    Are people going to suspect he's a perv? Probably not.

    If you see someone manipulating a camera it's a safe bet they're taking a picture and you can cover your face, cross your legs, etc. If you see that same person maniuplating a cell phone you have no reason to assume they're taking a picture.

    That's the problem with cell phone cameras.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 2 Sep 2003 @ 9:21am

      Re: It's not about the phones

      Doesn't change the issue. It's the actions that are the problem, not the phone itself.

      How does having a policy in place change any of what you wrote?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        itchyfish, 2 Sep 2003 @ 3:53pm

        Re: It's not about the phones

        Policies are in created in order fisrt and foremost to protect the company. If there's an occasional side effect of actually protecting employess, then it's a happy coincidence.

        If a company has a policiy in place forbidding cell phones cams, then when a perv posts the "under table panty shots" gets caught by someone who doesn't like them, they're protected. "We have a policy against that, you're (picture taker) fired and you (the outraged party) can't sue us."

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.