Disney Investigating The MVNO Business

MVNO (mobile virtual network operators, if you haven't been following the space) are when a non-carrer company (usually some sort of consumer or entertainment brand) does a deal with a wireless carrier to offer a "new" wireless service under their own brand. The real wireless carrier handles all the technology, and the "brand" handles all the marketing. For years, I could not understand why MVNOs weren't more popular in the US (or, even, in existence at all). Now, as Virgin Mobile US seems to be doing pretty well with their MVNO offering Disney is exploring the possibility of setting up their own MVNOs for their various brands, including ESPN. The article linked here is summarizing a (paid subscription only) article in the Wall Street Journal which also says that Qwest is talking to Sprint PCS about using Sprint's celllular network. The details aren't entirely clear, but it would be intersting if Qwest (who has a very weak cellular offering) was also going the MVNO route. That might not be the case, as they may just be using Sprint's network, and doing all the rest themselves - but it would be interesting to see what would happen if other telecom firms went the MVNO route. Why bother doing the heavy lifting yourself, if someone else will do it for you? Of course the obvious answer to my own question is that people don't want to share revenue. However, if a company is much better and more efficient at handling a cellular network, doesn't it make sense? It can almost be seen as the same thing as having Amazon.com handle the backend technology for a variety of other e-commerce sites, including their "competitor", Borders Books.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.