by Mike Masnick

Samsung Bans Camera Phones In The Workplace

from the gotta-ship-'em-out-the-door...-not-in dept

Emily Turrettini discovered that Samsung, makers of quite a lot of camera phones, are now banning them in their own factories, as they're afraid that people will use them for corporate espionage. The link that Emily originally included is now gone, but another story has the details including an answer to my first question: the factory that makes camera phones will not have the ban enforced. Seems like an over-reaction, but the number of such "mobile phones banned!" stories seems to be showing up at an increasing rate. It will be interesting to see if the resulting bans lessen the adoption rates of such phones, as people will realize there are additional tradeoffs.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Jul 2003 @ 1:33am

    The post-celebrity era?

    In an era when the common person increasingly receives unwanted fame from ubiquitous surveillance devices, will people come to despise the institution of celebrity? People living in tourist locations did not like it when tourists came up to them and took pictures, like they were some sort of exotic zoo specimen. Could we not see a new social phenomenon wherein groups of malevolent paparazzi spontaneously decide to scandalize a random person?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    mark, 7 Jul 2003 @ 7:29am

    camera phones

    For years corporations and insitutions have been just fine with invading our lives and privacy with their agenda whether it be video survilance or passive-aggressively ramming sponsorship of publlic events down our throats. Increasing, the playing field is being leveled and I have zero simpathy for the big players who get slapped because tech that used to be expensive finds it's way into the hands of the commoners.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      munich, 7 Jul 2003 @ 10:10am

      Re: camera phones

      Yeah, Samsung has really invaded a lot of people's lives...Get real.

      The ban is a bit silly from a espionage stanpoint, but makes sense from a corporate governance standpoint.

      If someone wants to do corporate spying, a ban on the cellphones isn't going to stop them. The real reason for any corporate ban would likely to avoid lawsuits by employees for imappropriate use by other employees. For example, if Cletus uses his phone to look up Marge's skirt while at work. With a corporate ban in place, the company is protected from Marge's lawsuit and Cletus can be fired. Without one, Marge can probably sue the company creating a "hostile workplace".

      Although in Korea Samsung doesn't have to really worry about this, it will probably be a trend in the U.S.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 7 Jul 2003 @ 7:22pm

        Re: camera phones

        A few years back, Motorola's Cellular Sector had a policy of banning all cell phones from their sector facilities - you were to leave them at the guards desk when coming in. The main problem was theft from the factorys. The ban was widely derided and poorly enforced. Customers, vendors, white collar employees, and especially management were commonly seen walking around talking away, and pocketing the phones on their way past the guard.
        The main enforcement effort landed on the hourly factory workers. Several were caught, fired, and prosecuted for theft; there was even an organized group stealing cell batteries which got several hundred thousands of dollars worth of batteries before getting caught. But it was funny seeing all the engineers walking around with proto-phones or unreleased phones (functional of course). They could pretty much smuggle anything
        they wanted out the front door.
        They never got hassled about it.

        A couple years ago, the new CellSector VP dropped the ban. They put in better inventory controls, tighter purchasing restrictions, and held lower level managers much more accountable for departmental equipment - I suspect this contributed much more to detering theft than any
        ban ever did.

        A mindless ban on something is usually a sign
        that management doesn't understand the issue.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dvovcwgn1Q, 5 Jul 2006 @ 3:52pm


    zuRdhy7EOz 3d89sPKNDar2pt c4WvLdF9Zu5

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.