Making Money Off Of Digital Cameras

from the tricky dept

Let's see. Here's an industry that had a successful business model for years, that's suddenly been thrown into turmoil by a digital alternative, that in many ways caught the industry by surprise. The Economist is taking a look at the digital photography business. While the money used to be in printing photographs, digital photography makes printing much more difficult (and often not necessary at all). Unlike their counterparts in the entertainment industry, Kodak hasn't been (as far as I know) whining to the government about forcing all digital cameras to only be printed at photoshops. Instead, they're trying to change with the times, and are experimenting with a variety of business models to capture money from digital photography.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    2Lazy2Register, 7 Jun 2002 @ 10:19am

    Kodak

    Kodak still has the benefit of lots and lots of old people, or people reluctant to change, or people that like having a negative to keep sales going for awhile. The one that's hurting has got to be Polaroid! And yes, I agree - it's surprising that they haven't found some overly broad patent they hold on 'instant photography' to try to stem the tide.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Micro Stock, 28 Nov 2007 @ 6:53pm

    Micro stock photography is also putting a hit on the industry. You can now get professional photos for less than a dollar which costed hundreds before. Micro Stock Photography has more info on this new section of the market.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.