It’s 2023 And The FCC Only Just Proposed Rules Requiring Telecoms Immediately Inform Consumers When Their Data Is Compromised

from the requiring-the-bare-minimum dept

Back in 2015, the nation’s top telecom regulator attempted to create some very basic (by international standards) privacy guidelines for telecom providers, demanding they do things like (gasp) be transparent about the consumer data they were collecting and selling, while also requiring that consumers (gasp) opt in to the sale of any particularly sensitive data.

This was too egregious an ask for the “we’re very concerned about consumer privacy violations but only if TikTok is doing it” GOP, which quickly set about using the Congressional Review Act to kill the rules before they could even take effect. That decision not only killed broadband privacy rules, it limited what the FCC can and can’t do in relation to broadband consumer privacy moving forward.

But there are still some things the FCC can do. Like this week, when the agency proposed new guidelines requiring that telecom providers be faster and more transparent about reporting on data breaches (the full FCC proposal itself is here):

The new rule would eliminate the current seven-day waiting period for carriers to notify customers of a breach and require all breaches to be reported to the FCC, FBI and U.S. Secret Service. Instead, telecoms would need to report breaches to law enforcement as soon as intrusions are discovered and immediately to consumers, as well, unless otherwise advised by authorities.

Current FCC guidance gives telecoms with more than 5,000 users seven days to report privacy breaches to consumers. Companies with less than 5,000 users have 30 days before they’re obligated to even inform consumers. The updated rules also updates the definition of “breach” to include the accidental exposure of consumer data by telecoms, and not just data compromised by a hack.

That it’s 2023 and we’re only just considering rules requiring that broadband consumers be immediately and transparently informed when their private data is compromised by a third party pretty much tells you everything you need to know about the state of U.S. privacy policymaking, and the corruption and incompetence that go hand in hand in keeping it that way.

Keep in mind the FCC’s stuck in 2-2 partisan commissioner gridlock thanks to the telecom industry’s relentless smear campaign against agency nominee Gigi Sohn. That’s made it more difficult for the agency to hold them accountable for decades of location data abuse (even post-Roe), and likely means approval of even these basic rule improvements likely won’t be finalized by vote anytime soon.

This is, as they say, why we can’t have nice things.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “It’s 2023 And The FCC Only Just Proposed Rules Requiring Telecoms Immediately Inform Consumers When Their Data Is Compromised”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
37 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

wjohnson343 (profile) says:

TechDirt is filled with a liars and corporate assholes who support Section 230

Beware of the tech lobby group that would support Section 230 and spew misinformation about online abuse:

Beware of any information published by these organizations or individuals. Think twice. These guys have an agenda, and it’s not to keep America safe from online crimes.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

wjohnson343 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Tech Dirt is full of dishonest immoral fags who support Section 230

These fags at Tech Dirt support 230 because it makes them money, they do not care about victim safety and how to help out those who have been victims of cyber crimes.

Section 230 is the most vile and immoral thing that has been passed in the USA. It is a tool for the rich to get richer while making money off of the harm caused to ordinary citizens.

Fuck Tech Dirt Fuck Section 230 Fuck Tech Entrepreneurs

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

These guys have an agenda, and it’s not to keep America safe from online crimes.

And getting rid of section 230 will make it much easier for people to run scams. Are you so against it because you cannot run your favorite scam, and all those warning about your scams feel like stalking to you?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

wjohnson343 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Europe doesn't have Section 230 and the internet has not "broke", you fuck

Europe doesn’t have Section 230 and the internet has not “broke”, so the fags at Tech Dirt are making shit up when they say the internet will break without Section 230. Nothing will happen, but victims will be more protected. Fuck the fags at Tech Dirt who make money off the victim’s suffering.

Rocky says:

Re: Re: Re:

I doubt you will understand what I’m about to tell you, but one can always hope that stupid shits like you can actually learn new things.

“Europe” doesn’t have a section 230 for several reasons like not having a first amendment, but they have other laws that fulfill the same thing. Secondly, in Europe the norm is to place the blame on the guilty party – not suing the richest 3rd party available which is the norm in the US where everyone is looking for a payday.

Fuck the fags at Tech Dirt who make money off the victim’s suffering.

You really like harassing and defaming people, don’t you? Why don’t you give us your real name and address so we can sue you for libel?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

wjohnson343 (profile) says:

Re: Re: No idiot, keeping Section 230 would allow it easy for cyberstalkers

No idiot, only by allowing Section 230 would you make it easier for cyberstalkers and harassers to ruin people’s lives. Get rid of Section 230 and platforms will remove content that violates TOS that much faster … and keep victims safe.

Your logic in favor of Section 230 is complete junk

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Get rid of section 230, and you will be protected because the ability for users to post would become rare, and large part of the existing Internet would dispensary or become one way systems. Do you really want to return to a world where the only way to publish anything was to get it accepted by a gate keeper. That is a world where most creativity will remain in desk drawers and trunks in the cellar for want of a means of getting them published.

The alternative of take does on notice would also destroy the Internet, as it would allow anybody to take down anything they disagree with, and somebody disagrees with everything.

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re:

Off topic, lying spam is spam. No need to engage with this guy.

Though I do find it hilarious that the “dirt” he has on us is that our small independent operation that struggles to stay alive and has spent years talking about how to take down big corporations, is “corporate scum” and that somehow 230 “makes us richer.”

This is just disconnected from reality nonsense. Nonsense that he wouldn’t be able to post if 230 weren’t around.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Remember. New data networks do not have any of the “tech debt” of global networks.

Domestic infrastructure redefines ecommerce, etiquette and culture in ways that a global network cannot.

Just adding that one variable makes the future look even better. Every country will have its own set of unique networks, which accelerates the creation of Internet 2.0.

Having a choice of data networks is common sense anyways.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Mike Masnick is a pathetic greedy liar says:

Re: Re: Mike Masnick is a pathetic greedy liar

Mike, you’re nothing more than a pathetic liar. It is more than well known that Section 230 harms victims of stalking, doxing, cyberharassment, swatting, and online crimes, yet you purposely spew misinformation that somehow Section 230 is a GOOD thing. It is NOT A GOOD THING, for anyone, except fat tech entrepreneurs who want to get even richer with no legal liability and who don’t want to answer to the courts for why they refuse to remove harmful content when victims often have court orders for harassment and defamation. Tech companies gamble with victim lives and take no legal responsibility, yet they make money off the revenue associated with these harmful content. You honestly don’t think your tech friends have any liability? No fucken industry on earth is free from tort liability except the stupid bloated tech industry. For years, you guys have spread lies, lobbied Congress, bribed lawmakers to not amend Section 230, to the detriment of ordinary citizens who are not protected online. Privacy invasions, cyberstalking, revenge porn, etc… are all ignored and people’s lives are ruined just because you greedy corporate pigs want to make another quick buck. People’s lives are upended like on Kiwifarms just because you greedy pigs want to make another buck at the expense of someone’s life. We see through the lobbying crap that people like Tech Dirt, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Net Choice, and so called false “professors” like Eugene Volokh, Eric Goldman are putting out there.

Note the amicus curiae brief on Gonzales v. Google – nobody supports Google! Everyone wants to see Section 230 gutted because ordinary, reasonable, sane people care about making the internet safe, NOT just maximizing greedy profits for greedy corporate assholes like you.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

The domestic part is kind of complicated, isn’t it.

This would not pertain to the US only. I can see it in several 1st world countries.

The biggest benefit is when they come together again in Internet 2.0.

Just like all good fads and hype, once one country does it, they all will. FOMO in the 21st century is serious.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

wjohnson343 (profile) says:

Everyone knows Section 230 harms the public

Looks like everyone is tired of this Section 230 trash and social media trash companies that make money by harming users and the public.

https://www.engadget.com/seattle-schools-sue-tik-tok-meta-and-other-platforms-over-youth-mental-health-crisis-090607723.html

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/01/online-harm-tech-media-regulators-wef23/

https://www.grid.news/story/technology/2023/01/09/democratic-sen-mark-warner-on-how-congress-should-deal-with-the-crypto-crash-aftermath-and-section-230/

Everyone wants Section 230 gone, except vile immoral corporate scum at Tech Dirt and other pro-tech groups who put corporate profit above public safety. Vile scum.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...