State TikTok Bans Are A Dumb Performance And Don’t Fix The Actual Underlying Problem
from the zero-calorie-performance dept
For decades, U.S. politicians leaders utterly refused to support most meaningful privacy protections for consumers. They opposed any nationwide privacy law, however straightforward. They opposed privacy rules for broadband ISPs. They also fought tooth and nail to ensure the nation’s top privacy enforcement agency, the FTC, lacked the authority, staff, funds, or resources to actually do its job.
This greed-centric apathy created a wild west data monetization industry across telecom, app makers, hardware vendors, and data brokers that sees little real accountability, in turn resulting in just an endless parade of scams, hacks, breaches, and other privacy and security violations.
Those same policymakers are now freaking out because one app and one app only, TikTok, has taken full advantage of the lax privacy and security environment these policymakers directly created.
Hyperventilating about TikTok has become one of the GOP’s policies du jour, gifting a rotating crop of performative GOP politicians (like the FCC’s Brendan Carr) repeated TV appearances.
At the same time, numerous states have announced they’ll be banning the use of TikTok on all government devices. South Dakota Governor Kristi proudly announced such a ban last week. Maryland Governor Larry Hogan joined her shortly thereafter. Georgia lawmakers are planning a similar ban.
Not to be outdone, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has announced he’s working on a similar ban. In a letter to state lawmakers, Abbott lamented the potential privacy violation TikTok represents:
“TikTok harvests vast amounts of data from its users’ devices—including when, where, and how they conduct Internet activity—and offers this trove of potentially sensitive information to the Chinese government.”
Here’s the thing these grandstanding politicians either don’t understand or are ignoring: nearly every app, service, and device in your home is hoovering up just an endless trove of information on your every waking moment, from when you wake up in the morning, to which path you took to work, then selling that poorly protected data to absolutely any nitwit (including governments) for a nickel.
In this reality, fixating exclusively on TikTok is both dumb and performative. Yeah, TikTok probably shouldn’t be on government employee phones. That said, neither should dozens if not hundreds of other apps and services repeatedly found to be over-collecting and poorly securing user data. The delusion that you’re safe simply if the app isn’t Chinese is just toddler thinking.
These policymakers have created such an unaccountable dumpster fire, you could ban TikTok today and the Chinese government could simply turn around, and in a matter of hours, buy most if not more of the same sensitive user data from a rotating crop of data brokers. Brokers who increasingly face only the lightest of occasional wrist slaps for the overcollection and oversharing of user data, something that’s become exponentially more problematic post-Dobbs.
Actually fixing this problem requires properly funding and staffing privacy regulators. It requires passing a baseline nationwide privacy law for the Internet era. It requires holding companies (and executives personally) meaningfully accountable for lax security and privacy standards.
We, of course, don’t want to actually do that, because actually caring about privacy, security, consumer empowerment, and market health would cost numerous U.S. companies billions of dollars annually. So instead we’ve embraced silly performances, such as singularly freaking out about a single app in a sea of problematic apps, devices, hardware, and services.
What’s dressed up to resemble a good faith concern about national security and privacy is really just a distraction from our longstanding failures on consumer protection, privacy/security standards, and accountability.
Again it’s your right to singularly hyperventilate about TikTok as the root of all evil, and TikTok absolutely has been caught doing sleazy things. But if you’re focusing on TikTok and TikTok only, completely oblivious as to how our repeated abandonment of privacy and accountability created the problem, you’re just flapping your arms around and making noise for the camera.
Filed Under: apps, china, data brokers, devices, ftc, georgia, maryland, privacy, security, surveillance, texas, wireless
Companies: tiktok


Comments on “State TikTok Bans Are A Dumb Performance And Don’t Fix The Actual Underlying Problem”
If I heard the news blurb on it correctly, the governor in my state of OK just issued an executive order banning tiktok from state devices and networks. Concerns about China getting the data seemed to be the point, not the general data harvesting.
Yet another example of government “Doing Something” about something important without really knowing what they are doing.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Squeaky Wheel
Everyone understands that corporations are trying to abscond with the data. However, if the data is misused, then we can hold the American ones accountable. Perhaps that still won’t stop them from misusing the it, just as laws against bank robberies haven’t stopped all stick ups. But if they get caught, and especially if they’re a big company engaging in large scale violations, then there’s a price to pay.
With toktok, noone can be held accountable. I realize the desire for blanket data protection. Barring that, the next best thing is to stop the most egregious situations.
Re: we can hold the American ones accountable
But you don’t, that’s the whole point of the article.
Re:
How many government owned devices allow the user to load their own software. If they do, that is a security hole that needs fixed, and does not involve a xenophobic attack on a company competing with US companies. These rule are performative and xenophobic, and do not address the much wider issue of privacy.
How do they get away with lying like this?
“and offers this trove of potentially sensitive information to the Chinese government”
This is simply not true! And even if it was, so what? China is a democratic country with human rights, unlike the USA. The US government spies on people and then goes after anyone threatening their power, they are the ones who can’t be trusted with people’s information.
Re:
Congrats on earning some social credit with China for that post. I can’t even call it a troll post.
Re: Re:
I feel a quote from The Animal Farm would be appropriate here.
Re: Re: Re:
How Valis is more equal than the rest of us commenters, you mean?
The difference being TikTok is effectively owned and operated by an enemy state.
It’s not like other apps. It’s interests are not merely commercial.
Also, got to point out, it routinely has been caught by Apple using exploits to collect information other apps could not.
It’s a foreign intelligence tool.
Re:
All apps and service providers are anyone’s intelligence tool.
The data TikTok can harvest is nearly laughable.
Thank you!
Dear US Gov’t… thank you for banning our product! Our global downloads have skyrocketed!!
US Gov’t… Wait, What???
Different Protocol, Different Day
In 2022, the writing is on the wall for new protocols for domestic territories.
Once one country establishes a new protocol covering networks in its soverign territory, other countries will follow suit.
When it becomes obvious that only 3rd world countries have 3rd world problems, we’ll probably see more protocols established in the 1st world. Only certain countries use obsolete protocols. They may even call it “black and white Internet”, similar to TV’s.
Protocol:
noun
the customs and regulations dealing with diplomatic formality, precedence, and etiquette.
A network protocol is an established set of rules that determine how data is transmitted between different devices in the same network.
The innovation is already available to turn the page on the next generation of information superhighways.
Typo
Last name is missing – Kristi Noem.
If only they cared about lead service lines, the homeless, vets, poverty, hunger, pastors raping kids, christofascist terrorism, (rattles off 100 more horrible things they ignore) as much as they care about what they imagine a fscking video sharing app MIGHT manage to do that will undermine the entire nation way more than people drinking polluted tap water & dying would.
'We spent good money to get this data, how dare you not buy it?!'
Maybe they’re just annoyed that china doesn’t have to pay a US company to get all that data and are trying to undercut the competition to force them to cough up the cash for it?
I mean it’s either that or hypocritical blatant pandering to bigots who are losing their mind because it’s a foreign company spying on users rather than a local one doing it, but I’m sure that couldn’t be it…