Twitter Blue’s New Verification / Not Verification Scheme Widely Abused On Day One
from the will-the-real-elon-musk-please-bluecheck dept
Look, when it was revealed that Elon Musk’s first big plan was to make blue checks available for purchase for $8 a month, some of us quickly pointed out that the blue checks weren’t supposed to be about status, but about verification that someone is who they say they are. And, that’s kind of important. It came about because celebrities felt uncomfortable using the site while there were tons of impersonators, and advertisers were less interested in advertising next to questionable content.
But… Musk is gonna Musk, and the plan rolled out on Wednesday, along with the rapidly changing gray check system that sorta, but not really replaces some of the blue check system while the blue checks become available for everyone (don’t worry, you don’t need to follow).
Anyway, tons of people, both experts and those with just basic common sense, pointed out that opening up the blue checks to anyone with $8 to burn was going to lead to abuse, impersonation, and scams. Musk and his reliable group of yes men, however, insisted that it would somehow… get rid of all that? He keeps trying to argue that since such accounts will get shut down, it won’t be worth it to people. But $8 is not much to pay for someone looking to do something nefarious (or funny). And it sure looks like Twitter isn’t set up to make sure that these aren’t being abused.
Yesterday, we highlighted one account that was pretending to be Twitter and pushing some sort of crypto scam:
And, on Wednesday, tons of people started impersonating famous people and famous brands. Just for the hell of it. The funniest one I saw was a fake Rudy Giuliani (the account was actually over a year old, but only just got the blue check).
Others impersonated Elon himself:
A fake Lebron James requested a trade from the Lakers and got a bunch of attention before it was deleted:
Note that all of those show the “verified” blue badge that used to denote that they were real.
Meanwhile, a ton of companies (i.e., potential advertisers) were also spoofed, and not always in a flattering light:
Now, at this point, most of these are kind of amusing. And all of the examples above have been shut down. Musk and his fans are joking about how they got $8 from all these guys and they lost their accounts, but the people who created them don’t much care about that. They were making a point.
And the point remains: advertisers are going to feel pretty uncomfortable about coming back to a platform that can’t protect their brands and is open to such things.
Even worse, is that while people are quickly spotting these jokes, you’d have to be crazy to assume that others aren’t using the blue checks for something more nefarious and a lot less public. It’s quite likely that scammers are quickly setting up blue check accounts, and it wouldn’t surprise me if mischief makers associated with nation states are doing the same.
This is the kind of thing that a good manager at least has folks exploring how to prevent, rather than launching it and just hoping you’ll fix it later. People are going to get scammed. That’s not good for Twitter, and it’s certainly not good for any company that wanted to do business with Twitter.
Filed Under: blue checks, elon musk, impersonation, security, verification
Companies: twitter
Comments on “Twitter Blue’s New Verification / Not Verification Scheme Widely Abused On Day One”
What was probably going through Musk’s mind making this decision
Elon Musk: And when I grow old I will make a website where everyone gets to pay to be verified. Everyone will be verified! And when everyone gets verified… (snickers) no one will be.
Re:
found out …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCsfHVM5x_I&t=50s
(yep… the HHGTTG Fail Whale)
Re:
Piss off legit businesses/public figures so he’s forced to make all twitter users submit I.D to verify? That’s the path this shitshow is going.
Now, at this point, most of these are kind of amusing. And all of the examples above have been shut down. Musk and his fans are joking about how they got $8 from all these guys and they lost their accounts, but the people who created them don’t much care about that. They were making a point.
Going to be a lot of chargebacks for people who didn’t get the full month of service for their $8.
I can almost hear it...
🎵 Burn, baby, burn — Twitter Inferno! Burn, baby, burn… 🎵
Nintendo
I can actually believe the Nintendo one. At least that’s what they think us us in private.
Re:
Yeah that’s just saying the quiet part out loud so I could totally see that being from an actual employee/exec of the company, using the system for a little plausible deniability.
Re:
I’ve always thought of Nintendo as a stripper. They have something you want and pretend to like you for money, but ultimately, it’s a very mercenary transaction.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Wow this place is just dirt
So pray tell about the 12 to 15 thousands dollar side show .. if it’s about verification and not status ? oh no comment oh this comment never get’s posted ic …The fact that many many conservatives figures who were in no way breaking any twitter laws.. couldn’t get blue marked and that many others had to pay thousands of dollars to get it … shows you just full of ..
Re:
Hello sir, madame, other,
Sorry you appear to be confused. The address for Twitter support is https://help.twitter.com/en/forms
Current wait time is several tens of years.
We hope this has resolved your issue to our satisfaction
Techdirt’s (un)helpful support team
Re:
I bet dollars to doughnuts these ‘important conservative figures’ who couldn’t get verified were youtube or podcast Qanon effluencers or shady militia types, and followed up their claims of needing thousands of dollars to get verified with links to their givesendgo page.
Being loud doesn’t make you notable enough to need a verified account, it certainly doesn’t make you important, and not getting the validation you seek is not the same as censorship.
Re:
Ye, wtf you doing on Techdirt?
Re:
[citation needed] for the implied assertion that this was the case for conservatives, specifically.
Just rebrand it
Might be easiest to just rebrand from ‘Verified Account’ to ‘Un-verified Verified Account’
Re:
Verified Unverifiable? 🤣
At least its not virtue signaling with inepts. Now with new and improved “Authentic Illiteracy” (AI 2.0)
Free Service Paid Service
Chastity Lust
Temperance Glutton
Charity Greed
Diligence Sloth
Kindness Envy
Patience Wrath
Humility Pride
The middle finger has two pricing levels now too. “Please insert $8 for additional time” sounds all too familiar.
Much like a needed 3rd and 4th party in other word soup venues to square up equilibrium, Elon seems to have found his funk sway pretty quickly
The best part?
The best part (aside from the self-destruction of Twitter) is that, while everyone on Twitter is talking about this ongoing dumpster fire, it’s not trending.
Clearly Chief Twit is choosing what gets considered “News” on his platform.
Re:
Like I’ve been saying for years when the right wing idiots here bleat about censorship, they don’t want free speech, they want to be in charge of taking away the free speech of others. This has never been about anything other than control.
https://mastodon.social/@taylorlorenz/109321648749231068
if you can’t open it, it says
with the caption from @EliLillyandCo (NOT THE OFFICIAL ELI LILLY TWITTER)
Gasp, you mean to say that when you turn a personal verification system into one where you just need to pay to be marked as verified people will use it for nefarious and/or hilarious means?! Who ever could have seen that coming?
On sec, I’ve just been handed a note, apparently the answer is ‘everyone but Musk’.
New Techdirt Features Announcement
Just want to give everyone a heads up, Techdirt will soon be introducing an ‘Official Techdirt Icon’ on those commenters that obtain funniest / most insightful comment of the week more than 2 times in a calendar year (icon can also be bought for $8 / month via my patreon)
Re:
you forgot the shaddy looking link.
Re: 2 per year, ya say...
O.K., that’s one.
We’re waiting with bated breath for the second (grin)
Re: 2 Per year, ya say...
OK “Masnick” (if that’s your real name),
We’ll call that ‘one’ and give you a chance to be funny this year.
Better hurry, it’s already November!
diogenes
Gotta wonder how much its costing Twitter to have someone review all these accounts and cancel the phony ones. Are they gaining or losing on that $8?
Re:
If they’re just handing them out to anyone that pays I suspect that they’re only bothering to review the ones that garner enough attention/reports.
Very fried accounts
I’ll have you know that my cousin Enron Musk is simply testing a new rocket engine. Have you SEEN what $44 Billion looks like when it goes supernova?
While it was mostly bad, it had it’s upsides, like the impersonation which led to a debate around the price of insulin.
https://twitter.com/theofficialword/status/1590754512150888449 What do you think of this one? Starring “Ben Shapiro” and “Ted Cruz”.
You do have to hand it to Elon. He’s really doubling down on the whole “move fast and break things” mantra…
So...
Do the “White Lives Matter” marchers at Independence Day parade in Warsaw have verified Twitter accounts now because of this?
Predictable.
Re:
LibofTikTok is now “verified”: https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok
🤮
okay I know Elon's business model...
Elon should move to his own private island and declare Twitter a sovereign nation to get rid of party poopers like the FTC and libel attorneys.
Then forget advertisers entirely and start taking $8/month from anyone who wants to just faff around with parody accounts. Or scams, but at that point, if you actually fall for anything on Twitter, it’s on you for sheer stupidity.
The only thing I’ve ever found on Twitter to be of any use are parody accounts. Kylo Ren, come back, we miss you!
Occasionally the parody accounts might actually make a valid point (free insulin).
As I said in another comment thread: trying to have a social media website be the end-all for verification on someone’s identity is a huge disaster, and it always has been. Verification didn’t work even before Musk took over, and it routinely got it wrong and rejected the right people while verifying scammers. So adding the ability to get it by just paying 8 bucks a month was an even dumber decision.
Ideally an actual company versed in dealing with people’s identity should have been given the money, and it should have been an up-front charge to simply have them tell twitter if they were/were not who they said they were, and that should have been the end of it. If they want a subscription, then make a new service besides verification like a Twitter+.
“Now, at this point, most of these are kind of amusing. And all of the examples above have been shut down. Musk and his fans are joking about how they got $8 from all these guys and they lost their accounts, but the people who created them don’t much care about that. They were making a point.”
I will say: This is missing the point as much as Elon. They were doing it because it’s funny, not because anybody was trying to make any kind of ‘point’. We do a little trolling even if it costs $8. (a steal compared to some forms of trolling)
Re:
Can you prove they weren’t doing it for both reasons?
I’m still perplexed how and why he thought this was supposed to work; it’s like he knows nothing about scam artists or human nature.
Re:
He was protected from the consequences of fucking up by his generational wealth. Of course he doesn’t know shit about human nature.
Re:
I mean he gave them a week to roll the system out or get canned, I don’t imagine he put much thought into it beyond ‘make someone else do it and then blame them if it goes wrong since it’s never my fault.’