Finally, Some Good News: Federal Anti-SLAPP Law Introduced

from the free-speech-ftw dept

It’s been seven years since Congress last introduced a federal anti-SLAPP law (and that was six years after the previous attempt). So here we are, and once again we’ve finally got a federal anti-SLAPP law introduced in Congress, this time by Rep. Jamie Raskin, who recently held a hearing focusing on SLAPP lawsuit attacks against environmental activists (which is where many SLAPP cases have been filed, though the issue is much broader than that).

Again, if you’re unfamiliar, the rich and powerful often will file obviously bogus lawsuits against those who criticize them, knowing that even if they’re going to lose, the time, cost, and stress of a lawsuit is still really damaging (and in many cases, leads those criticizing the rich and powerful to back down and shut up). These are called SLAPP lawsuits, for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation.

Some states (a little more than half right now) have anti-SLAPP laws that aim to protect speakers who are victims of such SLAPP suits. The fundamental way in which anti-SLAPP laws work are that they allow the defendant to argue that the case is a SLAPP, which halts the process for expensive things like discovery, and requires that the plaintiff show some proof that the case is actually legitimate. If they can’t do that, the case is dismissed, and frequently the plaintiff has to pay the defendant’s legal fees.

That is, while it can still be stressful and time consuming, it hopefully gets kicked out of court much more quickly, and can end up costing the plaintiff more money in that they have to cover the legal fees of the person they filed the bogus lawsuit against.

Unfortunately, many states don’t even have anti-SLAPP laws, and even among those that do, it’s a really mixed bag of quality. We’ve seen more and more states start passing such laws, but it’s slow going. Also, there is no federal anti-SLAPP law, and many federal courts have (questionably) decided that state anti-SLAPP laws don’t apply in federal court (there’s a long, boring, procedural argument for why that is, which I think is incorrect). But still, having a strong federal anti-SLAPP law set the floor that can apply across all states and in federal court would be a huge win for free speech.

So special thanks to Rep. Raskin for introducing it.

Raskin’s bill is not perfect โ€” it’s not quite how I’d draft a federal anti-SLAPP law, and I worry a bit that the language of what it covers may limit it and cut out too many SLAPP suits, but on the whole it’s a huge step forward and has many good features. And, this is a case where getting something in place like this is way better than the lack of any protection in place now. If you want a good analysis of where the bill differs from state anti-SLAPP laws, you can read this analysis from EarthRights, who supports the bill.

Key differences include a more limited definition of what cases the bill can be applied to (specifically, the definition of what is “a matter of public concern”), making the fee shifting to be rebuttable rather than mandatory (so plaintiffs can argue why they shouldn’t have to pay defendants’ legal bills) and more efforts to not scare off plaintiffs (kinda required otherwise plaintiff trial lawyers would throw a shitfit). I understand why all of these are included, though I worry about the impact of each. But, on the whole, it’s a good bill, and it’s way better than what we have now (i.e., nothing but a hope and a prayer that Twiqbal and a tidy 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss gets you effectively the same thing โ€” which it does not).

Unfortunately I fear that, like earlier anti-SLAPP bills, this one won’t get very far. That seems to be the way these days. Protecting free speech is boring. Attacking it is the new hotness. But, giving up shouldn’t be an option. Having this bill introduced is a good first step โ€” and it would be great to build some momentum in support of it.

This is good news. At a time when we could really use good news.

Thank you, Rep. Raskin.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Finally, Some Good News: Federal Anti-SLAPP Law Introduced”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
9 Comments

Leave a Reply to Ehud Gavron Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop ยป

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
10:43 California Governor Signs Bill Forbidding The Use Of Rap Lyrics As Criminal Evidence (12)
10:45 The Onion Files Hilarious Amicus Brief In An Important Case, And Actually Makes A Key Point In The Best Way Possible (23)
09:31 There Are Real Threats To Free Speech Everywhere. Cancel Culture Is Far Down The List (338)
10:44 Germany's Government Continues To Lock People Up For Being Extremely Online (18)
09:35 Saudi Prosecutors Are Targeting A US Citizen For Tweets Criticizing The Government (18)
13:36 Finally, Some Good News: Federal Anti-SLAPP Law Introduced (9)
16:43 5th Circuit Rewrites A Century Of 1st Amendment Law To Argue Internet Companies Have No Right To Moderate (625)
12:03 Court To Public University: Yeah, It's A 1st Amendment Problem When You Delete Comments You Don't Like (16)
10:46 Judge Blocks 'No Recording Cops Within 8 Feet' Law Even Arizona Cops Don't Want To Defend (6)
09:31 Virginia Court Rejects Prior Restraint, Says Old Law Used In Attempt To Ban Books Is Unconstitutional (18)
12:20 Censorship Starts At Home: Turkish Gov't Controls The Press, Repeatedly Claims It Does Not Control The Press (6)
05:35 Wannabe Censor Ron DeSantis Is Now 0 For 2 With His Censorship Bills: Court Throws Out His 'Stop WOKE Act' As Unconstitutional (34)
09:38 Elon Musk's Legal Filings Against Twitter Show How Little He Actually Cares About Free Speech (35)
12:07 Virginia Politicians Are Suing Books They Don't Like (65)
09:21 Appeals Court Corrects Its Previous Error, Holds That Recording Cops Is A Clearly Established Right (8)
15:27 Federal Court Allows Protesters' First Amendment Suit Against Violent Boston Cops To Continue (26)
19:39 Student Expelled Over Off-Campus Nazi Joke Can Continue To Sue The School, Says Appeals Court (205)
10:42 Twitter Sues Indian Government Over Orders To Block Content (3)
10:47 Policymakers Need To Realize How Any Internet Regulation Will Impact Speech (135)
10:44 More Than Two Thirds Of States Are Pushing Highly Controversial (And Likely Unconstitutional) Bills To Moderate Speech Online (50)
13:38 Australia's Upside Down Internet Liability Policy Shows How Section 230 Enables More Free Speech (87)
09:28 The Moral Panic Is Spreading: Think Tank Proposes Banning Teens From Social Media; Texas Rep Promises To Intro Bill (88)
12:15 Federal Agent Stupidly Threatens Twitter User With Arrest Over Protected First Amendment Expression (57)
09:31 How The Dobbs Decision Will Lead To Attacks On Free Speech; Or, Why Democrats Need To Stop Undermining Free Speech (52)
10:46 Devin Nunes Loses Yet Another SLAPP Suit, This Time In California (21)
09:28 Philippines Orders Critical News Organization, Rappler, Shut Down; Just As Rappler's Founder Argues Against Free Speech (11)
09:19 Clarence Thomas REALLY Wants To Make It Easier For The Powerful To Sue People For Criticizing Them (32)
15:39 Twitter Successfully Quashes Sketchy Copyright Subpoena Over Billionaire's Critic On Twitter (237)
12:14 Giant Private Prison Company Goes To Court To Try To Get Lawyer To Stop Tweeting About Them (15)
10:48 UK Approves Extradition Of Julian Assange, Allowing The US Government To Continue Criminalizing Journalism (46)
More arrow