Data Brokers Selling Location Data Of Americans Who Visit Abortion Clinics
from the watching-you-watching-me dept
With the leaked Supreme Court ruling indicating the court is poised to effectively overturn Roe V. Wade, you can expect a new wave of worry about the weaponization and abuse of consumer location data, as states increasingly seek to criminalize abortion — and those aiding others seeking such services.
As if on cue: Motherboard’s latest scoop indicates that data brokers have been busily collecting and selling the location data of users who visit Planned Parenthood abortion clinics, including “aggregated” data on how long visitors were at the clinic and which census block(s) they traveled from:
The company selling the data is SafeGraph. SafeGraph ultimately obtains location data from ordinary apps installed on peoples’ phones. Often app developers install code, called software development kits (SDKs), into their apps that sends users’ location data to companies in exchange for the developer receiving payment. Sometimes app users don’t know that their phone—be that via a prayer app, or a weather app—is collecting and sending location data to third parties, let alone some of the more dangerous use cases that Motherboard has reported on, including transferring data to U.S. military contractors.
Safegraph works with all manner of organizations and companies interested in tracking user movements in significant detail, including, it was also revealed this week, the CDC. Motherboard didn’t find it particularly difficult to purchase its own data trove, including recent visitors to Planned Parenthood, for $160:
SafeGraph classifies “Planned Parenthood” as a “brand” that can be tracked, and the data Motherboard purchased includes more than 600 Planned Parenthood locations in the United States. The data included a week’s worth of location data for those locations in mid-April. SafeGraph calls the location data product “Patterns.” In total, the data cost just over $160. Not all Planned Parenthood locations offer abortion services. But Motherboard verified that some facilities included in the purchased dataset do.
Again, this data can be helpful to everybody from epidemiologists to city planners. But it’s also so incredibly lucrative, we haven’t implemented much in the way of any standards as to how it can be used (as to not stifle innovation, wink wink). As a result, it’s routinely collected without user knowledge or consent, sold without much in the way of safeguards, and distributed widely across countless industries.
As we’ve noted repeatedly, telecom, tech, app, and adtech companies all really enjoy claiming this kind of granular data collection and sale is no big deal because the data being collected is “anonymized.” But studies have repeatedly made it clear that “anonymization” is a meaningless term, since users can be easily identified with just a few additional datasets.
The same was true here, with the privacy impact of aggregation and anonymization being overstated:
SafeGraph’s data is aggregated, meaning it isn’t explicitly specifying where a certain device moved to. Instead, it focuses on the movements of groups of devices. But researchers have repeatedly warned about the possibilities of unmasking individuals contained in allegedly anonymized datasets.
Sections of the SafeGraph dataset Motherboard purchased handle a very small number of devices per record, theoretically making deanonymization of those people easier. Some had just four or five devices visiting that location, with SafeGraph filtering the data by whether the person used an Android or an iOS device as well.
Safegraph didn’t want to respond to a request for comment.
Journalists have been documenting this specific threat to the safety of those seeking abortions for several years. Broader concerns about the harm of location data over-collection and sale aren’t theoretical. There’s been a parade of scandals by a wide variety of companies and services showcasing how the rampant over-collection and sale of location data causes immeasurable harm.
Scandals at Securus, LocationSmart, T-Mobile, Grindr, and others have all brutally illustrated how cellular carriers, app makers, tech companies, and location data brokers routinely collect, buy and sell your daily movement records with only a fleeting effort to ensure all of the subsequent buyers and sellers of that data adhere to basic privacy and security standards. That data is then abused by stalkers, criminals, law enforcement, and anybody with a few nickels to rub together.
While there’s often a lot of pretense to the contrary, U.S. lawmakers didn’t do anything meaningful to tackle this problem not because it’s difficult, but because a long list of industries and companies found the broken and dangerous status quo to be more profitable. And because those companies collectively lobbied a corrupt Congress into a state of perpetual dysfunction and apathy.
The check for that apathy continues to come due. And the idea that this location data won’t be abused by a surging U.S. authoritarian movement seeking to criminalize, vilify, and harass not just those seeking abortion — but those helping and caring for them — seems relatively naïve.
Filed Under: abortion, adtech, apps, consumers, location data, planned parenthood, privacy, smartphonw, surveillance, telecom, wireless
Companies: safegraph
Comments on “Data Brokers Selling Location Data Of Americans Who Visit Abortion Clinics”
What could go wrong?
Selling that data in particular would be problematic without Roe v Wade being thrown in the garbage, afterwards that sort of ‘product’ strikes me as one that will have a slew of crimes resulting from it as the ‘anonymized’ data is shown to be anything but.
Re:
Now when you say “crimes”, do you mean abortion clinic bombings, assassinations of doctors who perform abortions of any kind, or both?
(People these days tend to forget that yes, violence against abortion providers was a regular thing not too terribly long ago. Roe v. Wade being undone will bring those days back…in the states where reproductive rights will still be protected by law, that is.)
Re: Re:
All them good Christian folk helping murderers hide from justice because their religious law was more important than the laws of man.
Something something render onto Caesar…
And as the talking points call women who have abortions as murderers some will feel totally okay with executing them, and if someone can get a list of people who spent more than 5 min at a planned parenthood (or was within a close enough distance to end up lumped into the data) will be designated as targets for those open minded love one another people who have no problem using terror to enforce Evangelical Sharia.
Re: Re: Re: But Unintended consequences...
Which in this case will arise because certain anti-abortion protestors spend a lot of time right in front of abortion clinics.
There’s also the question of what happens when anti-abortion leaders get exposed having abortions themselves. I suspect that gay marriage got legal partially because certain anti-gay folks had trouble getting themselves arrested for soliciting gay sex in airport bathrooms; wonder if this will apply here?
Re: Re: Re:2
But they can mix and match that with the people using the pray the gays away app data to remove their people from the list.
Re: Re: Re:2
There’s also the question of what happens when anti-abortion leaders get exposed having abortions themselves
Oh that’s easy, ‘I had a moment of weakness, I pray that you all can forgive me’ and that’ll be the end of it as they go back to harassing women.
Re: Re: Re:3
I mean they forgive adultery, feeding your mistress an abortion smoothie, wife beating, drunk driving, and a multitude of other “unforgivable” sins… because it would be wrong to judge others (that share my deeply held religious beliefs where we can just be forgiven).
Re: Re:
Yes and more, of that I have no doubt.
The company selling the data is SafeGraph. SafeGraph ultimately obtains location data from ordinary apps installed on peoples’ phones. Often app developers install code, called software development kits (SDKs), into their apps that sends users’ location data to companies in exchange for the developer receiving payment. Sometimes app users don’t know that their phone—be that via a prayer app, or a weather app—is collecting and sending location data to third parties, let alone some of the more dangerous use cases that Motherboard has reported on, including transferring data to U.S. military contractors.
I’ve been worried about this possibility for the longest time. That’s why I sideload apps from a trustworthy website rather than from Google Play and never install any app asking for billing permission without justification (games apps) or exact location permission. As the (smartphone age) saying goes, “Just because I’m paranoid, doesn’t mean they’re not out to collect all my data!”
A cell phone, smart or otherwise, that is on should be thought of as a Personalized Tracking Device(PTD). Same for connected cars, TVs or cable boxes connected to the Internet, those connected workout devices, etc. Anytime you use a PTD, expect that you have little to no effective privacy while doing so. There is almost always language in those ‘Privacy Policy’ statements that allow the data to be collected, aggregated, processed and sold for profit.
As many studies have shown, anonymized data isn’t, especially when combined with other data sets.
I would be surprised if there are not similar data brokers selling the location data of folks visiting places where guns and ammunition are sold. Or dancers gyrate mostly naked. And you just thought your visit to the 12 step place was anonymous.
Re:
Just because you live in a country where there is no data protection legislation in effect, doesn’t mean that your situation applies to everyone else in the world. Quite the opposite.
Re: Re:
The problem is that it’s too easy for these bandits to contract out of these provisions. Just slip one stray line into the incomprehensible multipage terms and conditions and bye-bye privacy.
Re: Re: Re:
The rights enshrined in the legislation can’t actually be ‘contracted out of’, just like the Fair Dealing exceptions to the CDPA 1988 can’t. If they could, then companies wouldn’t have to employ other tricks such as having only one option when it comes to cookies (very few websites use only essential cookies) or forcing educational users of copyrighted material to access it through the analogue hole by embedding Digital Rights Malware onto media.
Surely that would also scoop up the movemnets of pro-life protesters as well?
Re:
So what? There is no law against being pro-life.
As opposed to the adverse in Texas which has set up bounties and indemnification for private actors who sue women seeking an abortion and people aiding them.
This kind of commercially available data trove is a treasure chest for systematized bounty hunting outsourced to private enterprises by the state (probably even cheaper that way than having to hire one’s own personnel and competence).
It’s sort of the reverse of money laundering: unconstitutional business is laundered by the states by committing it using money as a proxy.
And every entity willing to drop the pretense of a conscience in return for money is on board.
Re: Re:
It’s a special sort of sickening system, too—because it means a woman made pregnant by rape and the doctor who aborts that fetus could be sued by her rapist (and members of his family) under that system. Anyone who doesn’t see anything wrong with that can go fuck themselves.
Re: Re: Re:
Corpses have more rights.
Abortion
Denying women the right to abortion means women have less bodily autonomy than a corpse.
Here’s the thing, people.
It doesn’t matter when life begins.
It doesn’t matter whether a fetus is a human being or not.
It doesn’t matter whether we’re talking about a fertilized egg, or a fetus, or a baby, or a five year old, or a Nobel Prize winning pediatric oncologist.
That entire argument about what is or is not technically alive is a deliberately distracting, subjective, and unwinnable argument that could not matter less.
You cannot be forced to donate blood, or marrow, or organs, even though thousands die every year, on waiting lists.
Your organs cannot be harvested after your death without your explicit, written, pre-mortem permission.
NOBODY has the right to use your body, against your will, even to save their life, or the life of another person. Even if you have already died.
Denying women the right to abortion means women have less bodily autonomy than a corpse.
That’s it.
That’s the argument.
Re: Re: Re:2
You cannot be forced to donate blood, or marrow, or organs, even though thousands die every year, on waiting lists.
Your organs cannot be harvested after your death without your explicit, written, pre-mortem permission.
If it wasn’t such a dangerous bluff I’d say it would be interesting for a politician to propose a bill that mandated blood and organ donation, just to see how committed to ‘life’ the pro-birthers are when it’s their bodies on the line.
Then again I suppose the response to the idea of mandatory vaccination in the middle of a pandemic rather answered that question already.
Re: Re: Re:3
They would sudden develop deeply held religious beliefs, which is how they manage to dodge everything they want to inflict upon others.
They would then setup clinics to talk people into donation by showing them horrific pictures of people suffering and demand that since they are run by those with deeply held religious beliefs they can’t be forced to assist those they feel are objectionable.
They would then push for laws to allow prisoners to “donate” organs to get time off of their sentences because the life that is saved could be the next Einstein (ignore the fact that they would then throw that person in jail for hearsay that the universe is really old and we didn’t live with dinosaurs).
Then since there is no privacy from the government you’ll see blood types & other information ending up in databases accessed by police who magically keep pulling over & having altercations with people who happen to be perfect matches to people who buy many police ball tickets.
Parents of still born children (or those with defects that end their short lives soon after birth) will have to stand aside helplessly as their child is harvested to keep someone else’s baby alive but it will all be part of gods plan and you shouldn’t be sad that we parted your baby out against your wishes.
On the upside they might finally vote for universal healthcare, but only to make sure every citizen has their blood & tissue types on file & we’ll totally NEVER see them pushing that addicts or “lesser” people only have value in keeping the god fearing alive.
I think I just threw up in my mouth.
Tell me this could never happen, I’ll just point at the 250,000 people who needlessly died in the pandemic to preserve deeply held beliefs of people who hadn’t been to a church in 20 years.
Re: Re: Re:4
[W]e didn’t live with dinosaurs…
Dibsney begs to differ.
Re: Re: Re:4
Ahh, but we do, birds are therapod dinosaur clade, same clade ad t-rex.
Re: Re: Re:3
It’s also sort of appalling how those fighting for the unborn life which is mostly at danger in strained circumstances more often than not are the same people who fight against the evil socialist tendencies to help people in strained circumstances at the cost of those who can well afford it.
It’s sort of embarrassing that the countries with the lowest abortion rates tend to be those where abortion is easiest. Mostly because their focus on the value and worth of life is not as myopically constrained, there is sane sex education (and birth control), and an economic perspective for children that does not essentially rely on bankrupting the parent.
There is no need to force women at gunpoint to bear children.
Re: Re: Re:4
Well, not unless one political party is controlled by a group of radical Christian authoritarians who believe in the ridiculous “Great Replacement” conspiracy theory and want as many new (white) babies as they deem necessary to stave off the “replacement”.
But surely that isn’t the case~.
Re: Re: Re:4
It’s also sort of appalling how those fighting for the unborn life which is mostly at danger in strained circumstances more often than not are the same people who fight against the evil socialist tendencies to help people in strained circumstances at the cost of those who can well afford it.
Which is why I refer to them as pro-birth rather than pro-life as for all the cries about the ‘sanctity of life’ before birth afterwards all that concern seems to just up and disappear.
Re: Re: Re:3
They already do that in Singapore.
And the Pro-birth Kochtards are for it.
Re: Re:
If you think the only consequences resulting from this kind of location tracking and selling will fall within the restrictions of the law, that shows a serious failure of imagination.
Re:
Come back to me when the entire Republican Party, including Trump the Traitor, and more importantly, THEIR PAYMASTERS (Koch Industries, News Corp, Putin, just to name a few), are arrested and put behind bars for Jan 6.
Or better yet, shot.
Insert gif of man who blinks and slightly turns his head
Re:
Well I don’t see what you are worrying about, its not like its tracking people, just things with almost no ability to make proper decisions designed to make babies. /s
I hate this timeline, can we reboot?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Next Step
The next step will be for the republicans to pass the Reproduction Decency Act with its Section 230.
Section 230 of the reproduction decency act will grant a qualified immunity to anyone who impleads access to an abolition clinic.
This use of immunity to encourage private actors to violate the rights of others will of course be considered perfectly legal by Mike and Mike’s Misfits because they are always perfectly consistent.
Re:
You are the one who thinks compelling others to do what you want is the right thing to do. Mike opposes people who would compel others to do or behave as they wish.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Mike is a Sociopath
Mike is a sociopath who believes that rules that apply to others should not apply to him.
Social media wouldn’t do ‘as they wish’ just as anyone else cant do ‘as they wish’ because they would be sued.
BigTech is only able to do ‘as they wish’ because they enjoy a unique federal immunity that the rest of us do not.
Re: Re: Re:
[Hallucinates facts contrary to any and all real-world evidence]
Re: Re: Re:
This from Crybaby Chorizo?
Do you have anything to offer other than impotent threats and basic bitch projection?
Re: Re: Re:2
Never has.
Re: Re: Re:
Fuck you and everything you stand for.
I hope your Russian handlers are proud of you.
Re:
You’re broken. Try again.
Re:
When your comments include nonsensical neologisms such as ‘impleads’, it makes your arguments fall flat. That and the lack of substance behind them.
Re:
I bet you’re the kind of person who thinks a woman made pregnant by rape should have to consult her rapist before getting an abortion.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Wow
Wow what a reaction for even suggesting that the state should use immunity to encourage private action against the rights of others.
Don’t you think this intense visceral reaction should make you stop and think?
Re: Re: Re:
Nope. Have fun supporting rapists’ parental rights, you stupid son of a bitch! 🙃
Re: Re: Re:2
They’ve been wrapping themselves in the thought that ‘god meant for it to happen’.
They are so worked up over satan leading men astray but only god can make a man violently assault a women and impregnate her against her will.
On the upside child marriage is still legal in many states so if the 30 yr old knocks up a 13 yr old, he’ll have to marry her and raise the baby… because obviously he is no threat and god meant for the wife & baby to spend the rest of their lives as living fleshjacks for the bastard.
Re: Re: Re:3
Ah, but there’s the kicker: Child marriage may be legal in those states, but unless child rape is also legal…well, that child’s pregnancy could also be called “evidence”.
Re: Re: Re:4
A wife can not be forced to testify against her husband.
And the parents might give permission for it to happen.
Its a screwed up sort of country.
Re: Re: Re:5
That’s why some cases of child rape fall under the category of “statutory rape”.
Re: Re: Re:5
A wife cannot be forced to testify against her husband.
She wouldn’t have whether or not she was married to him. The presence of the pregnancy and the gestational age of the foetus together constitute physical evidence.
Re: Re: Re:6
They watched as the men murdered Emmett Till then sat on a jury & didn’t convict.
The Army recently made reparations to an Italian lady because as the war was ending some soldiers ate her birthday cake, but the talk of any other reparations for our past sins are a non-starter.
Re: Re: Re:7
Not only was Emmett Till black, there weren’t video cameras and YouTube back then.
Re: Re: Re:8
We’ve watched videos of people being harmed/maimed/killed and those doing it getting off even with full color video.
Re: Re: Re:9
I’ve seen more occasions where those videos were used in evidence against the participants.
Re: Re: Re:3
It’s worse than that — if the raped women ends up pregnant, that proves that actually, she consented (she might not admit it, not even to herself, but the body doesn’t lie).
That’s a doctrine that goes back centuries, but these days they’re claiming it’s a scientific fact that in cases of “legitimate rape” and versus impregnation, “the body has ways of shutting that down”.
America is heading down the –road– highway to a Gilead far too much like the one portrayed by Atwood in A Handmaid’s Tale
Re: Re: Re:4
The body is hardwired on a pretty low level to react to crude kinds of stimulus. We are close descendants from apes where tribes with an Alpha male and a culture of infanticide and rape is not unheard of, and the body reacts to preserve its offspring and integrity.
Meaning that in a rape situation, your bodily reaction and emotion may contradict your mind, words, and wishes. Can you imagine what a kind of betrayal and guilt that can mean on top of being a rape victim?
Being not just a victim of an attacker but of your own body committing treason and calling you a liar? That amplifies the horror and violation, adding to the numbers of women who’d rather be silent about what happened to them rather than having their psyche ripped apart before the court all over.
Re: Re: Re:5
Oh but if there was an orgasm, you must have enjoyed it and it wasn’t rape.
Are you sure you didn’t just have 2nd thoughts?
Why did you get that drunk?
Were you dressed slutty?
Why would you walk in that area dressed like that?
Click it because I can’t keep tabbing to type it out.
https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1432476
Re: Re: Re:6
Well, I was more thinking of involuntary anticipatory reactions. You know, like when in court for force-feeding a hamburger to a vegetarian, considering it a valid defense if there has been salivation. They wanted it. And after all, the body can throw up if it really does not want some food.
Re: Re: Re:7
Its pretty horrific.
Its also part of the reason many men don’t report being raped because people believe if there was an erection they wanted it, not understanding how the human body works.
Then the added shame of thinking deep down they did enjoy it because explaining that a breeze can give a man an erection without any sexual desire isn’t something taught to boys.
Re: Re: Re:4
To be fair, AFAIK “they” didn’t claim that, just one remarkably stupid person named Todd Akin.
Re: Re: Re:5
Oh honey, there is plenty of stupid to go around.
https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1586904-mildly-infuriating
Re: Re: Re:6
I didn’t say only one of them is stupid. I said only one of them said “if it’s a legitimate rape, the body has ways of shutting that down.” Honey.
Re: Re: Re:7
No, he’s just the only recent politician to be reported expressing that alt-fact in exactly those words.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2 Dense as Granite
I’m not surprised it goes right over your head.
Re: Re: Re:3
Every accusation a confession.
Re: Re: Re:
“Don’t you think this intense visceral reaction should make you stop and think?”
You are this close to getting it.
Re:
This use of immunity to encourage private actors to violate the rights of others will of course be considered perfectly legal by Mike and Mike’s Misfits because they are always perfectly consistent.
Do you seriously think that private actors are going to have any success by turning people in?
They won’t be able to sue anonymously, after all.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Still Not Getting the Point
Still not getting the point.
Re: Re: Re:
Every accusation a confession.
Re: Re: Re:
What I’m saying is offloading enforcement to civilians will end up with civilians being exposed to whatever negative feedback activists decide to pursue.
The same is true for any type of enforcement.
Now, do you get the point?
Re:
“This use of immunity to encourage private actors to violate the rights.”
Cool story bro
Re:
… said nobody with the slightest ability to comprehend how rights or mandates work.
So is this all cellular location data, app-based location data, or something else?
Just wondering if I should start adding shortcuts to my phone to go into cellular airplane mode and switch to WiFi calling when my phone enters certain geofences.
It's a Thiel company
Peter Thiel has invested in at least 3 rounds of funding for SafeGraph. Dovetails nicely with his Palantir surveillance objectives.
Google banned them from the Play Store, but millions of phones are carrying their code.
Re:
Well if he wanted to get his hands of very very young blood to be transfused with…
What? Like its the first time I’ve heard I’m going to Hell.
Ivasion of privacy
Anyone??
TI could see the sales of data jammers going through the roof as people start using those.
Data and voice are two different bands. 3g and 4g are at 700 Mhz while voice is 1900 to 2300 Mhz.
You can block data and not affect voice. It does not violate FCC rules to jam data.
One caveat though is that you might be committing the crime of obstructing justice under STATE laws, since you would be concealing the fact that you are vistiting or helping someone to visit a abortion clinic by jamming your data connection to keep the info from being sent out.
Violation of state laws, yes
Violation of FCC rules, no
Re:
I don’t know how this belief became so widespread, but all radio jamming is illegal in the US. Yes that includes data.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
So if they try and prosecute you for going to a state where it is legal, you can always hinder prosecutors by breaking into their DA’s office computer network and erasing all the files in their computer relating to the case.
I would LOVE to see the face of the prosecutor assigned to the case when he went to pull up the files in his folder on the office computer network and found them all GONE, and that someone had hacked into his account and erased all his files, including documents related to the cases he was preparing.
If it is done right, you will never be caught.
Re:
Much like Daffy Duck swallowing nitroglycerine, there’s a problem with that trick: Even if you can do it successfully, you can only do it once.
Re: Re:
You have to use a no-log VPN in places like Panama where there is no logging and where the US has jurisdiction, NordVPN is made to order for that.
You can also use programs like KillDIsk to totally wipe the evidence from your hard disk.
No EVIDENCE = No CASE
Re: Re: Re:
Again: Even if you can do the trick successfully (and that’s still up in the air), you can only do it once. Every attempt to repeat the trick will leave more evidence of who did it and how they did it. Repeat the trick enough times and you’re going to get caught.
In situations like you described, doing the trick once will never be enough. There will always be another case to “hide” and another DA to attack. Do it once and you might get away with it—emphasis on might. But do it over and over and over and over and over and oh hey, the cops are right outside your door, wonder what they want.
Re: Re: Re:2
Programs like KillDisk cam be used to wipe all the evidence off yout hard disk
Re: Re: Re:3
That’s nice. So…how do you cover your tracks with each attempt of your “trick” when each attempt reveals more about how you do the “trick”? Loopholes and backdoors will be found and watched, and before you know it, you’ll trip their alerts and oh hey there’s a SWAT team pulling up to your house, wonder what that’s about.
You will always have another case to “hide” and another DA to attack. How can you keep doing it when doing it more than once puts your ass in jeopardy?
Re: Re: Re:
Check the top two articles on this page.
Re:
Work harder on your story lines, and in a decade or two you might write a sellable story.
Re: Re:
(> _ <) =3
Re: Re: Womp Womp
Work harder on your insults and in a decade or three someone might actually take you seriously.
Anyone up to crowdfund a couple rounds of data in DC? I bet Blumenthal would drop his crusade against “Big Tech” real quick if we could document all of his movements for a month in under $1000.
Re:
One other example of jamming that is legal is service stations jamming Bluetooth to prevent Bluetooth based credit card skimmers from sending the data back.
The bad guys are installing skimmers that use Bluetooth to send the data back.
When I was in Reno, my Bluuetoth died when I was going to Mcdonalds. As soon as I got out of the area my Blueetooth came back.
There are a few service stations in that area that could be jamming Bluuetooh.
Since they are jamming Bluetooth to protect their property, it is 100 percent LEGAL. Protecting their property by jamming Bluetooth does does not violate FCC regulations in any way.
Re: Re: Not analogous.
Bluetooth’s NFC, not long range.
I could see abortion clinics in California deploying jammera to prevent peoples’ devices from sending info back they were there.
Contrary to popular opinion, the abortion clinics would not be violating any FCC rules by deploying jammers in their facilities as long as the jammers only jam data and not voice.
Since abortions will remain legal in California, the clinics will not breaking any laws deploying jammers that prevent data on customers’ devices from being sent out to folks like those who would sell their data.
Abortion clinics would not be breaking any laws in California deploying such jammers as long as said jammers only jammed data and did not jam voice calls.
I see a big jump in jammer sales in the future.
Re:
I would be interested to see a cite (U.S. statute or CFR) for this proposition.
Re: Re:
In their defense, we’ve seen judges do dumber things from the bench. See also: The ‘Who needs SOPA’ story, I read how service was done and…. ZOMG.
I highly doubt that there is a magical way to make jamming anything legal.
Also absence of evidence can be evidence.
Gee all of these women walked into magic dead zones, good thing the apps contact the mothership immediately after exiting so we know when they went in, when they came out.
Motherboard should have obtained the real identities of some of those people, then contacted them directly and told them what was going on. A bunch of scared, pissed off people would probably raise more of a fuss than just an article alone.
Re:
You underestimate how little politicians can be swayed by baby murdering tramps.
People stand outside clinics calling them murderers, you think they would be willing to draw more attention to themselves?
Motherboard cared more about these peoples privacy than the government does and thats chilling.