Monster Energy Suing A Fishing Gear Company Claiming Customer Confusion

from the monster-mash dept

Normally when discussing a company that has appeared on our pages before for being a trademark bully, I like to list off and link to a few examples. Monster Energy, the company that makes fizzy caffeine bombs in liquid form, makes that all very silly. You need only look at all the stories we’ve done on the company to see why: there are simply too many of them from which to choose. I could be convinced that the company was, in fact, doing some kind of avant-garde art piece highlighting the horrors of the trademark bully were I not so well informed of Monster’s ridiculous behavior overall.

And here we are again. Monster Energy has sued Slimecat Rods, a fishing gear company, for trademark infringement among other things. Why? Well, some of the gear is branded as “monster” gear.

The defendants are allegedly involved in the manufacturing, design, and marketing of fishing gear. The plaintiff contends that their products use trademarks and trade dress that are similar to that of Monster in a way that may confuse consumers. The stylization and color scheme of the defendant’s logo purportedly creates a “strikingly similar commercial impression” to Monster’s.

Since the defendants allegedly market their products to a similar audience as the plaintiffs, Monster states that they are likely causing “confusion, mistake, and deception among the relevant consuming public.” Monster believes that if the misconduct continues, they will experience damage and irreparable harm to their reputation.

There are two items we have to tackle here: similarity of the trade dress and the whole “similar audience” claim. On the topic of similarity of the marks, Monster Energy does what it always does in these suits and spends several pages listing out all of its marks on the word “monster” and embedding a buttload of pictures showing those marks in commerce. Then, as is again typical, it shows the “infringing” marks to show how similar they are. For instance:

Confused? Me too! That looks nothing like the overall Monster Energy branding. Nothing in there would leave anyone looking to snag some fish confused. Slimecat’s name is prominent on the branding. It’s all very distinct. But Monster’s suit calls this use “confusingly similar”. If that doesn’t strike you as absurd, the problem lies with you.

Not content with making such silly claims, Monster goes on to note that both companies use green and black coloration in their branding, before doing a laughably deep dive into how similar some of the letters are in font.

Again, if you think those are wildly similar in terms of how different a font can be, you’re the problem, not Slimecat.

But wait, I can hear you saying, Monster makes drinks and apparel, not fish gear. These aren’t in the same market, therefore trademark shouldn’t really apply. Well, Monster’s response to that is that they sponsor fishing and outdoors events. Yes, seriously.

Since 2019, Monster has also been the official and exclusive energy drink sponsor of the American Bass Anglers, Inc. (ABA) tournament trail, and has been showcased at ABA Open Series. Each ABA Open Series division offers four one-day qualifying events in a boater/co-angler format. Monster was also featured as a sponsor in the Ultimate Bass Team Tour, including its Tournament of Champions on Lake Mohave. Photographic examples from those events are shown below.

But that isn’t the same thing as using the marks in commerce directly by providing a product or service in a certain category. KIA isn’t suddenly in the basketball business because it sponsors the NBA. I have seen this tactic attempted by other companies in the past and can’t recall it ever working.

And, when you put that alongside the spurious nature of the rest of Monster’s claims, this all comes across as bullying at best, or very stupid at worst. So, you know, pretty much par for the course for Monster Energy.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: monster energy, slimecat rods

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Monster Energy Suing A Fishing Gear Company Claiming Customer Confusion”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
PaulT (profile) says:


Unfortunately, we just run into the same issue that affects so many of these stories – they don’t get seen outside of a the very small subset of people who follow blogs like this one and take in interest in trademarks and copyright. The vast majority of their customers will never read these stories, so their reputation in the mainstream is unaffected.

In the meantime, we just get an endless cycle of stories – some company who didn’t even consider there might be some problem using an extremely common English language word has to help Monster’s lawyers rack up some billable hours, TD write an article about it, then we all wait to see who the next victim is and what twisted logic is used to pretend they have a real case.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Christopher M. Vanderwall-Brown (profile) says:

Re: When will the US Trademark Office start revoking trademark for Trademark trolling?

Would be nice if the Patent office did likewise—you act like total fuckheads, abuse your trademark, make frivolous suits, patent or trademark troll, and after some serious fines (like a % of annual global profits like the EU is suggesting for violations to its new BigTech regulatory laws), the firm loses its trademark and has a freeze on applying for new trademarks (possibly an FTC ban on acquisitions of new trademarks) for a period of years.

Maybe, going so far as to have criminal charges against the powers that be in said corp. Like, if I abuse emergency services, I can be arrested and charged for criminal misconduct and abuse of these vital services. Patent and trademark trolls waste precious time, resources, and harm the very integrity of IP/©/®/™/etc., the courts, the processes, and harm consumers and the marketplace.

If we put forth meaningful blueprints for said legislation—a roadmap to demand legislature approval state/federal, it would do all of us a lot of good—wouldn’t it be great to read articles about how these trolls get penalized for their abuses, as opposed to continuing to hear about frivolous suits that have little to no merit.

One thing the article didn’t tell me, though—when did the Fishing company start using the logo? Is it part of their name? Does this predate Monster’s application for Trademark, etc.? There’s quite a bit of useful info not included. I’m gonna check the linked article, but if that also doesn’t mention that, I figured that might be good info for future reference.

My favorite articles on this sort of topic at Techdirt have offered a bit more insight/details on the situation.

I wish to thank monster-mash dept and Timothy Geigner

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...