Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the so-sayeth dept

This week, we’ve got a lot of commonalities among the winners. Both top comments on both sides are very similar responses to the same thing! On the insightful side, both winners come from our post about how the FBI showing up at a journalist’s door is intimidation, and both are replies to someone who questioned this assertion. In first place, it’s an anonymous response:

Normally, if you wanted to talk to a journalist (or literally anyone else) about their job, you would call/email them at their place of employment and request a meeting.

Showing up randomly at their house instead says that
1) the government considers this a matter for their private, rather than professional, identity (or at least, wishes it to appear that their private life is on the hook) and
2) that the government considers this concerning enough to require disseminating their personal address to an unknown number of law enforcement personnel, who may or may not have been told anything other than “this person is of interest to the FBI.”

Do you think it would equally as un-intimidating if a couple men showed up at the local prosecutor’s home to ask some questions about the upcoming trial of Al Capone? After all, they left when requested and didn’t contact him again.

In second place, it’s TKnarr with another take on the same reply:

How would you feel if, out of the blue, a couple of big, muscular guys in biker leathers and dark glasses showed up on your doorstep wanting to talk to you about some work your employer was having you do and the vendors you were working with? They want names, phone numbers, contract details, delivery dates, all kinds of things they have no business asking about but are asking about anyway, and even if they aren’t breaking out the baseball bats yet they’re being really really insistent about you answering their questions.

For editor’s choice on the insightful side, we start out with a reply from John Roddy to someone continuing to harp on the nonexistent publisher-platform dichotomy:

The only person claiming that social media companies don’t editorialize is YOU. THEY are telling the courts that they do. And the courts are confirming that it is their right. Not because of 230, but because of 1A.

Next, it’s Eric Goldman with a comment about the silly anti-buying-bot bill:

Wil Congress ever learn?

Five years ago, Congress enacted the BOTS Act to target event ticket sniping. The FTC has brought a grand total of 1 BOTS Act enforcement action since then, yet I doubt anyone feels like event ticket sniping is fixed. So why would Congress think an anti-toy sniping law will fare any better?

Over on the funny side, both winners are similar jokes in response to our post about how Josh Hawley thinks Twitter should be broken up. BernardoVerda took first place:

Typo in the headline

Josh Hawley doesn’t ‘think’.

In second place, it’s David with his own version:

“Josh Hawley Thinks”

Found the mistake.

A talent for finding words resonating with an outrage-steered crowd is more instinct than thought. Doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be wary of catching rabies.

For editor’s choice on the funny side, we start out with a Simpsons reference in an anonymous response to a prolific commenter’s confusing and unhinged free speech rant:

Principal koby : Why, there are no children here at the 1A Club either. Am I so out of touch?

No. It’s the courts who are wrong.

Finally, it’s Rocky on our post about the revelation that the Missouri government knew journalists were not at fault in its data security fiasco, calling back to an earlier exchange:

Now I’ll just wait for tp to come here and apologize for how wrong he was.

Oh wait, Satan just called and said that Hell isn’t due to freeze over anytime soon…

That’s all for this week, folks!

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Samuel Abram (profile) says:

The unnamed "someone"

For editor’s choice on the insightful side, we start out with a reply from John Roddy to someone continuing to harp on the nonexistent publisher-platform dichotomy:

[Ed: Bolding mine]

We all know who it is. I’m glad Mr. Beadon left his name out, because if you say his name five times in the mirror, he will then appear and you can’t kick him out because you’re a publisher and not a platform.

Shane says:

How to fix no audio output device installed

The principally supported the problem of no audio output device installed on windows 10. The “no audio output device is installed” Windows 10 error occurs. When your Windows get corrupted and face trouble to spot together with your Computer’s audio hardware device or if the Windows Sound Drivers are outdated or corrupted. It also can happen if your computer’s Sound Jack has acquired some fault. The sound in our Windows system will only work with an audio device plus the right audio drivers.

Steps to fix “no audio output device installed”

  1. Sound drivers updates

The no audio output device is installed in Windows 10 error occurs due to a corrupted or outdated driver. We can update drivers manually, but it can be somewhat a daunting task. We’ll be required to find the driver source online and find the right version according to our audio device and OS version. Audio

• Driver Support this tool will scan our system and will automatically find the right drivers for it.
• Download Driver Support.
• Launch Driver Support and perform a quick scan. If there’s something wrong with our audio driver, we should see it listed
• Click on the “Fix it” option to download and install the required drivers.

  1. Reboot Your System

• When this audio device error is caused by changing hardware configurations while loading Windows.
• To prevent this from happening, we need to refrain from removing or attaching any devices or peripherals while our PC is booting up.
• Sure that we only attach or remove devices after Windows has completely loaded.

  1. Replace Defective Sound Card

• If this solution is not working so there is a good chance that we are dealing with a defective sound card.
• Whether it’s a power problem or just plain wear-and-tear, sound cards can just stop working altogether.
• Fortunately, sound cards are easy to replace and not that expensive.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...