French Gov't Walks Back Proposal To Make Publishing Images Of Police Officers Illegal After Massive Protests Erupt Across The Nation

from the of-course-it's-a-'national-security'-thing dept

For reasons only known to legislators who apparently had their ears bent to the point of detachment by law enforcement, the French government — at least briefly — believed the nation would be better secured if citizens weren’t allowed to film police officers and publish those recordings online.

A bill passed through the general assembly that would have made this act a crime.

One of its most controversial elements was Article 24, which sought to criminalise the publication of images of on-duty police officers with the intent of harming their “physical or psychological integrity”.

Under the article, offenders faced sentences of up to a year in jail and fines of 45,000 euros ($53,760) for sharing images of police officers.

This sounds like an effort to prevent doxxing but, given the breadth of the language in the proposed law, it could be read to forbid recording any officer who felt they might be harmed by their actions being documented. And it could be argued (with varying degrees of success) that any publication of images/recording depicting officers in any way they didn’t explicitly approve of is “harmful.”

And the proposal couldn’t have come at a worse time. French law enforcement is facing additional scrutiny after a recording of officers beating a black man surfaced online.

Paris’s top prosecutor has called for four police officers under investigation over the beating of a black music producer to face charges and for three of them to remain in detention as the probe continues.


The three officers suspected of carrying out the beating should remain in custody, he said, while a fourth, who arrived on the scene later and set off a tear gas canister, should be freed under conditions.

With this flame still burning, French legislators tossed this accelerant on the fire. No more documenting police activity because natsec. The citizens responded to this attempted shielding of bad cops as the French often do: with massive protests and a bit of violence.

Tens of thousands of critics of a proposed security law that would restrict the filming of police officers protested across France on Saturday, and officers in Paris who were advised to behave responsibly during the demonstrations repeatedly fired tear gas to disperse rowdy protesters who set fire to France’s central bank and threw paving stones.

Faced with consecutive protests (the one over the beating that rolled into the one over the proposed law), French legislators are backtracking.

France’s national assembly on Monday dropped a key provision of a controversial bill that would have curtailed the right to film police officers during their work.

Christophe Castaner, the head of President Emmanuel Macron’s ruling LREM party, told journalists that the bill will be scrapped and rewritten, with a new version going before parliament.

For the time being, filming the police in France is still legal, even if an officer argues they’ve been harmed by being observed. Unfortunately, the proposal isn’t completely dead. Article 24 will be revamped but it won’t be until early next year. Right now, the bill is too hot to touch. A couple of months in the cooler — and the onset of cooler weather — might temper both protesters and belatedly irate lawmakers. If so, it could reappear mostly unchanged, especially if legislators feel the security of the nation is more important than law enforcement accountability.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “French Gov't Walks Back Proposal To Make Publishing Images Of Police Officers Illegal After Massive Protests Erupt Across The Nation”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

If the French government was being intellectually honest (and who believes that), they would have just suggested outlawing evidence.

That is basically what the law would have been (with the "minor" caviet that the evidence had to be harmful to a certain group. I would be very interesting to see a logical proof that this could even be presented as logically consistent… maybe it would start with "this class of citizen is naturally superior").

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Hero says:

In the USA, you can film abuses by law enforcement, but those officers won’t be held to account. In France, you can’t film abuses by law enforcement, but the officers are being held in detention.

Between the two nations, it looks like we have the building blocks for a policy that makes sense.

That One Guy (profile) says:

If they can't take cameras then they aren't fit for the job

Because apparently it still needs to be said: If police(in any country) don’t like the idea that people might be quick to whip out cameras and start recording them they’ve only themselves and their actions to blame, and they have a really simple solution to deal with that problem, namely quitting and letting more qualified people who aren’t terrified that the public might know what the (theoretical) public servants are doing do the job.

Leave a Reply to t8ny Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »