Jim Jordan Releases Yet ANOTHER Anti-230 Bill (Yes Another One)

from the guys,-stop-it dept

Okay, this post is going to be quick because, none of us should be wasting our time on this this week. We’ve now got FOUR new bills JUST THIS WEEK seeking to undermine Section 230 (and that’s after one more last week). Obviously, it appears that Congressional Republicans have taken to heart the Trump Administration’s demand to make attacking Section 230 and the internet companies a key focus between now and the election.

Not counting all the other anti-230, anti-open internet bills from earlier this year (and last year), in just the last week we had Senator Lindsey Graham introduce the Online Content Policy Modernization Act, which was actually just a mashup of the bill he cosponsored a few weeks earlier with Senators Roger Wicker and Marsha Blackburn, combined with a dangerous copyright bill, the CASE Act.

This week, we’ve already seen Senators Manchin and Cornyn release their “force companies to snitch on everyone” See Something Say Something Act, and then on Wednesday we had two more anti-230 bills, including Senator John Kennedy’s “Don’t Push My Buttons” Act and then in the House there was Reps. Sylvia Garcia and Ann Wagner pushing their version of the EARN IT Act, which would attack both Section 230 and encryption in one single blow.

And the latest is that Rep. Jim Jordan, famous for dodging ongoing accusations of a rather horrific scandal and for constantly screaming nonsense about “anti-conservative bias,” has thrown his hat in the ring with the “Protect Speech Act.” Jordan has been pretty vocal in a few Congressional hearings (often having nothing to do with content moderation) about how “big tech” is “censoring conservatives.” He goes back to the false claim that Google threatened to pull ads from The Federalist over the site’s conservative views, ignoring of course that plenty of others sites — including Techdirt — have dealt with the same issue repeatedly.

Jordan’s new bill is really just a mashup of two other bills. One is the Graham/Wicker/Blackburn bill, along with the DOJ’s own proposed anti-230 bill which came out last week as well, because apparently THE ONLY THING THAT CONGRESS NEEDS TO FOCUS ON THESE DAYS IS SECTION 230.

The bill is both lame and unconstitutional, but I’m not going to go over why, because you can just go back to my older analysis of the Wicker/Graham bill and the DOJ bill and recognize that all of the problems with those bills are also in this one.

Even in a normal year, this would be crazy. Having so many bills, all seeking to undermine the open internet, all coming out at once, would be just generally exhausting. But the fact that it’s happening at this particular moment in time — when the open internet is a key part of what is keeping people connected and able to work and socialize, in the midst of a pandemic that Congress is mostly ignoring — is just positively preposterous.

Congress is regularly seen as out of touch with Americans. This is why. They’re playing politics and grandstanding to distract from all their failures, by trying to destroy one part of our daily lives that’s actually working right now.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Jim Jordan Releases Yet ANOTHER Anti-230 Bill (Yes Another One)”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
27 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Re:

The best part is by refusing to answer he’s not actually helping himself and is in fact shooting himself in the back as the assumption becomes that his position is that social media companies should be required to host any and all legal content but that he’s too cowardly to own it, since if the answer was no he’d have no reason not to simply say so.

That One Guy (profile) says:

'Look over there, a distraction!'

While disgusting I honestly don’t find this too surprising, with the hell that is 2020 ongoing and nothing of note beyond a really large pile of bodies to show the GOP is in dire need of something to draw attention away and rile up the gullible, and trying to kill 230 allows them to play up both the victim-complex baked in to the party and get people worked up over the current Other to hate.

Anonymous Coward says:

I wonder what’s worse EU laws that require the impossible, filter all content . Images, video audio for anything that might be infringing
or new laws that cripple section 230 and stop websites from blocking spam, racist content
and fake news and also limit the use of encryption
to protect users privacy.
And there’s also a bíll that will bring in a 30k fine for anyone that posts a random photo or meme on
a forum or social media.
That should shutdown reddit or any forum that allows user content

Bartonlmm (user link) says:

how to tell if a vietnamese girl likes you

Fox bulletins

Quotes displayed instantly or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data supplied by Factset. Powered and carried out by FactSet Digital Solutions. Legal affirmation. Mutual Fund and ETF data which is available from Refinitiv Lipper.Facebook Twitter Instagram RSS EmailFox News offers up to the second crime coverage using our unmatched resources to keep you informed on anything from news about notorious criminals, Brave criminal court officers and their beats, newest homicides and robberies, And the most challenging court cases. Be the first to know as police force conduct manhunts, check out shootings, And make seen arrests.We’ll see you in courtWant to found out most current on a big trial? Fox News has all of the updates on court actions, Jury decisions, And all of the drama surrounding one of the most high profile court cases in the country. Watch events unfold in real time with our live blog and in court coverage of the most talked about criminal research in America.Breaking crime newsNew Terms of Use [url=https://www.bestbrides.net/how-to-survive-your-first-date-with-a-chinese-lady/%5Dchineseladydate%5B/url] New Privacy Policy Do Not Sell my information Closed Captioning Policy Help Contact Us Accessibility StatementThis material may not be published, shown, Rewritten, or redistributed. 2022 FOX News provider, LLC. Quotes displayed in real time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data offered by Factset. Powered and put through by FactSet Digital Solutions. Legal policy. Mutual Fund and ETF data proposed by Refinitiv Lipper.
[—-]

Leave a Reply to Bartonlmm Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »