FCC's O'Rielly Musters A Tiny Bit Of Courage To Almost Acknowledge Trump's Executive Order Is Unenforceable Gibberish

from the standing-up-to-dear-leader dept

So we’ve already noted how Trump’s executive order governing social media is a load of fluff and nonsense. Like most brain farts that stumble out of the head of the current president, there’s been a lot of breathless hyperventilation about what the executive order means, despite the fact the order itself is largely indecipherable gibberish. You can’t ignore the rule of law and the Constitution via executive order, and the order’s underlying justification (that social media outlets disproportionately target Conservatives) is, and has always been, unsupportable bullshit.

Initially, at least, buried under the din of confusion was the fact that the order effectively just shovels the onus over to the FCC and FTC to enforce the unenforceable. To be very clear: while the order demands the FCC “expeditiously propose regulations” to crack down on social media websites, in absolutely no universe do they have the authority to do this.

Watching the FCC’s various Conservative FCC Commissioners try to avoid upsetting dear leader and acknowledging this somewhat important fact has been… entertaining. Brendan Carr responded by taking a big guzzle of the Trump Kool Aid and doubling down on his breathless praise of dear leader:

The more reserved Ajit Pai just basically hid under his desk and refused to offer much of a comment, knowing the Trump order was nonsense, but also knowing the scandal would probably soon be supplanted by something dumber. Of the three, only Mike O’Rielly appears to have mustered barely enough courage to admit the FCC might not be able to do what Trump wants. Again, because regulators can’t magically overrule the will of Congress, and precedent dictates they can’t regulate websites:

“Michael O’Rielly, part of the FCC’s 3-2 Republican majority, says he has doubts about whether the FCC has authority to implement Trump’s order regarding Twitter and other online platforms…O’Rielly discussed the topic on C-SPAN last week, saying he won’t take a position until he has researched the topic more thoroughly. “I haven’t taken a position because I have to do my homework,” O’Rielly said, adding that he has “deep reservations” that the FCC has authority to act as Trump directed.”

Mmm yes, a supposed expert on the nation’s legal and regulatory policy framework needs to apparently “do some more homework” to figure out whether the FCC has authority the vast, vast majority of experts state it clearly doesn’t have. That’s as close as you’re going to get to anything resembling political courage out of this telecom industry ass kissing FCC. And even then, O’Rielly’s commentary is filled with caveats implying that this is somehow an issue that still needs debating:

“O’Rielly said he plans to speak with people who wrote the Section 230 statute that was passed in 1996 and other “knowledgeable people about the matter,” to determine whether Congress “intentionally gave us authority, or accidentally gave us authority,” or gave the FCC “no authority…O’Rielly was a congressional staffer at the time Section 230 was passed. “My memory is pretty good on those things,” O’Rielly said. “I have deep reservations that [Congress] provided [the FCC] any intentional authority for this matter but I want to listen to people. I want to see if other memories are different from mine. There weren’t many people in the room.”

It’s not a matter of “memory.” Congress did not. There’s nothing murky here. Go ask FCC policy experts like Harold Feld, who has spent the better part of a lifetime studying the wonkiest aspects of FCC authority:

“The FCC is an independent agency. Congress deliberately insulated it from direct control of the President in order to prevent the President from using it against political opponents and to ensure representation by both political parties. As events keep showing, this turned out to be a pretty smart move.”

As Feld notes, the President can’t just demand the FCC do something. While the President can order the NTIA to file a Petition with the FCC to do something outside of its jurisdiction, that doesn’t magically mean the FCC can actually do so. As such, while this whole thing might get a docket number and see ample pearl clutching “censorship” headlines from the MAGA set right around this summer and fall election season (arguably the entire and only goal), it’s extremely unlikely it ever results in anything substantive since the EO is little more than a brain fart in prose form.

Pai, Carr, and O’Rielly all know this. O’Rielly is at least able to vaguely hint in the general direction of where reality is located way across the post-truth MAGA valley. Carr took the complete opposite tack because it’s fairly clear he has bigger, broader ambitions:

Historians, with any luck, will correctly look back at this era as one of near immeasurable sycophancy, where facts were easily and routinely discarded for the benefit of an unqualified, authoritarian leader. But in the shorter term, this whole thing will consume a ton of calories, taxpayer money, and brain power. But it’s a bunch of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Something the folks at the Pai FCC would clearly and unequivocally acknowledge had they the faintest shred of backbone.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FCC's O'Rielly Musters A Tiny Bit Of Courage To Almost Acknowledge Trump's Executive Order Is Unenforceable Gibberish”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
14 Comments
Bloof (profile) says:

Unfortunately the moment republicans retake both chambers they’re going to push horrendous changes as they’ve found something they can attack to win brownie points with the crazies in their base that probably won’t cost them any goodwill from their donors. Google probably don’t spend big money in the race for a Louisiana house seat in a district that represents one single 60 year old racist farmer and a tractor called Ayn.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

"the moment republicans retake both chambers"

This will not happen anytime soon as they have pretty much self destructed and recovery is not on their radar. This is a death cult apparently and they want to take everyone else with them. However, I do not think that I am wearing the correct tennis shoes, guess I wont be raptured then huh.

David says:

Re: Re: Re:

"the moment republicans retake both chambers"

This will not happen anytime soon as they have pretty much self destructed and recovery is not on their radar.

Democrats tend not to last more than two presidential terms in modern times. And it’s not clear, even assuming Biden wins, that he will last two terms since his main attraction is "anybody but Trump" and that may not be enough to last two terms.

Even assuming two full terms, the judge rubberstamping machine currently ongoing in the Senate will have political consequences for much longer and will hamstring any convincing reforms that would make people see long-term success in what Democrats try to achieve.

Republicans are not preparing as much for suicide as for hibernation.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

I see your points however – I think the repubs have really screwed the pooch this time and there is no turning back the clock. Their unwavering support of the failed administration with its failed policies in addition to their willing participation in the criminal activity conducted by this administration should land them in jail, but we all know that will not happen.

tldr: It is different this time (lol)

Anonymous Coward says:

Watching the FCC’s various Conservative FCC Commissioners try to avoid upsetting dear leader and acknowledging this somewhat important fact has been… entertaining

It’s also scary as fuck. It’s scary watching civil servants and even Trump-supporting types making statements while trying not to upset the emperor-in-his-own-mind when they know damn well that reality lies 200 miles in the opposite direction of that on which they are commenting.

Bartonetb (user link) says:

asian dating rules

nobody knows why the crows are dying in a Charlottetown park

CHARLOTTETOWN It was during the holiday break that something awful started happening to the crows that frequent Victoria Park in downtown Charlottetown.

subsequently, Local residents have found more than 200 dead or anxiously ill birds. Scientists at the nearby Atlantic Veterinary College haven been able to figure out the proceedings.

"It was pretty ugly, Maryrose Carson, Who lives two blocks from the beachfront park, Said Tuesday as she recalled finding tons of dead birds on Jan. 1. "We had little idea what had caused it,

The college has ruled out avian flu or a bacterial infection, And on the internet speculation that a so called reovirus is to blame a theory that is being subjected to laboratory testing, Carson assumed.

There also concern that whatever is killing the birds could spread to other wildlife or trained animals, which describes why the college is pressing for answers before the end of the week. A spokeswoman for the college declined to comment until the outcomes are in.

A log in of 25,000 birds roosts around the block every night in the fall and winter, Prompting an annual outpouring of complaints about the ceaseless squawking and defecating.

When the birds swarm over the area at this time of the year, The cacophony can be deafening as the sky turns black with beating wings, such as a scene from a horror movie.

as such, Carson said she worried the coal coloured birds will be poisoned.

"I do understand the rage, She pronounced. "If you walk in the Brighton Road area if they are roosting I don think there is a clean spot on the sidewalk,

reality poison is a theory, Carson was quick to note that it appears no other animals in your community have been affected.

She said it sad to see the sickly birds in the park.

"They very lethargic. If they do try to escape you, they struggle to hop, She being said. "They might fly a couple of feet uphill, But then they down on a lawn and very docile. whether you holding them, They rather than fighting,Local residents are being warned not to fund any dead birds or approach any that appear ill. The City of Charlottetown is liable for disposing of the dead birds, While the faculty is taking in ill animals for treatment.

Two these days, Bird lovers in the location were outraged when somebody shot three crows with a pellet gun during a five week span. The shootings advised a "rally for caws, about 15 people marching to demand the birds be [url=https://www.love-sites.com/signs-that-you-can-recognise-when-a-vietnamese-lady-is-into-you/%5Dhow to tell if a vietnamese girl likes you[/url] left alone.

At some part, The city website recognized that residents had developed a "Love hate alliance" utilizing avian neighbours, Which have been calling the park home over 100 years.

on 2006, The city decided claims about the noise and the droppings had reached a point where action had to be taken.

filthy, witty, Rotten challenges, One resident said during the time. Get up a. m,most morning and the sidewalks are white. automobiles sold in the are white. I don sit in the yard anymore. After with proposals, state spent $15,000 on noisemakers to turn the birds away.

It didn job.

since then, The city has decided to live with the birds, But the complaints frequently come.

This report by The Canadian Press was published Jan. 18, 2022. ‘re feeling the housing crunch more than most, With rising rental costs exceeding fixed incomes for those on pensions or social solutions. clearly ask Valerie Arsenault. The Charlottetown woman landlord took the names of several renters at the Kensington Road apartment building where she lives, position them into a hat and drew one out. the entire "safe bet" Would have to give that up his or her unit so that his son could move into it. "I was handed an eviction notice back on October 4th because mCORRECTED UPDATE 3 Unilever will not raise rejected 50 bln pound bid for GSK consumer arm.
[—-]

Leave a Reply to Chargone Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »