COVID-19 Will Someday Fade Away. The Wireless Location Data Practices Being Embraced To Track It Probably Won't.

from the nobody's-watching-the-watchers dept

Location data has long proven to be hugely profitable to wireless carriers, given it’s used by everyone from city planners to marketing departments. Now it’s proving useful to help spread the track of COVID-19, allowing researchers to see not only who an infected person has been in contact with and where they’ve been, but also helping them predict where hot spots might appear next. Such technology was used during the Ebola outbreak in West Africa to help both track and predict the movement of the disease.

Now the government says it’s working in partnership with the advertising industry to use such location data here in the States. The Wall Street Journal (paywall, alternative read at The Verge) indicates the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state and local governments have already received cell phone data about people in areas of ?geographic interest.” In this case, to track movements and determine how well people are adhering to “stay at home” restrictions:

“The goal is to create a government portal with geolocation information from some 500 cities across the country, to help ascertain how well people are complying with stay-at-home orders, according to the WSJ. One example of how the anonymized data was reportedly used: Researchers discovered large numbers of people were gathering in a New York City park, and notified local authorities.”

Of course just because we’re in a pandemic doesn’t mean that privacy concerns magically evaporate, or that we shouldn’t make an effort to respect citizen privacy. We’ve noted repeatedly that anonymized location data isn’t really anonymous, and individual identities can usually be ferreted out with little to no effort. The more widely this data circulates, the more likely the chance is it’s abused by everybody from industry and government to hackers and con artists.

The other obvious problem is that the fear of a pandemic creates wonderful cover to abuse the collection of this data for other, less noble purposes. The wireless industry was just busted selling access to this data to any nitwit with a nickel, which is likely why government is collaborating with the ad sector and not carriers directly (at least not yet, and as far as we know). The Washington Post also indicates that Google and Facebook, fresh off one of the biggest privacy scandals in U.S. history, are also collaborating with the government in regards to location data.

As anybody tracking this space knows, it’s extremely difficult to claw surveillance power back from the government once it’s been obtained, and with the U.S. still having no real privacy law for the internet era, it’s a virtual certainty that the collection of this data will be abused. There could certainly be ways to mitigate that harm — such as sunset provisions on collection and strict rules governing how this data can be used — but we’d already made it abundantly clear as a nation we weren’t particularly interested in such options, and with a climate of fear likely overshadowing everything, it’s not likely we’re about to start now.

While it takes a while, the threat posed by COVID-19 will eventually retreat. The surveillance practices we normalize during this period will very likely be here to stay.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “COVID-19 Will Someday Fade Away. The Wireless Location Data Practices Being Embraced To Track It Probably Won't.”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Practice or data?

It’s certainly a trade-off. While tracking people (maybe even especially their recent histories) is good for helping to control the pandemic, there are privacy issues with this kind of tracking. When the crisis is over, or mostly over, and people start complaining again about privacy, there will be a large number who will point back at the crisis and say ‘but look at how much good it did’. Well, it might have, but that was for a specific purpose, what is the purpose now? Then they will cry, we need to have the ability to do this in the future for the next pandemic. And we will say, maybe so, but in the mean time…my privacy is mine, not yours.

Then there is the data. Once the data is used for crisis amelioration, what other purposes will it be used for? At the very least, and for the purpose of privacy, limits should be put upon the use of location data, as the 4th Amendment and cell site impersonator limitations are saying. The problem will be in actually controlling those uses, as we have experience with the government not being entirely forthcoming about how they go about abusing their power.

fairuse (profile) says:

Virus explained in readable english - there will be a quiz

Twitter that outstanding public chalkboard loved by all sometimes has facts.

This is description on how Coronavirus-2019 got here and what it does and a what if part. Thread is several posts then long comment part. Easy read.
Who is he?

Not a policy wonk

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

In Louisville, they are already making people under quarantine wear ankle bracelets.

Of course those can be jammed with jammer that can jam celluar data but voice.

If the bracelet is using TMoble or Metro, you can jam data without jamming voice becuase voice and data as on totally different frequency bands.

Jamming data is not iilegal as long as you do not jam voice, at least under US federal law.

When I had a neighbor here in my apartment building who jammed data during dinnertime, he had Metro, so he could jam data without affecting voice calls on nearby Metro customers. Voice calls went through but data was shut down when the jammer was on to keep his kids off cell phone Internet

The management company here, HomeRiver, told me there was nothing they could do unless he jammed voice, which he did not. They told me that he was breaking no laws jamming data as long as he did not jam voice, so they declined to take any action.

nasch (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Currently it is not a crime to jam data, as long as you do not jam wireless internet

Citation needed.

"The use of "cell jammers" or similar devices designed to intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications (signal blockers, GPS jammers, or text stoppers, etc.) is a violation of federal law."

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...