AT&T Loses Another 1.36 Million Pay TV Subscribers Thanks To Relentless Price Hikes

from the ill-communication dept

This wasn’t how it was supposed to go for AT&T. In AT&T executives heads, the 2015, $67 billion acquisition of DirecTV and the 2018 $86 billion acquisition of Time Warner were supposed to be the cornerstones of the company’s efforts to dominate video and online video advertising. Instead, the megadeals made AT&T possibly one of the most heavily indebted companies in the world. To recoup that debt, AT&T has increased its efforts to nickel-and-dime users at every opportunity, recently imposing the second rate hike in just a year on its streaming TV subscribers.

Not too surprisingly, these price hikes are now driving subscribers to the exits.

AT&T’s latest earnings report indicates that the company lost another 1.16 million video subscribers from its traditional DirecTV and IPTV TV services. The company also lost another 195,000 subscribers from its streaming TV platform, creatively dubbed AT&T TV. All told, AT&T lost another 1.36 million TV subscribers in a single quarter; again not the kind of domination AT&T expected when it decided to merge its way to sector dominance.

Like Verizon, AT&T got bored with simply running quality networks and lobbying to crush competition; both have eyed Google and Facebook ad revenues as they push harder into the video advertising space. But competition there has not been easy going for either government-pampered monopoly, Verizon’s own fusion of Yahoo and AOL doing repeated face plants, mostly notably the failure of its Go90 Millennial-focused streaming platform. And while AT&T’s had better luck making streaming TV and advertising inroads, these numbers clearly indicate slow sledding.

Even AT&T investors have started to grow impatient with AT&T’s obsession with growth for growth’s sake. After a bit of an investor revolt, AT&T had to promise it would make no major mergers or acquisitions in the next three years.

AT&T, meanwhile, has been busy trying to hype its upcoming HBO Max streaming service, the latest in an AT&T TV streaming branding effort that’s so convoluted, it has confused the company’s own employees. Undaunted by recent issues, AT&T’s telling anybody who’ll listen that the service should grab somewhere around 50 million subscribers by 2025:

“This is going to be a meaningful business for us over the next four or five years and we’re talking a 50 million subscriber business and we’re really enthusiastic about this,” AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said during an analyst call. The AT&T boss clarified his domestic forecast of 50 million subscribers was for five years to 2025.”

The problem, for AT&T, is that it’s already proven incapable of retaining or adding subscribers in the current market. With Apple and Disney poised to join the crowded field in November, the battle for streaming domination is only going to get harder for ma bell.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: at&t

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “AT&T Loses Another 1.36 Million Pay TV Subscribers Thanks To Relentless Price Hikes”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Your call is important to us, please hold for the next available agent.
. cue really annoying muzak .
Your call is important to us, please hold for the next available agent.
. cue really annoying muzak .
Your call is important to us, please hold for the next available agent.
. cue really annoying muzak .

ryuugami says:

Re: They could easily get to 50 million subscribers in 2025


AT&T had to promise it would make no major mergers or acquisitions in the next three years.

domestic forecast of 50 million subscribers was for five years to 2025.

… they’ll have 2 years to find & acquire a streaming service with 50 million subscribers 🙂

ECA (profile) says:

Cut off your D... to get an extra 1"..

I thought it was bad that we all had to pay for ESPN..
So, you go hog wild to purchase a Corp, you have little understanding up. Fire at least 1/4 of that personnel,
Dont think of the BASIC concepts of Business…"If it aint going well NOW, why the hell are you buying something Else, that Isnt doing well.

The Ideal concept would have been…DROP PRICES.. 10-15% and you would of gained Million of people…EVEN LOCK the prices for the Full CONTRACT…not just the first year..

there is only 1 reason for this(a few really).
Dropping the stock price.
Cutting their Own throats.
Selling off to another Corp..For Less money then they spent, making it a LOSS, and no taxes..

Anyone think ATT is being a Stooge?? A front corp to get all these other corps under 1 Corp…then to sell off to another at a lowball price..(seen it before)

Dump all the I dont think they have Paid the Whole amounts, for those corps yet..
ATT is an LLC(no large corp is supposed to be LLC, or ever should be)
Boss, Managers, CEO, and all hte heads in the the different sections of this corp, can walk away as NOT responsible…
For being idiots,
Not knowing basic Corp laws(or do they)
Caring for customers..
For anything and everything..
Just sell it off and not loose any sleep as you have all been paid, and WE CANT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT..

Unless, we can prove Malfeasance, and that they did this on purpose with Forethought..MAYBE..if we get a good judge.
But is this Wrong doing? NO law against it.

Anonymous Coward says:

although the subject is different, the principle is the same. a Nordic country, possibly Sweden but unsure now as it happened quite a while back, was continuously losing money on its train service. the action agreed and taken was to drastically reduce the cost of train travel. the result was that the debt previously incurred was paid, the trains were running at far greater occupancy and frequency, with extra trains having to be brought into service on the more popular routes and the roads were far less congested, leading to fewer accidents and fewer road repairs plus cargo that couldn’t be moved by train and had to continue to use the roads was held up less which also helped and pleased customers. it was a complete win. the moral being, if prices are at a rate that customers can afford and feel are fair considering the service they get, they use that service more and profits increase rather than decrease. the likes of Comcast and others are so focused on screwing customers over, they see nothing but price increases, not just as a way to make a service profitable for them but also as a way of enticing investors. what a ridiculous way of carrying on thinking when it has failed multiple times already!! still, you cant put sense where there isn’t room for it to fit, can you!!

austinite007 (profile) says:

I was going to get AT&T TV Now but after reading about the multiple price hikes this year that they forced on existing customers and now this background on how they foolishly purchased two struggling companies that were themselves struggling to stay relevant in back then market conditions for a whooping 157 billion dollars (combined total approximate acquisition cost), no wonder AT&T is struggling from a financial stand point. How in world are they going to even begin to pay off that kind of debt! Marginally, increasing prices for customers can only bring in so much revenue for debt load like that! I think AT&T has reached a tipping point with their subscriber base in both the TV business and their wireless business and now there appears to be a new beginning of mass exodus from their services where people are leaving for a number of reasons but price hikes and better features/services elsewhere has to definitely be contributing to it. Since AT&T once upon a time was built on a land line phone company that enjoyed a monopolistic market for many decades, it seems that they have struggled to adapt ever since the internet messed up their nice little monopoly based business model. They now need to compete more heavily than ever in the TV industry with so many streaming services and even more streaming services starting to offer the same programming/channels with better features like unlimited DVR/multiple user accounts, etc. Also, TMobile is slowly starting to roll out a much better network that will one day catch up to AT&T’s coverage. Future does not look good for AT&T, I think I need to avoid doing business with this company where possible.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...