Lawsuit Settlement Over Detainment Of A Journalist Will Force Denver Police Department To Admit The First Amendment Exists

from the being-deliberately-wrong-is-just-playing-the-odds dept

Last summer, Denver police officers decided the First Amendment didn’t exist in the city, at least not while they were in the process of helping a naked black man get some medical attention by handcuffing him in the middle of the sidewalk.

Denver PD officers Adam Paulsen and James Brooks noticed journalist Susan Greene filming the incident and decided she needed some law enforcement herself. So they approached her and told her to stop filming by citing an inapplicable law. For whatever reason, they also told her to “act like a lady.” Greene was handcuffed and placed in a squad car for 12 minutes before a less-stupid cop contacted these officers and told them to release her.

The whole incident was captured by officers’ body cameras, including the repeated suggestion the journalist wasn’t “acting like a lady” by contesting the officers’ decision to cuff her and put her in the nearest squad car.

Here was the bullshit the cops used to try to shut Greene down:

As Greene detailed in a post the next day, and as the body-cam footage confirms, she approached the scene and was immediately blocked by Officer James Brooks.

He continues to block her as she tries to keep shooting, at one point raising the camera high above Brooks’s head.

Brooks is quickly joined by Officer Adam Paulsen, and the two advise her that she can not take photographs because doing so violates the HIPAA rights of the nearly naked man they have cuffed. HIPAA or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act outlines an individual’s rights to medical privacy.

To be clear, HIPAA isn’t violated when officers perform an ultra-weird medical consultation in the middle of public street — one that involves a strategically-draped towel and a pair of handcuffs. If this man was ultimately taken in for a medical/mental examination and those records were handed over to the reporter, that would be a HIPAA violation. Shooting footage of public servants on a public street performing their public duties doesn’t violate the privacy of anyone, medical or otherwise.

The officers also claimed she was interfering with the non-arrest the officers claimed they were not making, apparently oblivious of the fact that they had approached the journalist, rather than the other way around. They also trotted out the “stop resisting” canard to pre-exonerate themselves for their aggressive handling of a person armed with a camera.

Throughout the entire thing — at least all the way up till the settlement the city is planning to pay Susan Greene — Denver PD brass acted with useless decorum. Shortly after the incident went public, Police Chief Paul Pazen said people were way too focused on officers ignoring the First Amendment, rather than expressing their concern for the naked person his officers had handcuffed in the middle of the sidewalk.

“It doesn’t appear that you’re asking any questions with regards to how an individual is treated who’s in crisis,” he said at one point in the interview. “That’s really what we all should be focusing in on.”

“In a situation like this, we should look at the whole picture, not just certain segments that could point one person in a bad light.”

Actually, it was two people, chief. And they put themselves in a “bad light” with their actions. The public shouldn’t be deterred from asking why police officers are violating Constitutional rights, even if there are other issues at play.

More disheartening was the complaint process, in which one of the officer’s supervisors pretty much said filing a complaint would be a waste of everyone’s time.

I called Denver Police Department’s District 6 and spoke with Sgt. Shawn Saunders, who supervises Officer Brooks. He said he’d look into the incident and make sure the halo camera footage and other evidence are preserved for review. He gave me the option of filing a formal complaint against Officer Brooks. I told him I’d consider it, but that I don’t have a lot of confidence in Denver’s disciplinary system, which I’ve seen slap officers on the wrists for misconduct far more serious than this, only to have the Career Service Board side with the police union and overturn even the most meager disciplinary measures.

To that, Saunders offered a response that was at once striking yet maddening in its candor.

Yeah, he told me. “I don’t have a lot of confidence in it, either.”

Part of the system works. But it will still be citizens paying for it. Susan Greene is about to receive a payout from the city of Denver.

Denver’s Police Department has agreed to a $50,000 settlement with Colorado Independent Editor Susan Greene, whose First Amendment rights officers violated when they wrongfully handcuffed and detained her for photographing police last summer.

The officers who handcuffed and detained her were also punished… by losing two days of pay each.

Finally, the Denver PD will be forced to refresh itself on the contours of Constitutional protections — basic stuff these officers were certainly aware of before they decided government might beats First Amendment rights.

As part of the settlement, Denver agrees to significantly strengthen First Amendment and sensitivity trainings for police through at least 2024. The department also will update its policies on police bias and search and seizure of recording devices.

We know officers aren’t expected to know the intricacies of the laws they enforce. In fact, they’re barely expected to know anything about the multiple statutes they use to detain and arrest people. But we should expect them to know just enough about Constitutional protections to realize they can’t handcuff a person just for filming them. The thing is, they very likely do know this. Some officers just choose to ignore this knowledge because they think they might get away with it. They didn’t here, and now citizens will be footing the bill for these officers and their unwillingness to respect the rights of the people they’re supposed to protect.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Lawsuit Settlement Over Detainment Of A Journalist Will Force Denver Police Department To Admit The First Amendment Exists”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
27 Comments
That One Guy (profile) says:

Sure about that?

The thing is, they very likely do know this. Some officers just choose to ignore this knowledge because they think they might get away with it. They didn’t here, and now citizens will be footing the bill for these officers and their unwillingness to respect the rights of the people they’re supposed to protect.

The officers who handcuffed and detained her were also punished… by losing two days of pay each.

The taxpayers are out $50,000.

Those actually responsible are out two days worth of pay.

Unless Denver police are paid $12,500 per day(and if they are that probably needs looking into…) that certainly sounds like they ‘got away with it’ to me.

Bergman (profile) says:

Re: Sure about that?

This sort of thing is why I have been suggesting for years that while you can certainly sue after the fact, it does little or nothing to deter future misbehavior.

But here’s the thing — anything you could sue in federal court for under Title 42, Section 1983 and win, is also a criminal act (in the handcuffs, booking, jailing and posting bail sense) under Title 18, Sections 241 and 242.

You can make a completely binding, stands up in court citizen’s arrest using words alone. The US Supreme Court ruled that if a citizen can make an arrest for a given type of state level crime (misdemeanor, breach of peace, felony, etc) they can also make a federal level citizen’s arrest under similar circumstances.

So if you see a cop violating rights while in possession of a firearm, or two (or more) cops acting together to violate rights, use your words and inform them that you are arresting them. You don’t even need to have a bystander do it — being under arrest does not prevent you from making arrests, unless you are doing so as a form of resisting or escaping from arrest.

Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: You contradict yourself

"She had no cause to be filming and should think that over next time."

Why not? She’s a reporter and they are public servants doing a job in public. To her credit, she wasn’t waiting for the ‘if it bleeds it leads’ opportunity.

And, in simple fact, she caught those public servants doing things they shouldn’t have been doing. The public has a right to know about those things.

Dan Neely (profile) says:

“It doesn’t appear that you’re asking any questions with regards to how an individual is treated who’s in crisis,” he [Police Chief Paul Pazen] said at one point in the interview. “That’s really what we all should be focusing in on.”

Well if you insist on bringing it up, leaving an apparently mentally ill person cuffed on the sidewalk for any length of time with only a towel attempting to protect his dignity doesn’t make your people look that good either.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: '... wait, no, don't focus on that either.'

Yeah, as excuses go that one was rather counter-productive.

‘Don’t focus on how the cops on the scene reacted to someone filming them by making bad excuses and finally arresting them, focus on the fact that they ignored an almost naked person handcuffed and left in the middle of the street while they were harassing the person filming them.’

Because that makes them look so much better…

bhull242 (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Yeah, I don’t see how that makes me see the cops in any better of a light seeing how they treat a naked black man with a medical problem by handcuffing him as opposed to detaining a female journalist filming the “non-arrest” from a distance while telling her to “act more ladylike”. Well, except that the former merely suggests that the cops may be bigots while the latter leaves little room to doubt.

Anonymous Coward says:

“It doesn’t appear that you’re asking any questions with regards to how an individual is treated who’s in crisis,” …

The only statement I could find regarding how the particular "individual" involved was treated is from the Colorado Independent …

Dulacki [a records administrator] did say, however, that the naked man, who’s not been identified, was not arrested. He has been released from the hospital.

So he wasn’t ill enough or important enough for the police to identify. Nice wookie you have there, Chief Pazen.

Ed (profile) says:

Not a punishment for the cops

Rogue cops will continue to be rogue as long as they are never personally punished. Taxpayers get punished, but not the cops. Take their pensions! Hit them in their own pockets. Sue the unions who protect bad cops. Strip them of everything they own. It is way past time to attack cops and their unions with RICO violations. They are worse than the MAFIA.

Leave a Reply to Dave P. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
15:42 Supreme Court Shrugs Off Opportunity To Overturn Fifth Circuit's Batshit Support Of Texas Drag Show Ban (62)
15:31 Hong Kong's Zero-Opposition Legislature Aims To Up Oppression With New 'National Security' Law (33)
09:30 5th Circuit Is Gonna 5th Circus: Declares Age Verification Perfectly Fine Under The First Amendment (95)
13:35 Missouri’s New Speech Police (67)
15:40 Florida Legislator Files Bill That Would Keep Killer Cops From Being Named And Shamed (38)
10:49 Fifth Circuit: Upon Further Review, Fuck The First Amendment (39)
13:35 City Of Los Angeles Files Another Lawsuit Against Recipient Of Cop Photos The LAPD Accidentally Released (5)
09:30 Sorry Appin, We’re Not Taking Down Our Article About Your Attempts To Silence Reporters (41)
10:47 After Inexplicably Allowing Unconstitutional Book Ban To Stay Alive For Six Months, The Fifth Circuit Finally Shuts It Down (23)
15:39 Judge Reminds Deputies They Can't Arrest Someone Just Because They Don't Like What Is Being Said (33)
13:24 Trump Has To Pay $392k For His NY Times SLAPP Suit (16)
10:43 Oklahoma Senator Thinks Journalists Need Licenses, Should Be Trained By PragerU (88)
11:05 Appeals Court: Ban On Religious Ads Is Unconstitutional Because It's Pretty Much Impossible To Define 'Religion' (35)
10:49 Colorado Journalist Says Fuck Prior Restraint, Dares Court To Keep Violating The 1st Amendment (35)
09:33 Free Speech Experts Realizing Just How Big A Free Speech Hypocrite Elon Is (55)
15:33 No Love For The Haters: Illinois Bans Book Bans (But Not Really) (38)
10:44 Because The Fifth Circuit Again Did Something Ridiculous, The Copia Institute Filed Yet Another Amicus Brief At SCOTUS (11)
12:59 Millions Of People Are Blocked By Pornhub Because Of Age Verification Laws (78)
10:59 Federal Court Says First Amendment Protects Engineers Who Offer Expert Testimony Without A License (17)
12:58 Sending Cops To Search Classrooms For Controversial Books Is Just Something We Do Now, I Guess (221)
09:31 Utah Finally Sued Over Its Obviously Unconstitutional Social Media ‘But Think Of The Kids!’ Law (47)
12:09 The EU’s Investigation Of ExTwitter Is Ridiculous & Censorial (37)
09:25 Media Matters Sues Texas AG Ken Paxton To Stop His Bogus, Censorial ‘Investigation’ (44)
09:25 Missouri AG Announces Bullshit Censorial Investigation Into Media Matters Over Its Speech (108)
09:27 Supporting Free Speech Means Supporting Victims Of SLAPP Suits, Even If You Disagree With The Speakers (74)
15:19 State Of Iowa Sued By Pretty Much Everyone After Codifying Hatred With A LGBTQ-Targeting Book Ban (157)
13:54 Retiree Arrested For Criticizing Local Officials Will Have Her Case Heard By The Supreme Court (9)
12:04 Judge Says Montana’s TikTok Ban Is Obviously Unconstitutional (4)
09:27 Congrats To Elon Musk: I Didn’t Think You Had It In You To File A Lawsuit This Stupid. But, You Crazy Bastard, You Did It! (151)
12:18 If You Kill Two People In A Car Crash, You Shouldn’t Then Sue Their Relatives For Emailing Your University About What You Did (47)
More arrow