Twitter And Facebook Removing Chinese Disinfo Campaigns Shows That, Contrary To Popular Opinion, They Do Moderate Against Disinfo

from the moderation-happens dept

Leaving aside the ridiculous and ignorant suggestions from some that no internet platforms should moderate anything, many, many people seem to believe (incorrectly) that the various internet companies refuse to moderate anything because it goes against their bottom lines. We’ve heard this from a number of politicians — especially among those seeking to change Section 230, arguing (again, incorrectly) that because of Section 230 there’s somehow no incentive to moderate content on their platforms.

This is wrong on multiple levels. There is tremendous business, political, moral, and social pressure to moderate content on these platforms. When they get it wrong, they get criticized. They can lose users. And (importantly) they can lose advertisers, partners, customers and investors. There is demand for “healthy” platforms, and it’s Section 230 that allows them to experiment and moderate accordingly. That’s why it’s notable to me that both Twitter and Facebook announced the removal of what appears to be a coordinated attempt to abuse both platforms to push disinformation against protesters in Hong Kong. Here’s Facebook’s announcement:

Today, we removed seven Pages, three Groups and five Facebook accounts involved in coordinated inauthentic behavior as part of a small network that originated in China and focused on Hong Kong. The individuals behind this campaign engaged in a number of deceptive tactics, including the use of fake accounts ? some of which had been already disabled by our automated systems ? to manage Pages posing as news organizations, post in Groups, disseminate their content, and also drive people to off-platform news sites. They frequently posted about local political news and issues including topics like the ongoing protests in Hong Kong. Although the people behind this activity attempted to conceal their identities, our investigation found links to individuals associated with the Chinese government.

And here’s Twitter’s announcement:

This disclosure consists of 936 accounts originating from within the People?s Republic of China (PRC). Overall, these accounts were deliberately and specifically attempting to sow political discord in Hong Kong, including undermining the legitimacy and political positions of the protest movement on the ground. Based on our intensive investigations, we have reliable evidence to support that this is a coordinated state-backed operation. Specifically, we identified large clusters of accounts behaving in a coordinated manner to amplify messages related to the Hong Kong protests.

As Twitter is blocked in PRC, many of these accounts accessed Twitter using VPNs. However, some accounts accessed Twitter from specific unblocked IP addresses originating in mainland China. The accounts we are sharing today represent the most active portions of this campaign; a larger, spammy network of approximately 200,000 accounts ? many created following our initial suspensions ? were proactively suspended before they were substantially active on the service.

Despite common perception, both companies have put a lot of effort into discovering and stopping these kinds of efforts. Of course, none of it will be perfect, because content moderation at scale is impossible to do well. Mistakes of both false positives and false negatives are inevitable. But, if anyone thinks that modifying Section 230 will magically make companies better at this, they’re not paying attention. Adding more liability to companies over their moderation choices won’t make these efforts any better or any easier — they might just bog the companies down in lawsuits.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: facebook, twitter

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Twitter And Facebook Removing Chinese Disinfo Campaigns Shows That, Contrary To Popular Opinion, They Do Moderate Against Disinfo”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

“I’m not really impressed”

Your a trolling account that uses random names and The same bad arguments over and over in different ways that now everyone knows your just one guy blue lol if you were on Twitter you would have been Alex Jones before people got tired of him lol and people gave that ass a lot of room to move for the sake of the first amendment myself included before he got kicked out of that bar.

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

Probably not Blue/Baghdad Bob. Note that the snarky one-liner actually comes with a point. An assortment of 15 url’s IS indeed not too impressive for a country the size of China.

The lithmus test for a genuine out-of-the-blue Baghdad bob rant is that snarky triumphant tone when pointing out a state of affairs which can not be found anywhere in factual reality.

TFG says:

Re: Re: Re:

You kinda suck at this Blue spotting thing. Pixelation’s a pretty common commenter.

Look, I’ll lay it out for you: Blue picks a stupid name that is a pun, Not just a single word. Something along the lines of "Pal in drone strikes." Pixelation or Seattle don’t fit the pattern.

Blue then types out a multi-paragraph rant with sections derogatory toward TechDirt and Mike in particular, and never makes an actual valid point.

Now granted, its possible he’s changing tactics after realizing that this makes him easy to spot, but I don’t think he has the wherewithal to do so. I’d really suggest stepping back from the blue-spotting thing, you’re firing your guns at the wrong people.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...