Colorado Net Neutrality Bill Heads To Governor's Desk For Signing

from the ill-communication dept

You can add Colorado to the growing list of states finalizing state-level net neutrality legislation. Colorado’s new Senate Bill 78 would not only block ISPs from engaging in all the usual anti-competitive shenanigans (blocking or otherwise throttling a competing service), but it would also force ISPs to pay back state taxpayer-backed grants if they engage in said behaviors. After a last-second GOP attempt to add porn filters to the legislation failed, the bill passed the Colorado General Assembly last week and heads to the desk of Colorado Governor Jared Polis for signature.

Colorado legislators note the effort is just one of 120 bills and resolutions in 34 states (and DC) crafted on this subject since Ajit Pai’s FCC voted to kill net neutrality in late 2017. The bills are a direct reflection of the strong bipartisan majority of Americans that support such protections.

As we’ve seen countless times before, telecom industry backed organizations like the AT&T-funded Colorado Competitive Council were quick to complain that such state-level efforts would only create regulatory confusion, and that enforcement of net neutrality should be left to the FTC:

“An open internet is a critical issue, and the federal government has been clear that it is in their purview. (Senate Bill 78) is unnecessary and would only add to a patchwork of regulations, confusing the regulatory certainty that exists in Colorado today,? said Nicholas J. Colglazier, director of Colorado Competitive Council, and who testified against the bill. ?The Federal Trade Commission has authority to enforce the open internet practices of internet service providers, and has demonstrated its willingness to do so.”

Local ISP CenturyLink also came out against the perils of a “patchwork” of state-level regulation on this subject:

“A patchwork of state-by-state regulations of the internet, which is what Colorado SB 78 calls for, is not the right approach for this important policy.”

But again, the industry likes to ignore the fact that if they hadn’t lobbied to kill modest FCC net neutrality rules, states wouldn’t be pursuing this route in the first place. It’s the telecom industry that’s responsible for this “regulatory confusion,” though they’re the last ones apparently willing to own up to that fact. Meanwhile, the telecom lobby pushed hard to shift ISP oversight from the FCC to FTC specifically because they know the latter lacks the authority and resources to actually do so, another fact the telecom sector likes to tap dance around as the industry complains about the direct outcome of its own actions.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Colorado Net Neutrality Bill Heads To Governor's Desk For Signing”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
That One Guy (profile) says:

Oh the poor babies...

Kill off the single federal set of rules that would have applied across the entire country, and then whine like spoiled children about ‘patchwork regulations’ when individual states take up the slack, resulting in numerous sets.

It is beyond rich that their attempt to gut any regulations over the industry have instead resulted in multiple sets of regulations, and for all the whining about how it’s just such a bother to deal with regulations that might differ by state, well, maybe should have thought of that before they killed off the single set, no?

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Oh the poor babies...

If memory serves he’s already tried just that. It’s been a few months(at least) but I think the angle he tried to go with is that only the FCC has the ability to regulate the relevant companies, and as such can prohibit the states from doing so, with the counter-point that the states and their lawyers used was that since the FCC by it’s own choice gave up the power to do just that it also gave up the power to tell the states what they could and couldn’t do on the matter.

Gary (profile) says:

The Other Hand...

On the one hand, interstate commerce is really supposed to be a job for the Federales.

On the other hand – the whole thing is too silly with the telcoes crying bloody murder.

I guess if the law is crafted to punish telcoes at the state level – it is within stats rights to withhold payment at the very least. Getting their grants back is something they should do regardless, since the telcoes have reneged on the terms regardless.

Anonymous Coward says:

extremes are the problem

There’s 3 sides to every story:
what he said
what she said
and what really happened.
In a nut shell, the net neutrality debate has 2 extremes that are both erroneous. The extreme democratic view (too much government regulation) would only lead to bureaucratic clog ups in a slower, censored internet; while the extreme republican view (no government regulation) would lead to geographic ISP monopolies (or oligopolies) with ever increasing "service" fees.
In the end, as long as we, the consumers, continue to pay the ISPs, nothing will change.
Stop waiting on lobbyist paid politicians to do what we can do for ourselves. March on Washington, local ISP protests, sit-ins at Comcast’s headquarters, something!

Thad (profile) says:

Re: extremes are the problem

The extreme democratic view (too much government regulation) would only lead to bureaucratic clog ups in a slower, censored internet

Who is advocating for this? Cite names of specific Democratic officeholders, please.

In the end, as long as we, the consumers, continue to pay the ISPs, nothing will change.

"Just stop using the Internet," says guy on the Internet.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: extremes are the problem

You do realize that both sides of the aisle are paid by lobbyists, right?
You do realize that both sides of the aisle generally unanimously vote for their own pay raises?
You do realize that both sides of the aisles are against congressional term limits?
Get your political affiliation out of my logic. If either side had complete control of the laws governing the internet, they would make things even worse. What we need is legitimate compromise. Over (gov.) regulation is just as wrong as under (gov.) regulation.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
04:48 Dumb Telecom Take Of The Week: Because The Internet Didn't Explode, Killing Net Neutrality Must Not Have Mattered (23)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
04:55 Axios Parrots A Lot Of Dumb, Debunked Nonsense About Net Neutrality (54)
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
More arrow