California Agrees To Delay Net Neutrality Law Pending Outcome Of Federal Lawsuit

from the round-and-round-we-go dept

California has agreed to pause the state’s shiny new net neutrality law pending the outcome of a looming federal lawsuit against the FCC. After some early gamesmanship courtesy of AT&T, California passed one of the toughest net neutrality laws in the nation (which isn’t saying much) back in September. The law effectively mirrors the discarded 2015 FCC net neutrality rules, though the law goes a little further to ensure that ISPs can’t abuse things like zero rating (exempting a partner or an ISP’s own content but not others) and usage caps.

In a not entirely-unexpected move, the state late last week struck a deal with government and industry lawyers, agreeing to delay its implementation until a lawsuit against the FCC can be settled. That federal lawsuit, filed by Mozilla and 23 State Attorneys General, isn’t expected to hear opening arguments until February. If the FCC and industry lose, the 2015 rules would be restored. If the FCC and industry win, the legal fight shifts to whether states will be allowed to implement their own rules, potentially, eventually, coming down to new Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Given the looming federal lawsuit, the decision to pause California’s effort is largely just about legal efficiency. But Ajit Pai being Ajit Pai, the FCC boss, in a statement, was quick to declare the agreement as a one-sided victory; namely his:

“I am pleased that California has agreed not to enforce its onerous Internet regulations. This substantial concession reflects the strength of the case made by the United States earlier this month. It also demonstrates, contrary to the claims of the law?s supporters, that there is no urgent problem that these regulations are needed to address. Indeed, California?s agreement not to enforce these regulations will allow Californians to continue to enjoy free-data plans that have proven to be popular among consumers.”

Granted things have been pretty quiet in the wake of the repeal not because the rules aren’t necessary, but because ISPs don’t want to add any ammunition to the looming federal lawsuits against the FCC. Should they win that lawsuit, you can be absolutely certain you won’t miss their efforts to nickel-and-dime consumers. Regardless, the bill’s author, Scott Weiner, didn’t think much of Pai’s victory lap:

In perfect operational symmetry (since we’re not even operating under the pretense that lobbyists aren’t dictating federal policy anymore) both the broadband industry and the Department of Justice sued to block Califormia’s law, claiming that the FCC’s net neutrality repeal pre-empts (bans) states from trying to protect consumers. Most lawyers I’ve spoken to have stated the FCC’s attempts to thwart state consumer protections aren’t legally sound, and the best the industry (and its BFFs at the FCC) can do is delay, not kill, state net neutrality rules.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “California Agrees To Delay Net Neutrality Law Pending Outcome Of Federal Lawsuit”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Selling sips at a public fountain

Pretty sure he’s talking about zero-rating, and if so to call that ‘free-data’ is to be highly misleading/dishonest.

Sure zero-rated content is ‘free’, in that you got it for ‘free’ before when all traffic was treated the same, then the ISP decided to make it cost you extra, and now they are generously allowing you to get it for ‘free’ again.

Screen name: Goes Here says:

"Agrees" -- HA, HA! Just recognizing reality.

The FCC has decided NOT regulating is its regulation. No hope of Calif law standing.

I note that about half the comments now are on typos. And the pieces aren’t even up to fluff. I’m still giving long odds in the office that this is Techdirt’s last year.

ECA (profile) says:

“The California lawsuit is inextricably tied to the outcome of the D.C. case, currently being heard in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. If in that case, a judge finds the FCC overstepped its authority when it revoked the 2015 Open Internet Order, then California’s net neutrality law will, essentially, no longer matter. “

Umm, NO..

IF the FCC is right, then you have no choice..

If they are Wrong, then ???? would be best to HAVE YOUR OWN LAWS…because they can CHANGE Federal law..

Part of he doesnt want to be the FIRST.. its going to be a hard battle, Unless the Judge gets smart…and tells both sides they have 1 day to STATE the problem. Why fight this in a 5 year long battle, to Prove WHO has rights..

Also, The main/only thing EACH state has to Do is the laws of the Constitution.. And EACH STATE can have their OWN LAWS..

And if enough States Jump into this…THEY will have the power.

Something to think about.. These corps control…TV/CABLE/SAT/Phone/Cellphone/internet ISP(only the last mile in cities) And have been subsidized for years..(WE PAID for much of it) as the Gov. REQUIRED that they be the Emergency system of this nation..

They could consolidate ALL of these services into 1.. with 1 Fiber line to every home. And placing a Mini Cell system on each box.. You could cover EVERYTHING.. and make it CHEAPER..

These corps are only bill collectors…they didnt install the original system. NOW they are being asked to UPDATE IT ALL.

If enough States jump in and Do it…The Gov. cant do anything..

MrTea says:

The abuse of federal authority–driven by big money from the biggest corporations–is one of the plagues of our times. This is how the banks can charge you a late fee or overdraft fee that is BIGGER than the actual overdraft or unpaid bill.

The ones you don’t even know about–thanks to our sterling Free Press–are the worst. See “China RX” about the outsourcing of pharmaceuticals, so far ignored by the “news” networks–the author was allowed on C-Span BookTV and also featured on Sharyl Attkisson’s “Full Measure” syndicated program.

You have more right to know where your fish came from than where those expensive pharma products were made. Want to sea an interesting reaction, ask the MD “so where did they MAKE that vaccine?” Pharma is the most powerful lobby in DC, they have 3 lobbyists per member of Congress.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »